Contenido del repositorio de origen con títulos, ejemplos, código, tablas, enlaces e imágenes preservados.
Runpod (router)
The entrypoint for the Runpod skills. This skill does no work itself — it picks the right lane and hands off. For a multi-step or provisioning task, check the worked examples first and let the matching one pick the lane; otherwise read the matching skill's SKILL.md next.
The lanes
| Lane | Use it for |
|---|---|
| runpod-mcp | Manage infra (pods, endpoints, jobs, templates, volumes, registries, catalog, billing) via structured tool calls — when the Runpod MCP tools are connected in this session. |
| runpodctl | Manage the same infra from a terminal/CI/script, plus the things only the CLI does: Hub browse/deploy, send/receive file transfer, SSH keys, doctor setup, model cache. |
| flash | Write Python that runs on Runpod serverless — @remote/@Endpoint functions, flash dev hot-reload, flash deploy. Code-first, not infra management. |
| companion-clis | Prerequisite artifacts: download a model (hf), build/push an image (docker), repos/releases (gh), move data to a network volume over S3 (aws). |
| runpod-usage | Understand how Runpod works before acting — pods vs serverless, building a container, storage, GPU selection, gotchas. Knowledge only. |
| runpod-templates | Official prebuilt pod templates (ComfyUI, PyTorch, …): is there one for this workload, and what does its image ship — ports, paths, autostart, readiness, what's missing on first boot. Reference + routing hub; deploy via runpod-mcp/runpodctl. |
| runpod-migrate | Move existing code off the GraphQL API or REST v1 onto REST v2 — inventory which parts use which version, rewrite call sites, flag breaking changes. Edits the user's code; does not manage infra. |
These skills are a snapshot; the tools are the source of truth
Every lane below wraps something that ships on its own release train and moves faster than this repo. So route with these skills, but take capability and syntax from the tool in front of you:
| Lane | Ask it directly |
|---|---|
| runpodctl | runpodctl --help, runpodctl <resource> <action> --help, runpodctl version. For failure shapes, run a command wrong on purpose and read the JSON |
| runpod-mcp | your client's tool list (/mcp in Claude Code) — each tool carries its own parameter descriptions |
| flash | flash --help, and the deploy/dev output |
| companion-clis | that CLI's own --help (hf, gh, docker, aws) |
| runpod-templates | runpodctl template list --type official, template get <id> (its readme is authoritative) |
| REST v2 | the live spec at https://api.runpod.io/v2/openapi.json |
Never tell a user a tool cannot do something without checking first. A missing capability is the claim most likely to be out of date here, and it is the one a reader has no reason to reverify — it has already gone stale twice (runpodctl v2.9.0 added serverless health, v2.10.0 added pod logs/serverless logs). If a limit still holds, name the version it holds for rather than saying "cannot".
First run — check auth before the first infra action
Infra tasks (pods, endpoints, jobs, volumes) need a working control plane — the Runpod MCP or runpodctl. Don't start and discover mid-task that nothing's set up: check first, and if it isn't, help the user set up rather than limping on a partial fallback.
Check (credential resolution order: RUNPOD_API_KEY env → .env → ~/.runpod/config.toml):
runpodctl user # succeeds ⇒ a key is set and validPlus, in Claude Code, /mcp should show runpod Connected.
Rule: get a key first — do not default to MCP OAuth. The reason: one RUNPOD_API_KEY unlocks every tool — it authenticates runpodctl + flash + the hosted MCP (as --header "Authorization: Bearer $RUNPOD_API_KEY"). The MCP's "Sign in with Runpod" OAuth auths the MCP alone — the CLIs stay blocked, so you hit a wall on any CLI-only task (Hub, send/receive, SSH, doctor, model cache/Model Repository, CPU endpoints). ⚠️ OAuth-only is a half-setup. If nothing's set up, stop and get a key, in order:
- `flash login` — browser OAuth that saves a real key to
~/.runpod/config.toml(runpodctl
- flash read it; reuse it for the MCP Bearer). One step, unlocks all. Human-only.
- `export RUNPOD_API_KEY=…` (https://console.runpod.io/user/settings) — same full unlock;
best for headless agents.
