Mode d’emploi
- Copiez la commande et examinez le paquet avant de l’installer dans votre environnement agent.
- Consultez le document original pour les outils, identifiants et environnements requis.
- Décrivez les entrées et le livrable souhaité ; comparez la sortie aux sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/enitrat/skill-issue --skill github-issueAvant de commencer
- L’installation n’inclut ni abonnement au modèle, ni quota API, ni accès aux fichiers.
- Étoiles et installations reflètent l’activité, pas un test indépendant de qualité ou de sécurité.
Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.
GitHub issues
The reader is a teammate who was not in the conversation. The issue gives them a model of the problem and the system it lives in, then hands them the work. They own the solution. The issue points; it does not prescribe.
Only what matters is written. A line earns its place when the reader would get the problem wrong without it. When unsure, cut.
Title
Conventional commit format, validated by the script (--skip-validation for repos with another convention): <type>(<scope>): <description>, e.g. fix(api): resolve race condition in request handler.
Body
| Shape | When | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Task | We know what to do | What · Why · How |
| Open question | The fix is a decision | Question · What we found · Options |
| Bug | Behaviour differs from expected | What happens · Expected · How to reproduce |
- What: the change in product terms. What a user or caller can do afterwards.
- Why: the concrete problem, then the system explained so the reader gets it in
one read: terms defined once, what happens when, one real example link.
- How: "Guidance only." and 2–5 pointers (prior art, a link, a constraint that
rules out an obvious approach). Open points stay listed as open.
- Options: numbered, one line each with its cost, ending in "Something else?".
Cut implementation plans, edge-case lists, acceptance-criteria and testing-plan checklists, facts the reader can't check, and history. Prune each line: would the reader get the problem wrong without it? Then tighten with /pstack:unslop.
Script
scripts/gh_issue.py, run with uv run. Create and push show a preview and ask first; --yes skips it.
| Task | Command | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Start a body | `init --template task\ | question\ | bug -o /tmp/issue.md` |
| Create | create owner/repo --title "…" --body-file /tmp/issue.md [--labels a,b] [--assignees @me] [--milestone M] [--project P] | ||
| Create a sub-issue | create-sub owner/repo --parent 10 --title "…" --body-file … | ||
| Link existing | link owner/repo --parent 10 --child 42 | ||
| Edit | edit owner/repo 123 [--title "…"] [--body-file …] | ||
| View / list | view owner/repo 123 · list owner/repo [--labels bug] | ||
| Sub-issues, incl. cross-repo | list-subissues owner/repo 123 [--json] | ||
| Comment / label / close | comment owner/repo 123 "…" · labels owner/repo 123 --add a,b · close owner/repo 123 --reason completed |
Round trip. dump-tree owner/repo 123 ./issues/ writes the issue and its sub-issues as markdown with YAML frontmatter (title, repo, number, labels, assignees, milestone, parent). Edit locally, then push ./issues/<file>.md: it updates the issue when number is set and creates one otherwise.
