Mode d’emploi
- Copiez la commande et examinez le paquet avant de l’installer dans votre environnement agent.
- Consultez le document original pour les outils, identifiants et environnements requis.
- Décrivez les entrées et le livrable souhaité ; comparez la sortie aux sources.
npx skills add https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp --skill deep-interviewAvant de commencer
- L’installation n’inclut ni abonnement au modèle, ni quota API, ni accès aux fichiers.
- Étoiles et installations reflètent l’activité, pas un test indépendant de qualité ou de sécurité.
Rendu depuis le dépôt source en conservant titres, exemples, code, tableaux, liens et images.
Deep Interview
Ouroboros-inspired Socratic questioning with mathematical ambiguity scoring. Replaces vague ideas with crystal-clear specifications by asking targeted questions that expose hidden assumptions.
Pipeline
deep-interview → ralplan (consensus refinement) → omg-autopilot (execution)
When to Use
- User has a vague idea and wants thorough requirements gathering
- Task is complex enough that jumping to code would waste cycles
- User wants mathematically-validated clarity before execution
When NOT to Use
- Detailed specific request with file paths → execute directly
- Quick fix → delegate to @executor or
/ralph - User says "just do it" → respect their intent
Phases
Phase 1: Initialize
- Parse the user's idea
- Detect brownfield vs greenfield (use @explore to check codebase)
- For brownfield: map relevant codebase areas
- Initialize ambiguity score at 100%
Phase 2: Interview Loop
Repeat until ambiguity <= 20% or user exits early:
- Generate question targeting the WEAKEST clarity dimension
- Ask ONE question at a time with current ambiguity context
- Score ambiguity across dimensions:
- Goal Clarity (40% weight for greenfield, 35% brownfield)
- Constraint Clarity (30% / 25%)
- Success Criteria (30% / 25%)
- Context Clarity (N/A / 15% for brownfield)
- Report progress with dimension scores and gaps
- Track ontology (key entities, stability ratio)
Phase 3: Challenge Agents
- Round 4+: Contrarian - challenge core assumptions
- Round 6+: Simplifier - probe for complexity removal
- Round 8+: Ontologist - find the essence (if ambiguity > 30%)
Phase 4: Crystallize Spec
When ambiguity <= threshold, generate spec to .omc/specs/deep-interview-{slug}.md:
- Goal, Constraints, Non-Goals, Acceptance Criteria
- Assumptions Exposed & Resolved
- Ontology (Key Entities) with convergence tracking
- Interview Transcript
Phase 5: Execution Bridge
Present options:
- Ralplan → OMG Autopilot (Recommended): consensus-refine then execute
- Execute with omg-autopilot (skip ralplan)
- Execute with ralph: persistence loop
- Execute with team: parallel agents
- Refine further: continue interviewing
Rules
- Ask ONE question at a time
- Target the WEAKEST clarity dimension each round
- Gather codebase facts via @explore BEFORE asking user
- Score ambiguity after every answer
- Do not proceed until ambiguity <= threshold (default 20%)
- Hard cap at 20 rounds, soft warning at 10

