agricidaniel/claude-blog

blog-localize

Deep cultural adaptation of translated blog posts.

Voir la source
Document Skill original

Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.

Blog Localize, Cultural Deep-Adaptation

Takes a translated blog post and performs cultural adaptation so the result feels like it was written for the target market, not translated into it. This is the layer above blog-translate: it replaces examples, adjusts tone, swaps references, and localizes the entire reading experience.

Adapted from claude-blog-multilingual by Chris Mueller (Pro Hub Challenge, March 2026). Original: https://github.com/Chriss54/multilingual-int

Key References

  • ../blog-translate/references/cultural-adaptation.md, the shared cultural

profiles file with substitution tables for DACH, Francophone, Hispanic, Japanese, and a custom template. Do not duplicate this file.

When to Use

  • Right after blog-translate produces a base translation.
  • When existing translated content reads like "translated from English".
  • When targeting a specific market, not just a language.
  • When content needs local statistics, examples, and brand references.

Workflow

Phase 1: Locale Understanding

  1. Parse the locale code with the shared multilingual locale rules used by

blog-translate, blog-multilingual, and blog-locale-audit: ISO 639-1 language in lowercase, optional ISO 15924 script in title case, optional ISO 3166-1 Alpha-2 region in uppercase. Accept full codes (de-DE, fr-CA, es-MX, pt-BR, zh-Hant) and unambiguous plain language codes (de, fr). Require a region or explicit neutral mode for ambiguous language-only targets such as es, pt, and zh.

  1. Load the cultural profile from

../blog-translate/references/cultural-adaptation.md.

  • If the locale has a profile, use it.
  • If not, follow the "Custom-locale template" section in that reference

to build a minimal profile inline.

  1. Read the translated post only after resolving it inside the project

root/current working directory. Reject symlinked paths, traversal outside the root, files over 10 MB, and binary files. Then identify adaptation targets.

Phase 2: Cultural Audit

Scan for elements that signal foreign origin:

ElementWhat to look for
Brand examplesUS or UK brands with no relevance locally
Statistics sourcesUS-only studies and surveys
CTAsAmerican-style aggressive calls-to-action
IdiomsLiterally translated English expressions
Legal referencesForeign laws (CCPA, FTC) where local law applies (DSGVO, RGPD)
Cultural referencesForeign holidays, events, customs
Currency and pricingUSD without conversion or context
ToneToo casual or too formal for the target market
Address formInconsistent Sie/du, tu/vous, formal/informal

Output an audit report listing every target with severity (critical, recommended, optional).

Phase 3: Adaptation

3a. Example Substitution

Swap foreign examples for local equivalents:

  • Use WebSearch to find local case studies, brands, or scenarios.
  • Replace inline, preserving the same argument and structure.
  • Record source URL, access date, and rationale for every non-obvious local

replacement.

  • If no local equivalent exists, keep the original but add local context

("In the German market, the equivalent dynamic is X").

3b. Statistics Localization

  • Use primary or high-quality local sources for replacement statistics:

national statistics offices, regulators, official industry bodies, academic datasets, or named research reports with methodology.

  • Do not rely on generic WebSearch snippets as evidence. Fetch the cited page,

verify the figure and context, and record the source URL and date.

  • Fetch cited pages only after SSRF checks: allow https URLs only; reject

javascript:, data:, file:, localhost, loopback, private, link-local, multicast, and reserved IPs after DNS resolution; disable redirects or validate the final URL with the same checks; cap redirects, response size, and request time; log the final URL and access date.

  • If local data exists with comparable methodology, swap the source and the

figure together. Keep one named source per claim.

  • If local data is related but uses a different methodology or timeframe, do

not silently swap it. Keep the original claim scoped, or rewrite the claim to match the local source.

  • If not, keep the original stat but mark its geographic scope ("In the

US, ...").

  • Never strip source attribution.

3c. CTA Adaptation

Rewrite calls-to-action per the cultural profile:

  • Adjust aggressiveness level (DACH and JA prefer informational, US prefers

imperative).

  • Use culturally appropriate action verbs.
  • Adapt urgency framing.

3d. Tone Calibration

  • Match formality per profile (DACH defaults to Sie for B2B, du for B2C

lifestyle; FR defaults to vous; JA shifts register sharply by audience).

  • Ensure consistent formal or informal address throughout the entire

document.

  • Match local content-style conventions.

3e. Legal and Regulatory Context

  • Map legal references by issue and jurisdiction. Keep the original law when

the claim is specifically about US compliance. Only substitute when the local law addresses the same issue, such as CCPA to DSGVO in DE, RGPD in FR, LGPD in BR, LFPDPPP in MX, Ley 1581 in CO, or Ley 25.326 in AR.

  • Add local compliance notes where they help the reader.
  • Remove irrelevant foreign regulatory references.

