Mode d’emploi
- Copiez la commande et examinez le paquet avant de l’installer dans votre environnement agent.
- Consultez le document original pour les outils, identifiants et environnements requis.
- Décrivez les entrées et le livrable souhaité ; comparez la sortie aux sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill writing-testsAvant de commencer
- L’installation n’inclut ni abonnement au modèle, ni quota API, ni accès aux fichiers.
- Étoiles et installations reflètent l’activité, pas un test indépendant de qualité ou de sécurité.
Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.
Writing Tests
Use this skill when the user asks to add tests to existing code, improve test coverage, or write tests for a specific file or module.
Steps
- Detect the test setup — check what's already configured:
# Check package.json for test runner
cat package.json | grep -E "jest|vitest|mocha|playwright|cypress"Look for config files: vitest.config.ts, jest.config.ts, playwright.config.ts, .mocharc.*. Check for existing test files to understand the project's test patterns and conventions.
- If no test runner exists — set one up:
npm install -D vitest @testing-library/react @testing-library/jest-domAdd a test script to package.json:
{ "test": "vitest run", "test:watch": "vitest" }- Analyze the target code — read the file(s) to test and identify:
- Public API: exported functions, classes, components, hooks
- Code paths: conditionals, error handling, edge cases
- Dependencies: external services, databases, APIs that need mocking
- Side effects: file I/O, network calls, DOM mutations
- Create the test file — place it next to the source file or in a
__tests__/directory, matching the project's convention:
src/utils/format.ts→src/utils/format.test.tssrc/components/Button.tsx→src/components/Button.test.tsx
- Write tests following this structure:
import { describe, it, expect, vi } from "vitest";
describe("functionName", () => {
// Happy path
it("returns formatted output for valid input", () => { ... });
// Edge cases
it("handles empty string", () => { ... });
it("handles null/undefined input", () => { ... });
// Error cases
it("throws on invalid argument", () => { ... });
// Boundary conditions
it("handles maximum length input", () => { ... });
});- Mock external dependencies — don't make real API calls or database queries in unit tests:
vi.mock("@/lib/db", () => ({
query: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1, name: "test" }]),
}));For React components, mock hooks that fetch data:
vi.mock("@/hooks/useUser", () => ({
useUser: () => ({ user: { name: "Test" }, isLoading: false }),
}));- Test React components with Testing Library:
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from "@testing-library/react";
it("renders the button and handles click", () => {
const onClick = vi.fn();
render(<Button onClick={onClick}>Click me</Button>);
fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: "Click me" }));
expect(onClick).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
});- Run the tests and verify they pass:
npm testIf any fail, fix the test or the code (depending on whether the test expectation or the implementation is wrong).
What to Test
- Always test: public API, error handling, edge cases (empty, null, zero, negative), state transitions, async behavior
- Skip testing: private implementation details, third-party library internals, simple getters/setters, type-only code
Notes
- Match the project's existing test style — if they use
test()instead ofit(), follow that. - Don't test implementation details — test behavior and outputs, not internal method calls.
- Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario: "returns 0 when cart is empty" not "test1".
- One assertion concept per test — multiple
expectcalls are fine if they verify the same behavior. - For async code, always
awaitthe result or useresolves/rejectsmatchers.