- MCP OAuth only (
/mcp→ Sign in) — last resort, MCP-only work; CLIs stay unauthed.
Then: if a lane already works, use it — but if only the MCP is OAuth'd, still get a key before any CLI-only step. Missing a CLI? curl -sSL https://cli.runpod.net | bash (runpodctl) · uv tool install runpod-flash (flash) · npx @runpod/mcp-server@latest add (MCP). Full setup: `runpod-usage/reference/getting-started.md`.
How to route
0. Does a worked example already cover this? For anything beyond a single call, check the golden-paths index before picking a lane — a matching path already names the lane(s), the flags, the ordering, and the traps, so routing becomes reading rather than re-deriving. Check it when any of these is true:
- the task needs more than one resource (image + template + endpoint, pod + volume,
multi-region, …) or more than one lane
- it provisions something billable, or the user's ask is shaped like *"get X running /
deployed / working"*
- it involves storage, networking, autoscaling, streaming, or debugging a live resource —
the areas where the non-obvious ordering is the whole difficulty
- you are about to write a multi-step plan for it
Skip step 0 for a single read or a single CRUD call ("list my pods", "stop pod X", "what GPUs are available") — go straight to the lane. A matching golden path outranks this router's lane table: it was verified end to end on a real account, so where the two disagree, follow the path and treat the difference as a bug worth reporting.
- Conceptual question, or an unmade design choice (serverless vs pod? which
GPU? bake the model or mount a volume?) → read runpod-usage first, then continue with the answer.
- Run a common workload on a pod, or fix a template pod ("run ComfyUI /
PyTorch dev box", won't boot, missing models) → runpod-templates — check for an official prebuilt before planning any install, and let it route repairs.
- Write/iterate/ship your own code on Runpod GPUs → flash.
- Produce an artifact (download a model, build+push an image, create a repo
release, sync data to a volume) → companion-clis.
- Migrate existing code between Runpod API versions — "move us to REST v2",
"which Runpod API is this repo on?", "what breaks if we upgrade?" → runpod-migrate. (Calling the API to do something is a different job; that is the infra lanes below.)
- Manage infrastructure (create/list/update/delete pods, endpoints,
templates, volumes; list GPUs/data centers; run a serverless job; billing):
- Capability only the CLI has — **Hub,
send/receive, SSH keys,doctor,
model cache → runpodctl**.
- Otherwise, if the Runpod MCP tools are connected in this session
(create-pod, list-endpoints, … are available) → runpod-mcp.
- Otherwise (shell-only agent, no MCP) → runpodctl.
runpod-mcp vs runpodctl (the overlap)
Both drive the same Runpod API, so they overlap on infra CRUD. Choose by capability first, environment second:
- MCP wins on convenience for simple, structured operations — reads and basic
CRUD — when its tools are connected (typed params, no shell quoting).
- runpodctl takes over when an operation needs a capability MCP lacks — even
if MCP is connected — and is the only option for a shell-only agent or when the user wants a reproducible command.
Capability matrix (pick the preferred lane per operation):
| Operation | Preferred lane | Why |
|---|---|---|
| List/get anything; start/stop/restart/delete a pod; simple CRUD on endpoints, templates, volumes, registries; catalog; billing | runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | Simple structured ops — MCP is typed and convenient |
| Create a simple pod (one image + one GPU) | runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | Both handle it |
| Create a pod from a template or a CPU pod | runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | MCP's create-pod takes templateId (v2-only) and computeType: "CPU" |
| Create a pod with a multi-GPU priority list, or template + CPU together | runpodctl | MCP narrows to one GPU type, and rejects a template deploy for a CPU pod |
| Deploy from the Hub | runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | MCP has list-hub-repos + deploy-hub-repo |
File transfer (send/receive), SSH keys/info, `doctor` setup, model cache | runpodctl | MCP has no tool for these |
Invoke a serverless job (run/runsync/status/stream) | runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | Both lanes have first-class job commands now (runpodctl serverless run/status/health, v2.9.0+); MCP is typed, and only MCP streams a job's incremental output (stream-job) |
| Read pod or worker logs | either — runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl | Both lanes read them: MCP stream-pod-logs/stream-worker-logs return parsed frames; runpodctl pod logs/serverless logs emit json lines and --follow (v2.10.0+) |
Rule of thumb: default to MCP for the easy stuff, hand off to runpodctl the moment an op needs a flag/feature MCP doesn't expose.