3f. Brand Example Swaps (Quick Map)

Profiles in ../blog-translate/references/cultural-adaptation.md provide substitution tables. Common examples:

Source (US)DACHFRES (Spain)LATAMJA
WalmartMediaMarktCarrefourEl Corte InglésWalmart MXAeon
TargetSaturnAuchanHipercorLiverpoolIto-Yokado
FTCBundeskartellamtDGCCRFCNMCPROFECO (MX)JFTC
CCPADSGVORGPDRGPDLFPDPPP (MX), Ley 1581 (CO), Ley 25.326 (AR), LGPD (BR)APPI

Phase 4: Quality Verification

  • All critical adaptation targets addressed.
  • Tone is consistent throughout.
  • No remaining foreign-origin markers.
  • Statistics have valid sources (original or localized).
  • CTAs match cultural expectations.
  • Formal or informal address is consistent end to end.
  • Content still supports the same argument as the original.
  • SEO elements remain optimized beyond keyword placement: localized title and

meta, heading intent, slug, alt text, internal-link anchors, same-language canonical, hreflang compatibility, and schema inLanguage.

  • Word count is within the expected ratio for the language pair.

Phase 5: Save and Report

  1. Save the localized version. Default: write a reviewed copy as

{slug}-localized.{ext}. Only overwrite the translated file when the user asks for overwrite; before overwriting, create a timestamped backup and show a diff summary. Resolve every output path inside the project root and reject traversal, symlinked paths, or writes outside that root.

  1. Present the summary:
   ## Localization complete: [Title]

   ### Target locale: [locale-code] ([locale-name])

   ### Adaptations made
   | Type | Count | Examples |
   |------|-------|----------|
   | Brand examples | [N] | Walmart -> MediaMarkt |
   | Statistics | [N] | US survey -> DACH survey |
   | CTAs | [N] | "Buy now" -> "Jetzt entdecken" |
   | Tone adjustments | [N] | Casual -> Sie |
   | Legal references | [N] | CCPA -> DSGVO |
   | Cultural references | [N] | Thanksgiving -> Weihnachtsgeschaeft |

   ### Cultural fit score
   - Naturalness: [1-10]
   - Market relevance: [1-10]
   - Tone match: [1-10]
   - Overall: [N]/30

   ### Remaining recommendations
   - [Optional adaptations not applied]

Error Handling

ScenarioAction
No cultural profile for the localeBuild a minimal profile from the custom-locale template, proceed
File is not in the expected languageWarn the user, offer to translate first
No local statistics availableKeep the original stat with a geographic-scope note
Locale code ambiguous (e.g., pt)Ask: "Did you mean pt-BR (Brazil) or pt-PT (Portugal)?"

Cross-References

  • Pre-step (translation): /blog translate <file> --to <code>
  • QA across language versions: /blog locale-audit <directory>
  • One-command pipeline: /blog multilingual <topic> --languages <codes>
du même dépôt

Autres Skills

Tous les Skills
agricidaniel
Communauté

blog-factcheck

Verify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".

installations
2
GitHub Stars
2,1 k
Mis à jour
4 sept.
agricidaniel
Communauté

blog-write

Write new blog articles from scratch optimized for Google rankings and AI citations. Generates full articles with template selection, answer-first formatting, Key Takeaways summary box, information gain markers, evidence-backed explanations, sourced statistics, Pixabay/Unsplash images, built-in SVG chart generation, optional FAQ sections, internal linking zones, and proper heading hierarchy. Supports MDX, markdown, and HTML output. Use when user says "write blog", "new blog post", "create article", "write about", "draft blog", "generate blog post".

installations
2
GitHub Stars
2,1 k
Mis à jour
4 sept.
agricidaniel
Communauté

blog

Full-lifecycle blog engine with 31 sub-skills, 12 templates, 100-point scoring, and 5 agents. Routes requests to the right sub-skill: writing, rewriting, analysis, outlines, audits, schema, charts, images, repurposing, AI citation SEO, FLOW prompts, topic clusters, and multilingual publishing. Optimized for Google rankings, E-E-A-T, and AI citations. Supports any platform. Use when user says "blog", "blog post", "blog audit", "topic cluster", "multilingual blog", or any /blog subcommand.

installations
14
GitHub Stars
2,1 k
Mis à jour
4 sept.
agricidaniel
Communauté

blog-analyze

Audit and score blog posts on a 5-category 100-point scoring system covering content quality, SEO optimization, E-E-A-T signals, technical elements, and AI citation readiness. Includes advisory editorial style diagnostics (sentence-length variation, configured phrase lists, vocabulary sampling) that never infer authorship or affect scoring. Supports export formats (markdown, JSON, table) and batch analysis with sorting. Generates prioritized recommendations (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with specific fixes. Works with any format (MDX, markdown, HTML, URL). Use when user says "analyze blog", "audit blog", "blog score", "check blog quality", "blog review", "rate this blog", "blog health check".

installations
14
GitHub Stars
2,1 k
Mis à jour
4 sept.