vincenzoimp/academic-research-skills

explore-sota

Use when building or expanding the SOTA — from an idea, keywords, seed papers, or the existing collection — through MCP search, citation chasing, triage, and digestion of accepted papers.

Voir la source

Mode d’emploi

  1. Copiez la commande et examinez le paquet avant de l’installer dans votre environnement agent.
  2. Consultez le document original pour les outils, identifiants et environnements requis.
  3. Décrivez les entrées et le livrable souhaité ; comparez la sortie aux sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/vincenzoimp/academic-research-skills --skill explore-sota

Avant de commencer

  • L’installation n’inclut ni abonnement au modèle, ni quota API, ni accès aux fichiers.
  • Étoiles et installations reflètent l’activité, pas un test indépendant de qualité ou de sécurité.
Document Skill original

Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.

Explore SOTA

Run the SOTA exploration loop: discover candidate papers, triage them in sota/queue.md, digest the accepted ones, and repeat until the declared stopping rule is met. Works for long autonomous sessions and for small targeted expansions alike.

Read First

  • sota/README.md — digestion rules and formats
  • sota/queue.md — the Scope block and the current frontier
  • references/citation-chasing.md — frontier discipline, anti-echo-chamber

rules, review scales

MCP Preflight (hard gate)

Same gate as digest-paper: by capability, never by API key. arxiv must respond AND at least one of semantic-scholar, dblp, or openalex. If the gate is unmet: STOP and report. A missing key only throttles; a reachable source being down degrades the cross-check, not a stop. No fallback to model memory or web scraping.

Procedure

  1. Scope. Read the Scope block at the top of sota/queue.md. If empty

or stale, write it now: research question, keywords/synonyms/adjacent terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria, review scale (quick-scan ~8–15 papers / focused-sota ~20–40 / full-survey 50+), stopping rule. In an interactive session confirm it with the user; in an autonomous session derive it from README.md and record it before searching.

  1. Seeds. Build a diversified seed set: user-named papers, already

digested papers, seminal works found via MCP search, recent frontier papers. Never start from a single author group, venue, or survey.

  1. Search. Run keyword queries on every configured scholarly MCP — the

always-on arxiv, semantic-scholar, dblp, and the paper-search aggregator, plus openalex when enabled. Short, high-signal queries; record productive terms in the Scope block.

  1. Chase. For each digested seed, fetch outgoing references and

incoming citations via semantic-scholar — one hop at a time, per references/citation-chasing.md.

  1. Dedupe. Before adding a candidate to the queue, check it is not in

sota/index.md or already in sota/queue.md (match DOI, arXiv id, S2 id, then title + first author + year).

  1. Triage. Add each new candidate to queue.md with provenance

("found via") and decide against the criteria: accepted, rejected: <reason>, or pending. A candidate no MCP can resolve gets unresolvable-via-mcp and is never cited.

  1. Digest. For each accepted candidate, run the digest-paper skill

procedure (all-or-nothing). New digests yield new citation leads — feed them back into the queue.

  1. Learn. After each digestion round, add newly learned terminology,

benchmarks, venues, and author groups to the scope terms and re-search.

  1. Stop. Before declaring saturation, run the anti-echo-chamber checks

in references/citation-chasing.md. Stop at saturation (a hop yields mostly duplicates or out-of-scope work) or at the declared budget — in that case record the unexpanded frontier as pending rows, never silently.

  1. Run make check and leave no untriaged row before ending the session.

Rules

  • Every candidate enters queue.md before any digestion decision; the

queue is the only frontier record.

  • Rejections always carry a reason tied to the exclusion criteria.
  • Citation counts and graph centrality are discovery signals, not

relevance or quality judgments.

  • Never pad toward the paper budget: scale targets are budgets, not goals.

Done When

  • No pending row remains, or the unexpanded frontier is explicitly

recorded and reported to the user

  • The Scope block reflects the final criteria and the saturation/budget

outcome

  • make check passes

Tâches connexes

du même dépôt

Autres Skills

Tous les Skills