trailofbits/skills

diagramming-code

Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark code graphs.

ソースを見る
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Diagramming Code

Generates Mermaid diagrams from Trailmark's code graph. A pre-made script handles Mermaid syntax generation; Claude selects the diagram type and parameters. Trailmark 0.4.0 includes a native trailmark diagram command; use it only after a version/command check, otherwise use this skill's bundled script.

When to Use

  • Visualizing call paths between functions
  • Drawing class inheritance hierarchies
  • Mapping module import dependencies
  • Showing class structure with members
  • Highlighting complexity hotspots with color coding
  • Tracing data flow from entrypoints to sensitive functions

When NOT to Use

  • Querying the graph without visualization (use the trailmark skill)
  • Mutation testing triage (use the genotoxic skill)
  • Architecture diagrams not derived from code (draw by hand)

Prerequisites

trailmark must be installed. If uv run trailmark fails, run:

bash
uv tool install trailmark
# Python snippets: uv run --with trailmark python -   (a tool env is not importable)

DO NOT fall back to hand-writing Mermaid from source code reading. The script uses Trailmark's parsed graph for accuracy. If installation fails, report the error to the user.

Version Gate

Check whether native v0.4 diagram support exists:

bash
trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null || uv run trailmark diagram --help 2>/dev/null

If this succeeds, you may use trailmark diagram. If it fails, use uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py, which keeps the older skill workflow intact. Do not assume the native CLI exists on Trailmark 0.2.x.


Quick Start

bash
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py \
    --target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
    --focus main --depth 2

# Trailmark 0.4.0+ equivalent after the Version Gate succeeds
uv run trailmark diagram \
    --target {targetDir} --language auto --type call-graph \
    --focus main --depth 2

Output is raw Mermaid text. Wrap in a fenced code block:

`markdown

flowchart TB ...


Diagram Types

├─ "Who calls what?"               → --type call-graph
├─ "Class inheritance?"             → --type class-hierarchy
├─ "Module dependencies?"           → --type module-deps
├─ "Class members and structure?"   → --type containment
├─ "Where is complexity highest?"   → --type complexity
└─ "Path from input to function?"   → --type data-flow

For detailed examples of each type, see references/diagram-types.md.


Workflow

Diagram Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify trailmark is installed
- [ ] Step 2: Identify diagram type from user request
- [ ] Step 3: Determine focus node and parameters
- [ ] Step 4: Run diagram.py script (or native trailmark diagram on v0.4+)
- [ ] Step 5: Verify output is non-empty and well-formed
- [ ] Step 6: Embed diagram in response

Step 1: Run uv run trailmark analyze --language auto --summary {targetDir}. Install if it fails. Then run pre-analysis via the programmatic API:

python
from trailmark.query.api import QueryEngine

engine = QueryEngine.from_directory("{targetDir}", language="auto")
engine.preanalysis()

Pre-analysis enriches the graph with blast radius, taint propagation, and privilege boundary data used by data-flow diagrams.

If auto-detection is wrong for the target, rerun with an explicit language or comma-separated list such as python,rust.

Step 2: Match the user's request to a --type using the decision tree above.

Step 3: For call-graph and data-flow, identify the focus function. Default --depth 2. Use --direction LR for dependency flows.

Step 4: Run the script and capture stdout. If the native v0.4 CLI is available, either command is acceptable; prefer the bundled script when you need behavior consistent with this skill's references.

Step 5: Check: output starts with flowchart or classDiagram, contains at least one node. If empty or malformed, consult references/mermaid-syntax.md.

Step 6: Wrap output in mermaid code fence.


Script Reference

uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py [OPTIONS]
# or, on Trailmark 0.4.0+:
uv run trailmark diagram [OPTIONS]
ArgumentShortDefaultDescription
--target-trequiredDirectory to analyze
--language-lpythonSource language
--type-TrequiredDiagram type (see above)
--focus-fnoneCenter diagram on this node
--depth-d2BFS traversal depth
--directionTBLayout: TB (top-bottom) or LR (left-right)
--threshold10Min complexity for complexity type

Examples

bash
# Call graph centered on a function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T call-graph -f parse_file

# Class hierarchy for a Rust project
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -l rust -T class-hierarchy

# Module dependency map, left-to-right
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T module-deps --direction LR

# Class members
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T containment

# Complexity heatmap (threshold 5)
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T complexity --threshold 5

# Data flow from entrypoints to a specific function
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/diagram.py -t src/ -T data-flow -f execute_query

Customization

Direction: Use TB (default) for hierarchical views, LR for left-to-right flows like dependency chains.

Depth: Increase --depth to see more of the call graph. Decrease to reduce clutter. The script warns if the diagram exceeds 100 nodes.

Focus: Always use --focus for call-graph on non-trivial codebases. For data-flow, omitting focus auto-targets the top 10 complexity hotspots.

Language: Prefer --language auto for polyglot or unfamiliar repos. Use an explicit language only when you know the target is single-language or you need to exclude unrelated components.


Supporting Documentation

  • [references/diagram-types.md](references/diagram-types.md) -

Detailed docs and Mermaid examples for each diagram type

  • [references/mermaid-syntax.md](references/mermaid-syntax.md) -

ID sanitization, escaping, style definitions, and common pitfalls

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
trailofbits
コミュニティ

agentic-actions-auditor

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

audit-context-building

Understand a codebase before looking for bugs in it - what each function assumes, what it guarantees, and what it depends on elsewhere. Use when starting an audit, threat model, or architecture review on unfamiliar code, and before any vulnerability-hunting pass.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

codeql

- Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

differential-review

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日