trailofbits/skills

dwarf-expert

Analyzes DWARF debug information in compiled binaries.

ソースを見る
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

DWARF Expert

Expertise for DWARF debug info: parsing and searching it, verifying its integrity, answering questions about the standard, and writing code that consumes it. Out of scope: runtime debugging (use gdb/lldb), reverse engineering beyond the DWARF sections (use Ghidra/IDA), and compiler-specific DWARF generation bugs.

Authoritative Sources

When precision matters, look standard details up instead of answering from memory:

  1. dwarfstd.org — the official specification. Web-search specific sections,

e.g. "DWARF5 DWTAGsubprogram attributes site:dwarfstd.org".

  1. LLVMllvm/lib/DebugInfo/DWARF/ is a reliable reference implementation:

DWARFDie.cpp (DIE and attribute access), DWARFUnit.cpp (compilation units), DWARFDebugLine.cpp (line tables), DWARFVerifier.cpp (validation).

  1. libdwarf — the reference C implementation at github.com/davea42/libdwarf-code.

Parsing and Searching with dwarfdump

Prefer dwarfdump over readelf for DWARF-specific work. Two implementations exist — libdwarf's dwarfdump and LLVM's llvm-dwarfdump — with different options, and a bare dwarfdump command may be either: check dwarfdump --version first. The options below are LLVM's.

On macOS, linked Mach-O executables do not carry DWARF: it stays in the .o files until dsymutil collects it into a .dSYM bundle. Point dwarfdump at the dSYM (or the object files), not the executable. pyelftools is ELF-only — for Mach-O scripted work, stay with the LLVM tools.

  • --all: dump every DWARF section; --debug-info, --debug-line, etc. dump one
  • --show-children [--recurse-depth=<n>]: include child DIEs when printing

selected entries — parameters, locals, and struct members are children of function and type DIEs

  • --show-parents [--parent-recurse-depth=<n>]: include parent DIEs
  • --show-form: print attribute form types, for when encoding details matter
  • --find=<name>: exact-name lookup via the accelerator tables — fast but not

exhaustive; fall back to --name when it misses

  • --name=<pattern> [--ignore-case] [--regex]: exhaustive DIE-name search
  • --lookup=<address>: find the DIE covering an address
  • --verbose: print low-level encoding detail

Searching DIEs

Escalate through these strategies as the query grows more complex:

  1. Name or address match: --find, then --name; --lookup for addresses.
  2. Attribute or type queries (e.g. all parameters of type float *): dump and

filter. grep -B pulls in the header line carrying each DIE's offset: llvm-dwarfdump file | grep -B 5 "float \*" | grep DW_TAG_formal_parameter, then print each DIE at its offset with --debug-info=<offset> --show-children (--lookup takes a program address, not a DIE offset).

  1. Multi-attribute or structural queries: when grep pipelines turn brittle,

write a Python script using pyelftools instead.

Verifying DWARF Integrity

  • llvm-dwarfdump --verify <binary>: structural checks (unit chains, DIE

relationships, address ranges). --error-display=<quiet|summary|details|full> controls detail; --verify-json=<path> writes a machine-readable error summary; --quiet for exit-code-only checks.

  • llvm-dwarfdump --statistics <binary>: debug-info quality metrics as JSON —

compare across compiler versions or optimization levels to catch regressions.

Verify after producing DWARF (compilers, binary rewriters), when a debugger misbehaves on a binary, and when developing DWARF tooling against known-good files.

When a current-generation compiler emitted an old DWARF version, the build explicitly passed -gdwarf-N — modern gcc and clang default to v4/v5, so check the build system rather than assuming a toolchain default. GCC embeds its flags in DW_AT_producer, so the pin is often readable right there; clang's producer string carries no flags. Old versions remain common in the wild and read the same way apart from surface forms: in v2 output, member offsets appear as location expressions (DW_OP_plus_uconst) and linkage names as DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name.

readelf

For general ELF structure, or when dwarfdump is unavailable:

  • --debug-dump=<section>: dump a DWARF section (info, line, ...)
  • --dwarf-depth=<n> / --dwarf-start=<n>: limit DIE depth / start offset

Writing Code That Parses DWARF

Prefer an existing library over parsing by hand:

LibraryLanguageNotes
libdwarfC/C++github.com/davea42/libdwarf-code — low-level; used to implement dwarfdump
pyelftoolsPythongithub.com/eliben/pyelftools — also parses ELF in general
gimliRustgithub.com/gimli-rs/gimli — pair with object to load container files
debug/dwarfGostandard library
LibObjectFile.NETgithub.com/xoofx/LibObjectFile — also handles ELF/PE object files

Default to Python with pyelftools for one-off scripts unless the task dictates otherwise.

DWARF-specific pitfalls to handle — and to check for when reviewing DWARF code:

  • Attributes are optional: a DIE may omit DW_AT_name, DW_AT_type, ranges, etc.
  • Attribute indirection: a DIE's attributes may live on the DIE referenced by its

DW_AT_abstract_origin (inlined instances) or DW_AT_specification (out-of-line definitions) — resolve the chain before concluding data is absent.

  • Type chains: qualifiers and modifiers (DW_TAG_const_type,

DW_TAG_pointer_type, ...) wrap the underlying type; walk DW_AT_type links to reach the base type.

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
trailofbits
コミュニティ

agentic-actions-auditor

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

audit-context-building

Understand a codebase before looking for bugs in it - what each function assumes, what it guarantees, and what it depends on elsewhere. Use when starting an audit, threat model, or architecture review on unfamiliar code, and before any vulnerability-hunting pass.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

codeql

- Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日
trailofbits
コミュニティ

differential-review

Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.

導入数
3
GitHub Stars
7012
更新日
9月2日