RADAR DE SKILLS · GITHUB
Agent Skills útiles, ordenados por uso real.
Compara Skills verificados por función, contenido del paquete, instalaciones y fiabilidad de la fuente antes de añadirlos.
- ALCANCE DEL CATÁLOGO
- VERIFICADO
- Skills
- 10.772
- repositorios
- 1711
- última sincronización
- 23 sept 2026
ljagielloctf-forensics
Provides digital forensics and signal analysis techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing disk images, memory dumps, event logs, network captures, cryptocurrency transactions, steganography, PDF analysis, Windows registry, Volatility, PCAP, Docker images, coredumps, side-channel power traces, DTMF audio spectrograms, packet timing analysis, CD audio disc images, or recovering deleted files and credentials.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-malware
Provides malware analysis and network traffic techniques for CTF challenges. Use when analyzing obfuscated scripts, malicious packages, custom crypto protocols, C2 traffic, PE/.NET binaries, RC4/AES encrypted communications, YARA rules, shellcode analysis, memory forensics for malware (Volatility malfind, process injection detection), anti-analysis techniques (VM/sandbox detection, timing evasion, API hashing, process injection, environment checks), or extracting malware configurations and indicators of compromise.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-misc
Provides miscellaneous CTF challenge techniques for problems that do not cleanly fit the main categories. Use for encoding puzzles, pyjails, bash jails, RF/SDR, DNS oddities, unicode tricks, esoteric languages, QR or audio puzzles, constraint solving, game theory, unusual sandbox escapes, and hybrid logic puzzles. Prefer a more specific skill first when the challenge is mainly web, pwn, reverse, forensics, malware, OSINT, or crypto. Treat this as the fallback skill for genuine cross-category or edge-case challenges, not the default starting point.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-pwn
Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs, ROP, ret2libc, shellcode, kernel exploitation, seccomp bypass, sandbox escape, or Windows/Linux exploit chains. Do not use it when the main blocker is understanding what the binary does; use reverse engineering first. Do not use it for pure web bugs, disk or packet forensics, or standalone crypto/math challenges.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-reverse
Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malware-like loaders, and anti-debug or anti-analysis logic. Do not use it when the vulnerability is already understood and the remaining task is exploitation; use pwn instead. Do not use it for pure web workflows, log or disk forensics, or standalone crypto problems unless reversing the implementation is the real blocker.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-web
Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, request smuggling, OAuth/OIDC, SAML, prototype pollution, and similar web bugs. Do not use it for native binary memory corruption, reverse engineering of standalone executables, disk or memory forensics, or pure cryptanalysis unless the web flaw is still the main path to the flag.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagielloctf-writeup
Generates a single standardized submission-style CTF writeup for competition handoff and organizer review. Use after solving a CTF challenge to document the solution steps, tools used, and lessons learned in a structured format.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
ljagiellosolve-challenge
Solves CTF challenges by performing first-pass triage, identifying the dominant category, and routing execution to the right specialized ctf- skill. Use when the user gives you a challenge bundle, a remote service, a suspicious file, or only a vague challenge description and you must determine where to start. Do not use it when the category is already clear and a specialized skill can be invoked directly; this is the dispatcher and recon entrypoint, not the deepest reference for category-specific techniques.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,3 mil
- Actualizado
- 13 sept
google-deepminduv
- Checks whether the uv Python package manager is installed and installs it if missing. Ensures uv is on PATH. Use when another skill requires uv as a prerequisite.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 3,1 mil
- Actualizado
- 15 sept
getsentrysecurity-review
Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 1 mil
- Actualizado
- 21 sept
trailofbitsdifferential-review
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes. Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git blame for context, calculates blast radius by counting callers, checks test coverage of modified code, and generates a markdown report. Use when reviewing a PR, commit, or diff for security vulnerabilities, checking whether a change re-introduces a previously fixed bug, asking what else a change could break, or finding which modified code has no test covering it.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitsgh-cli
Enforces authenticated gh CLI workflows over unauthenticated curl, WebFetch, and MCP fetch patterns. Use when working with GitHub URLs, API access, pull requests, or issues.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitsmodern-cpp
Guides C++ code toward modern idioms (C++20/23/26). Use when writing new C++ code, modernizing legacy patterns, or working on security-critical C++. Replaces raw pointers with smart pointers, SFINAE with concepts, printf with std::print, error codes with std::expected.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitsmodern-python
