michael-denyer/pstack-claude

thermos

Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings.

Quelltext ansehen

Verwendung

  1. Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
  2. Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
  3. Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/michael-denyer/pstack-claude --skill thermos

Vor dem Start

  • Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
  • Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

Thermos

On Codex, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.

On GitHub Copilot, read the platform mapping, including its per-skill notes, before following this skill.

Run the two thermo review passes as async background subagents in parallel, then synthesize their results.

Workflow

  1. Determine the review scope from the user request, PR, current branch, or relevant changed files.
  2. Gather the diff and any file/context excerpts needed for reviewers to evaluate the change without guessing.
  3. Launch both subagents in the same message with run_in_background: true:
  • subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-review-subagent" for bugs, breakages, security, devex regressions, feature-flag leaks, and other branch-audit risks.
  • subagent_type: "pstack:thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent" for maintainability, structure, file-size growth, spaghetti, abstractions, and codebase-health risks.
  1. Pass each subagent the same scoped diff/file context and ask it to return prioritized findings with file references and evidence.
  2. After both finish, synthesize the results with findings first, deduplicated across reviewers. Weight overlapping findings more heavily, resolve disagreements with your own judgment, and keep summaries brief.

If individual background summaries are already visible to the user, do not restate them wholesale. Surface the unified verdict, the highest-signal findings, and any remaining uncertainty.

Verwandte Aufgaben

aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills