Contenido del repositorio de origen con títulos, ejemplos, código, tablas, enlaces e imágenes preservados.
Chisle Audit
Scan the target (a diff, a file, or the repo tree) and report what to cut, on both axes. One-shot. Read-only: never edit, never write a flag, never apply fixes.
Scope
- No argument → audit the current
git diff(staged + unstaged). Empty diff → auditHEAD~1..HEAD. - A path → audit that file or directory.
- "repo" / "whole repo" → walk the tree (skip vendored/generated/
node_modules/dist/lockfiles).
What to flag
Code (the YAGNI axis):
- Reinvented stdlib (hand-rolled debounce, deep-clone, groupBy, retry loop, date math)
- Abstraction with one implementation (interface/factory/wrapper for a single case)
- New dependency for what a few lines or an installed dep already covers
- Config/option/flag that never varies
- Speculative "for later" scaffolding with no current caller
- Verbose code where a native platform feature (CSS, DB constraint,
<input type>) does it
Prose (the compression axis), the half a code-only auditor misses:
- Comments that restate the code (
i += 1 // increment i) - Docstrings/READMEs padded with filler, hedging, ceremony, or duplicated content
- Multi-paragraph explanations where one tight sentence carries the meaning
- Decorative tables/emoji/headings that add tokens, not information
- Dead prose: TODO graveyards, stale "see also" links, obsolete sections
What NOT to flag
Input validation at trust boundaries, error handling that prevents data loss, security, accessibility, deliberate // chisle: / // ponytail: shortcuts already documented, or domain comments that explain why (not what).
Output
One ranked list, biggest cut first. One finding per line. No preamble, no praise.
path:line [code|prose] <what's bloated> → <the lean replacement>. (~N lines/tokens)End with a two-line summary:
N findings: X code, Y prose. Est. removable: ~A lines code, ~B lines prose.
Biggest win: <the single highest-impact cut>.Be honest about uncertainty: mark a finding (check) if cutting it might lose behavior you can't verify from the snippet. Lean toward fewer, high-confidence findings over a long speculative list.