Configures Python projects with modern tooling (uv, ruff, ty). Use when creating projects, writing standalone scripts, or migrating from pip/Poetry/mypy/black.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitspost-patch-validation
Validates security patches with reproducible baseline-versus-patched evidence, including original exploits, root-cause variants, behavior preservation, regressions, and newly introduced security failures. Use after a patch exists and before accepting, merging, or reporting it as fixed; also use when an AI-generated patch, remediation commit, pull request, or proposed upstream fix needs adversarial post-patch validation across any language.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitssecure-workflow-guide
Guides through Trail of Bits' 5-step secure development workflow. Runs Slither scans, checks special features (upgradeability/ERC conformance/token integration), generates visual security diagrams, helps document security properties for fuzzing/verification, and reviews manual security areas. Use when securing a smart contract end to end rather than hunting one bug, checking a project on every check-in or before deployment, triaging a Slither report, or asking where to start on smart contract security.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
trailofbitssharp-edges
Identifies error-prone APIs, dangerous configurations, and footgun designs that enable security mistakes. Use when reviewing API designs, configuration schemas, cryptographic library ergonomics, or evaluating whether code follows 'secure by default' and 'pit of success' principles. Triggers: footgun, misuse-resistant, secure defaults, API usability, dangerous configuration.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 7,2 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
owl-listenerdesign-token-audit
Audit token usage across a product for coverage, drift, and hard-coded values. Use when tokens exist and you suspect they are being bypassed. For defining tokens in the first place, use design-token (design-systems).
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 2,7 mil
- Actualizado
- 5 sept
stellarlinkcoproduct-requirements
Interactive Product Owner skill for requirements gathering, analysis, and PRD generation. Triggers when users request product requirements, feature specification, PRD creation, or need help understanding and documenting project requirements. Uses quality scoring and iterative dialogue to ensure comprehensive requirements before generating professional PRD documents.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 2,7 mil
- Actualizado
- 4 may
dotnetbinlog-failure-analysis
Analyze MSBuild binary logs to diagnose build failures. USE FOR: build errors that are unclear from console output, diagnosing cascading failures across multi-project builds, tracing MSBuild target execution order, and generally any MSBuild build issues. Requires an existing .binlog file. DO NOT USE FOR: generating binlogs (use binlog-generation), non-MSBuild build systems.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 5,5 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
dotnetcoverage-analysis
Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing-agent.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 5,5 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
dotnetdirectory-build-organization
Guide for organizing MSBuild infrastructure with Directory.Build.props, Directory.Build.targets, Directory.Packages.props, and Directory.Build.rsp. USE FOR: structuring multi-project repos, centralizing build settings, implementing NuGet Central Package Management (CPM) with ManagePackageVersionsCentrally, consolidating duplicated properties across .csproj files, setting up multi-level Directory.Build hierarchy with GetPathOfFileAbove, understanding evaluation order (Directory.Build.props → SDK .props → .csproj → SDK .targets → Directory.Build.targets). Critical pitfall: $(TargetFramework) conditions in .props silently fail for single-targeting projects — must use .targets. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, migrating legacy projects to SDK-style (use msbuild-modernization), single-project solutions with no shared settings.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 5,5 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
dotnetdotnet-aot-compat
Make .NET projects compatible with Native AOT and trimming by systematically resolving IL trim/AOT analyzer warnings. USE FOR: making projects AOT-compatible, fixing trimming warnings, resolving IL warnings (IL2026, IL2070, IL2067, IL2072, IL3050), adding DynamicallyAccessedMembers annotations, enabling IsAotCompatible. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing native AOT binaries, optimizing binary size, replacing reflection-heavy libraries with alternatives. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 5,5 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept
dotnetmsbuild-modernization
Guide for modernizing and migrating MSBuild project files to SDK-style format. USE FOR: converting legacy .csproj/.vbproj with verbose XML to SDK-style, migrating packages.config to PackageReference, removing Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs in favor of auto-generation, eliminating explicit lists via implicit globbing, consolidating shared settings into Directory.Build.props. Indicators of legacy projects: ToolsVersion attribute, , .csproj files 50 lines for simple projects. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already in SDK-style format, non-.NET build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), .NET Framework projects that cannot move to SDK-style.
- instalaciones
- 1
- GitHub Stars
- 5,5 mil
- Actualizado
- 22 sept