posthog/ai-plugin

validating-and-publishing-canvases

Validate and publish a canvas source project safely: the source-project shape, declared capabilities, reading the current version pointer, iterating on validation diagnostics, guarded publishing with expectedcurrentversionid, staging a draft build and promo…

Voir la source
Document Skill original

Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.

Validating and publishing canvases

A canvas's source lives in PostHog, versioned per publish. Publishing is guarded: every edit is based on a specific version, and the server refuses to overwrite newer work. Every publish queues a server-side build, and the canvas renders the last successful build.

The source project

canvas-source-retrieve returns:

  • projectschemaVersion (1), files (path → content), entryHtml ("index.html"),

dependencies (exact platform-pinned versions), canvasSdkVersion, capabilities.

  • current_version_id — the version your edits are based on. Keep it; the publish needs it.

It is null for a canvas that has never been published — pass that null on the first publish.

Keep index.html and dependencies exactly as returned. You may add relative source files and admitted assets to the project. Use ?worker for a self-contained module worker and represent binary assets as base64 entries in assets; new npm dependencies or dependency-version drift fail validation.

Declare capabilities

The host enforces project.capabilities at runtime, so an undeclared ph call builds fine and then dies in the rendered canvas. Declare:

  • capabilities.posthog.insights — every insight short id the canvas passes to ph.loadInsight.
  • capabilities.posthog.captureEvents — every event name it passes to ph.capture.
  • capabilities.posthog.inlineQueries: true — when it calls ph.query at all.
  • capabilities.posthog.agentRequests: true — when it calls ph.agent.request.
  • capabilities.network.origins — each exact HTTPS origin used by fetch, XMLHttpRequest, or an

external stylesheet, image, font, media file, or frame. Remote scripts remain blocked. Do not include paths, credentials, queries, fragments, or wildcards. The host must be public: loopback and private IPs, single-label names like intranet, and the .local, .localhost, .internal, and .home.arpa suffixes are all rejected, so a local dev host such as https://localhost:8010 fails validation with an invalid_network_origin error. Data sent to a declared origin leaves PostHog and appears in the capability review before promotion.

Before validation, inventory every literal external URL in every source file. Classify navigation links and ph.openExternal() URLs as navigation; they do not need a network origin. For every request or resource URL, declare its scheme + host + optional port only. Include every origin a request redirects to and every secondary origin a stylesheet references for fonts or images. Never infer that one CDN hostname covers another.

Validation rejects undeclared literal calls and resource URLs (capability_missing_* diagnostics) so you can fix them before publishing. Dynamic URLs and redirect destinations cannot be inferred, so the inventory is still required even when validation is clean.

Validate until clean

canvas-validate-create is side-effect free; call it as often as needed. Diagnostics carry severity, a stable code, a message, and (for file-specific problems) path and line:

  • error diagnostics block publishing — fix all of them. Common ones: import_not_allowed

(bare imports are limited to the dependencies returned in the source project), forbidden_dynamic_import / forbidden_require / forbidden_inline_script, invalid_path, capability_missing_insight / capability_missing_capture_event / capability_missing_inline_queries / capability_missing_agent_requests / capability_missing_network_origin, dependency_not_admitted / dependency_version_mismatch, and path/size violations.

  • warning diagnostics don't block, but heed them: network_fetch / network_xhr mean the code

reaches for the network directly. Declare the exact HTTPS origin or use the ph bridge.

Publish guarded

Publishing goes live immediately, so it is for a canvas's first version or for a change the user explicitly asked to make live. A canvas that already has a live version defaults to a draft instead — see "Draft, then promote" below.

Two ways to publish, both guarded:

  • Whole projectcanvas-publish-create with the complete project.
  • Per-file editscanvas-edit-create with operations (each sets a

file's complete content, or deletes it with content: null). Prefer this for small changes to a large project; the guard is mandatory here because a diff's meaning depends on its base.

For a whole-project publish with canvas-publish-create:

  • Always pass expected_current_version_id — the current_version_id you read (or explicit

null on a first publish). Unguarded publishes can silently clobber concurrent edits.

  • Include a short prompt describing the change; it becomes the version-history entry's label.
  • Pass name only to rename the canvas (e.g. a first build of an untitled canvas).
  • Publish once per requested change. If the user asks for another edit afterwards, re-read the

source (the head may have moved) and publish again — don't batch unrelated changes into one version, and don't publish work-in-progress after every micro-edit.

  • A 429 means the team's build capacity is temporarily exhausted. Wait ~30 seconds and retry the

same publish; nothing was saved.