Deploying a workload (the golden loop)
For any "get <X> running on Runpod" task, follow the development loop in runpod-usage/reference/development-loop.md: decide pod vs serverless → provision → set up (only if from-scratch) → verify → deliver → cost-guard + teardown. Two rules bind within it:
- Prefer a prebuilt template / Hub worker over building an image from scratch —
official pod templates are indexed in `runpod-templates`.
- **Before delivering, verify the workload with a real request from outside the pod/endpoint
— a "Running"/"ready" status does not mean it is serving.**
It branches to two sub-loops:
- Service you open at a URL (Ollama, ComfyUI, dev box) →
`runpod-usage/reference/pod-workflows.md` (ports + env + volume at creation, SSH-exec install, bind 0.0.0.0, poll the proxy URL). Execute in the runpodctl lane.
- Request/response API that scales to zero (Whisper, inference) →
`runpod-usage/reference/endpoint-workflows.md` (Hub worker vs flash vs custom image; invoke /run//runsync; poll job status).
Worked examples (golden paths)
This is step 0 of routing, not an appendix. Two dozen end-to-end scenarios (nearly all live-verified on a real account) live in `./golden-paths/README.md`, with the real commands and the observed output to copy from — plus a Gotchas and a Cost & cleanup section each, which is the part that is expensive to rediscover.
Match the task to a row below and open that path before you plan or call anything. A partial match is still worth opening: the closest path's ordering and gotchas usually transfer even when the model, GPU, or region does not. Only fall through to the lane tables above when nothing here is close.
| Want to… | Golden path |
|---|---|
| Run a server (Ollama/ComfyUI) on a pod at a URL | 01, 02 |
| Deploy a serverless model endpoint (Hub / flash / custom image) | 03, 05 |
| Serve a HuggingFace model without baking it in or a volume (host-cached) | 20 — model caching (`--model-reference`) |
| Call a ready hosted model (no deploy) | 11 — Public Endpoints |
| Fine-tune, then serve the result | 04, 08 |
| Interactive dev box (SSH / VS Code) | 06 |
| Move data pod → volume → serverless | 07 |
| Custom serverless when flash isn't enough (dual-mode image dev loop) | 09 |
| Build a minimal image for a target (pod vs serverless queue) | 22 (pod), 23 (queue); concepts in building-images |
| Decide what to bake into the image vs mount on a network volume | 25 — bake vs mount |
| Pick a network-volume storage tier (standard vs high-performance) | 21 — storage tiers |
| High availability / multi-region serverless (multi-volume + data sync) | 10, 19 (3-region) |
Stream output incrementally (/stream) | 12 |
| Tune autoscaling / raise per-worker throughput | 13 (autoscaling), 18 (concurrency) |
| Load-balancing / HTTP-server or WebSocket worker | 14 (LB), 17 (WebSocket) |
| Get notified on job completion (push, not poll) | 16 — webhooks |
| Check health / debug a failing endpoint | 15 — monitor & debug |
Multi-lane tasks
Sequence is always understand → produce artifacts → manage infra → verify, because infra can only reference artifacts that already exist. Keep each step in one lane, and switch lanes at credential boundaries.
Example — "deploy openai/gpt-oss-20b to a serverless endpoint":
- runpod-usage — serverless vs pod, GPU tier for 20B, bake vs mount vs cache.
- companion-clis —
hf download …,docker build --platform=linux/amd64 …,docker push. - runpod-mcp or runpodctl — create the endpoint referencing the image + GPU pool.
- Same infra lane — invoke the endpoint / check status to verify.
Auth
Everything is one key: `RUNPOD_API_KEY` (https://console.runpod.io/user/settings). Each lane just makes that key resolvable — runpodctl doctor, flash login, MCP stdio env var, or MCP hosted "Sign in with Runpod" (OAuth, no key on disk). Companion CLIs use their own credentials (HuggingFace token, GitHub auth, Docker Hub PAT, Runpod S3 keys for aws) — do not reuse RUNPOD_API_KEY for those.

