Mode d’emploi
- Copiez la commande et examinez le paquet avant de l’installer dans votre environnement agent.
- Consultez le document original pour les outils, identifiants et environnements requis.
- Décrivez les entrées et le livrable souhaité ; comparez la sortie aux sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/secondsky/claude-skills --skill plan-interviewAvant de commencer
- L’installation n’inclut ni abonnement au modèle, ni quota API, ni accès aux fichiers.
- Étoiles et installations reflètent l’activité, pas un test indépendant de qualité ou de sécurité.
Document Skill original
Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.
Plan Interview Skill
Transform rough plans into comprehensive, implementation-ready specifications through adaptive, structured interviews.
When to Use
- Converting a plan or idea into a detailed specification
- Gathering requirements through structured questioning
- Transforming rough documentation into implementation-ready specs
- Ensuring all edge cases, risks, and stakeholders are considered before implementation
Available Components
Command: /plan-interview:interview [plan-file]
Adaptive interview that calibrates depth based on plan complexity:
| Complexity | Signals | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Simple | Single feature, clear scope | 10-15 |
| Moderate | Multi-component, some integrations | 18-23 |
| Complex | Cross-system, many stakeholders | 22-28 |
Usage:
bash
/plan-interview:interview docs/feature-plan.md
# Output: docs/feature-plan-spec.mdAgent: spec-reviewer
Autonomous quality analysis of specifications across 4 dimensions:
- Completeness (25 pts) - All sections populated?
- Consistency (25 pts) - No contradictions?
- Clarity (25 pts) - No ambiguous language?
- Edge Cases (25 pts) - Error handling defined?
Triggers when you say "review my spec" or "check specification quality".
Interview Phases
- Foundations & Scope - Stakeholders, success criteria, constraints, MVP scope
- Technical Deep-Dive - Architecture, data models, scalability, security
- User Experience - Personas, flows, cognitive load, error recovery
- Risks & Tradeoffs - Risk categorization, blast radius, contingency plans
- Operationalization - Testing, deployment, monitoring
- Wrap-Up (optional) - Only for complex plans with remaining gaps
Interview Philosophy
Core Principle: Depth over breadth. Better to deeply understand critical aspects than superficially cover everything.
Key Techniques:
- Non-obvious questions - Skip what the plan already answers
- Edge probing - What happens in unusual cases?
- Assumption surfacing - Make implicit beliefs explicit
- Contradiction detection - Flag when answers don't align
- Adaptive depth - Probe deeper on complex areas, move faster on clear ones
Spec Output Structure
Generated specs include:
- Overview (problem, solution, success criteria, stakeholders)
- Functional and non-functional requirements
- Technical design (architecture, data models, APIs, security)
- User experience (personas, flows, states, edge cases)
- Risks and mitigations (risk register, tradeoffs, contingency plans)
- Implementation notes (key decisions, dependencies, migration)
- Operationalization (testing, deployment, monitoring)
- Open questions and out-of-scope items
- Phasing (MVP vs future)
References
Load these for deeper guidance during interviews:
references/phase-1-clarifications.md- Foundations questions and pitfallsreferences/phase-2-technical.md- Architecture discussion patternsreferences/phase-3-ux.md- Persona development, UX patternsreferences/phase-4-risks.md- Risk assessment frameworksreferences/interview-techniques.md- Cross-cutting interview skillsreferences/example-spec.md- Annotated high-quality spec example