The response returns the new current_version_id.

After publishing: wait for the build

A publish queues a server-side build of the version. The canvas does not update until the build is ready, and nobody else is watching the result — you own it. Poll canvas-builds-retrieve every few seconds (up to ~2 minutes) until the build you queued is terminal:

  • queued/building — in progress; poll again shortly.
  • ready — the canvas's published_build_id advances to this build (unless a newer publish

superseded it first). The task's canvas work is done.

  • failed — read the build's error diagnostics, fix the project, and publish again. A failed

build never replaces the last good one, so the canvas keeps rendering the previous version — finishing the task here would leave the user with a stale canvas and a silent failure.

Runtime error reports (filed on the authoring task when a rendered canvas throws) name the build they came from. A report from an older build id is history, not evidence about your current code — check it against the build you just published before acting on it. In particular, a report that a documented ph API is undefined (e.g. ph.state) means that artifact was baked by an older host runtime: republish so a current build replaces it. Never "fix" it by removing the API or its capability declaration.

Draft, then promote

Publishing goes live the moment its build is ready. For a canvas that already has a live version, that is not the default: stage the change as a draft and let the user promote it. Publish directly only for a canvas's first version (nothing is live to protect) or when the user explicitly asked to make the change live. A draft is a real, buildable version that is never the head: the live canvas keeps rendering the current version until someone promotes the draft. This is different from canvas-validate-create, which only compile-checks and produces no build or preview.

  1. Stagecanvas-draft-create with the complete project (same shape, capabilities, and

validation as a publish). No expected_current_version_id: a draft is based on nothing and conflicts with nothing. The response returns the draft's version_id, its queued build, and capability_widening — the insights, capture events, inline queries, and network origins the draft declares beyond the live version. Surface a non-empty widening to the user before promoting; it is the access the change would newly grant.

  1. Wait for the build — poll canvas-builds-retrieve until the draft's build is terminal, the

same way you would after a publish. A failed draft build is fixed by staging a new draft, not by promoting.

  1. Preview — read the draft's files with canvas-source-retrieve passing its version_id; once

its build is ready the app renders that draft when the version is opened. The draft is not in canvas-versions-retrieve (that lists published history only) and cannot be reverted onto — list pending drafts with canvas-drafts-retrieve.

  1. Promote — only when the user approved the draft or explicitly asked to go live; the

default is to stop after staging and report the draft. canvas-promote-create makes the draft the live head. Pass expected_current_version_id (the live current_version_id from canvas-source-retrieve); it is guarded exactly like a publish and 409s on a moved head (recover as below). A draft whose build is still ready goes live with no rebuild; otherwise a fresh build is queued, so wait for it as in step 2. Promote is the only path from a draft to live.

Recovering from 409 version_conflict

A 409 means the canvas moved past your base — a concurrent publish or a revert. The response includes the live current_version_id. Never retry unguarded to force your version through:

  1. Re-read the source with canvas-source-retrieve.
  2. Re-apply your edits to the fresh source (the new head may contain someone else's changes —

preserve them).

  1. Publish again with the new current_version_id.

Version history semantics

Each publish appends a full source version and moves the head pointer; users can revert to older versions in the app (which republishes and rebuilds them). The guard matters because basing your publish on the version you actually read is what keeps a user's revert, another agent's publish, and your edit from silently erasing each other.

du même dépôt

Autres Skills

Tous les Skills
posthog
Officiel

assessing-heatmaps

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements.\nTRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

installations
1
GitHub Stars
80
Mis à jour
4 sept.
posthog
Officiel

auditing-endpoints

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
80
Mis à jour
4 sept.
posthog
Officiel

auditing-experiments-flags

Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations. Read when the user asks to audit, health-check, or review experiments or feature flags, check flag hygiene, or verify experiment setup.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
80
Mis à jour
4 sept.
posthog
Officiel

authoring-data-quality-checks

Adds and runs data quality checks (dbt-test style assertions) on a project's warehouse tables and saved-query views: not-null, uniqueness, accepted values, referential integrity, row-count bounds, freshness, and custom HogQL. Use when asked to test a model, validate a view, check for nulls or duplicates, add data quality checks, find out why a number looks wrong, or judge whether a warehouse table is trustworthy before using it in an analysis. To describe what data means (metrics, certifications, joins), see setting-up-data-catalog instead. Trigger terms: data quality, data test, dbt test, not null check, uniqueness check, freshness check, referential integrity, row count check, validate model, is this table trustworthy.

installations
1
GitHub Stars
80
Mis à jour
4 sept.