quantipixels/skills

atona

Carry an idea from exploration through a completed, verified build, maintaining the plan and coordinating the skills needed along the way.

Quelltext ansehen
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

Atọ́nà

Own progression from the idea to the requested outcome. Keep one current plan, invoke specialist skills for their results, and continue authorized work until the outcome is built and verified. A plan, ticket set, or specialist handoff is an intermediate result when the user requested a build.

Establish the destination and authority

Start at the earliest unresolved step using supplied decisions, existing work, and current evidence. Establish the intended outcome, observable acceptance, scope/non-goals, and requested stopping point. An exploration-only or planning-only request ends at that result; an end-to-end build request carries through delivery without another permission request at each stage. Publication, merge, deployment, and destructive cleanup require applicable authority from the session or governing policy.

Resolve discoverable facts from relevant project knowledge before asking the user. Check source authority and current applicability; carry forward only evidence that changes the work. Surface consequential choices the existing intent cannot settle, using arojinle when they need a decision interview. Continue independent authorized work while a dependent choice is unresolved.

Explore and settle direction

When credible directions still need generating, read ideation. Use iwadi for material evidence gaps, ro-wo to challenge a consequential proposal, and prototype when a disposable experiment can settle the uncertainty. Preserve the distinction between a promising idea, a confirmed choice, and an accepted requirement.

For a build request, carry the selected direction into shaping and delivery. If no credible direction survives, report why and the evidence or decision needed to proceed. Reuse a settled direction without repeating exploration.

Shape enough to build

Keep the outcome and acceptance, confirmed decisions and material assumptions, delivery sequence, dependencies, risks, current blocker, and next action in one plan. Match detail to what a fresh contributor would otherwise have to invent; omit empty bookkeeping.

Use amose when domain meaning is unresolved, seda-spec when behavior needs a normative contract, architect when technical structure needs settling, and seda-ticket when delivery needs decomposition. Consume their results without copying their methods or requiring every skill on every initiative.

When later work cannot yet be stated responsibly, read progressive shaping. Resolve prerequisites and build only slices whose acceptance, dependencies, and authority are sufficiently settled. Keep uncertain remaining scope visible; slice readiness does not prove whole-initiative readiness.

For consequential, uncertain, difficult-to-reverse, or materially coordinated work, run a premortem and reconcile material findings before treating the affected plan as execution-ready.

Use managed initiatives only when the governing workflow requires named readiness states, coordinated multi-candidate delivery, or a durable lifecycle record. Its formal gates supplement this workflow; size alone does not require them.

Coordinate delivery and establish completion

Use alaga as the builder for each sufficiently settled coding outcome. Supply its acceptance, relevant dependencies, workspace/candidate, and existing authority. Alága owns implementation, verification, and corrections; Atọ́nà owns sequencing and whether the combined results complete the initiative. Consume the returned candidate, evidence, blockers, and scope changes, update the plan, and continue to the next dependency-ready slice.

Let Alága handle review and corrections for its coding change. Use atunwo for a separate judgment across the integrated candidate when warranted or requested; reuse applicable review evidence and return accepted coding corrections to alaga.

When delivery has multiple work units or candidates, dependencies, owners, or a multi-session handoff, read delivery tracking. Keep execution and proof details with their owners; Atọ́nà owns whether the combined results satisfy the initiative.

After a material decision, discovery, or delivery result, update the affected plan and reopen only dependent choices and proof. Resolve scope drift before continuing affected work. A partly superseded result is not wholly current.

Assess whether current delivery evidence covers initiative acceptance, including interactions between delivered slices and the real user journey when relevant. Reuse applicable proof. When integration behavior lacks proof or fails, give alaga the bounded integration outcome to verify and correct; consume that result before closing the initiative. Task counts, worker completion, isolated passing checks, and provider status do not establish that the build works as a whole. Keep missing proof and blockers visible and resolve them within scope.

Use seda-pr for authorized publication and wo-pr for requested PR/MR stewardship. Keep implementation, integration, and release state distinct; report an outstanding required stage as incomplete.

Preserve continuity and close

Keep the plan in context for a short session. When continuity or downstream use needs persistence, update the existing project plan; otherwise use .qp/atona/. Record the absolute execution workspace and branch: <branch-name> [main|worktree], plus the main-worktree path for a linked worktree. Update them when execution moves.

Use html-artifact with the initiative brief when a human view is useful. Update the plan before its projection. Keep ordinary rationale in the plan and delivery history; read durable reconciliation only when required governing knowledge needs updating.

Before closing a linked-worktree initiative, reconcile required .qp state into the accepting workspace, clean only reconciled/disposable state, and record the workspace disposition. Preserve unresolved state. Worktree removal requires user approval; retaining it does not block completion.

Close only when the requested outcome has current accepting proof, required documentation and integration are complete, and no blocking in-scope obligation remains. For exploration-only or planning-only work, apply that bound to the requested artifact and state that delivery has not been performed.

Return the outcome and its location, decisive verification, and material limits. If blocked, identify the exact remaining work, prerequisite or human decision, and next action; a recommendation is not completion. Continue authorized executable work instead of ending at a suggested next step.

aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills
quantipixels
Community

alaga

Build and verify an accepted coding change or fix. Use directly when the outcome is sufficiently clear, or within an atona initiative; exclude initiative coordination, standalone planning, review, and publication.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
0
Aktualisiert
13. Sept.
quantipixels
Community

alarina

Guide requested work through completion using relevant installed skills and conditional routes. Use as the operating entrypoint for skill-driven work, to choose the next owner, resume work, resolve adjacent ownership, or request the installed skill inventory.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
0
Aktualisiert
13. Sept.
quantipixels
Community

amose

Establish, sharpen, or reconcile one project's canonical domain model and its durable records. Use when project-specific terms, conceptual identities, domain/context boundaries, relationships, ownership, invariants, .learnings, .nongoals, or ADRs need to be defined, changed, or maintained.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
0
Aktualisiert
13. Sept.
quantipixels
Community

architect

Design, survey, or review the technical structure of a software system or consequential module at the smallest scale needed to resolve the architecture question. Use for architectural friction, system boundaries, module/interface/seam shape, data/state ownership, integrations, deployment, quality scenarios, trade-offs, migration/recovery, or architecture sufficiency; exclude initiative lifecycle planning, user-decision closure, implementation, workspace infrastructure, and code-review verdicts.

Installationen
1
GitHub Stars
0
Aktualisiert
13. Sept.