Verwendung
- Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
- Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
- Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skills --skill m07-concurrencyVor dem Start
- Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
- Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument
Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.
Concurrency
Layer 1: Language Mechanics
Core Question
Is this CPU-bound or I/O-bound, and what's the sharing model?
Before choosing concurrency primitives:
- What's the workload type?
- What data needs to be shared?
- What's the thread safety requirement?
Error → Design Question
| Error | Don't Just Say | Ask Instead |
|---|---|---|
| E0277 Send | "Add Send bound" | Should this type cross threads? |
| E0277 Sync | "Wrap in Mutex" | Is shared access really needed? |
| Future not Send | "Use spawn_local" | Is async the right choice? |
| Deadlock | "Reorder locks" | Is the locking design correct? |
Thinking Prompt
Before adding concurrency:
- What's the workload?
- CPU-bound → threads (std::thread, rayon)
- I/O-bound → async (tokio, async-std)
- Mixed → hybrid approach
- What's the sharing model?
- No sharing → message passing (channels)
- Immutable sharing → Arc<T>
- Mutable sharing → Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
- What are the Send/Sync requirements?
- Cross-thread ownership → Send
- Cross-thread references → Sync
- Single-thread async → spawn_local
Trace Up ↑ (MANDATORY)
CRITICAL: Don't just fix the error. Trace UP to find domain constraints.
Domain Detection Table
| Context Keywords | Load Domain Skill | Key Constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Web API, HTTP, axum, actix, handler | domain-web | Handlers run on any thread |
| 交易, 支付, trading, payment | domain-fintech | Audit + thread safety |
| gRPC, kubernetes, microservice | domain-cloud-native | Distributed tracing |
| CLI, terminal, clap | domain-cli | Usually single-thread OK |
Example: Web API + Rc Error
"Rc cannot be sent between threads" in Web API context
↑ DETECT: "Web API" → Load domain-web
↑ FIND: domain-web says "Shared state must be thread-safe"
↑ FIND: domain-web says "Rc in state" is Common Mistake
↓ DESIGN: Use Arc<T> with State extractor
↓ IMPL: axum::extract::State<Arc<AppConfig>>Generic Trace
"Send not satisfied for my type"
↑ Ask: What domain is this? Load domain-* skill
↑ Ask: Does this type need to cross thread boundaries?
↑ Check: m09-domain (is the data model correct?)| Situation | Trace To | Question |
|---|---|---|
| Send/Sync in Web | domain-web | What's the state management pattern? |
| Send/Sync in CLI | domain-cli | Is multi-thread really needed? |
| Mutex vs channels | m09-domain | Shared state or message passing? |
| Async vs threads | m10-performance | What's the workload profile? |
Trace Down ↓
From design to implementation:
"Need parallelism for CPU work"
↓ Use: std::thread or rayon
"Need concurrency for I/O"
↓ Use: async/await with tokio
"Need to share immutable data across threads"
↓ Use: Arc<T>
"Need to share mutable data across threads"
↓ Use: Arc<Mutex<T>> or Arc<RwLock<T>>
↓ Or: channels for message passing
"Need simple atomic operations"
↓ Use: AtomicBool, AtomicUsize, etc.Send/Sync Markers
| Marker | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
Send | Can transfer ownership between threads | Most types |
Sync | Can share references between threads | Arc<T> |
!Send | Must stay on one thread | Rc<T> |
!Sync | No shared refs across threads | RefCell<T> |
Quick Reference
| Pattern | Thread-Safe | Blocking | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
std::thread | Yes | Yes | CPU-bound parallelism |
async/await | Yes | No | I/O-bound concurrency |
Mutex<T> | Yes | Yes | Shared mutable state |
RwLock<T> | Yes | Yes | Read-heavy shared state |
mpsc::channel | Yes | Optional | Message passing |
Arc<Mutex<T>> | Yes | Yes | Shared mutable across threads |
Decision Flowchart
What type of work?
├─ CPU-bound → std::thread or rayon
├─ I/O-bound → async/await
└─ Mixed → hybrid (spawn_blocking)
Need to share data?
├─ No → message passing (channels)
├─ Immutable → Arc<T>
└─ Mutable →
├─ Read-heavy → Arc<RwLock<T>>
└─ Write-heavy → Arc<Mutex<T>>
└─ Simple counter → AtomicUsize
Async context?
├─ Type is Send → tokio::spawn
├─ Type is !Send → spawn_local
└─ Blocking code → spawn_blockingCommon Errors
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
E0277 Send not satisfied | Non-Send in async | Use Arc or spawn_local |
E0277 Sync not satisfied | Non-Sync shared | Wrap with Mutex |
| Deadlock | Lock ordering | Consistent lock order |
future is not Send | Non-Send across await | Drop before await |
MutexGuard across await | Guard held during suspend | Scope guard properly |
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Better |
|---|---|---|
| Arc<Mutex<T>> everywhere | Contention, complexity | Message passing |
| thread::sleep in async | Blocks executor | tokio::time::sleep |
| Holding locks across await | Blocks other tasks | Scope locks tightly |
| Ignoring deadlock risk | Hard to debug | Lock ordering, try_lock |
Async-Specific Patterns
Avoid MutexGuard Across Await
rust
// Bad: guard held across await
let guard = mutex.lock().await;
do_async().await; // guard still held!
// Good: scope the lock
{
let guard = mutex.lock().await;
// use guard
} // guard dropped
do_async().await;Non-Send Types in Async
rust
// Rc is !Send, can't cross await in spawned task
// Option 1: use Arc instead
// Option 2: use spawn_local (single-thread runtime)
// Option 3: ensure Rc is dropped before .awaitRelated Skills
| When | See |
|---|---|
| Smart pointer choice | m02-resource |
| Interior mutability | m03-mutability |
| Performance tuning | m10-performance |
| Domain concurrency needs | domain-* |
