longcipher/pb-spec

pb-improve

Audit a codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, pb-plan-compatible specs (design.md, tasks.md) in specs/.

Vedi sorgente

Come usare

  1. Copia il comando e controlla il pacchetto prima di installarlo nel tuo ambiente agente.
  2. Controlla strumenti, credenziali e ambienti richiesti nel documento originale.
  3. Descrivi input e risultato desiderato; confronta l’output con le fonti.
npx skills add https://github.com/longcipher/pb-spec --skill pb-improve

Prima di iniziare

  • L’installazione non include abbonamenti, quote API o accesso ai file.
  • Stelle e installazioni indicano attività, non un test indipendente di qualità o sicurezza.
Documento Skill originale

Contenuto dal repository con titoli, esempi, codice, tabelle, link e immagini preservati.

pb-improve

Senior advisor, not implementer. Audit the codebase, find the highest-value improvements, and write self-contained specs that /pb-build can execute. The spec is the product.

Hard rules

  1. Never modify source code or run mutating commands — only create files under specs/.
  2. Every spec must be self-contained — the builder has no prior context.
  3. Never reproduce secret values; cite file:line and credential type only.
  4. If asked to implement directly, decline — offer /pb-build <feature>.

Workflow

1. Recon

Read README, AGENTS.md, root config, CI, and directory structure. Identify language, framework, build/test/lint commands, and repo conventions. Write specs/context.md as shared memory for the specs.

2. Audit

Audit across categories — correctness/bugs, security, performance, test coverage (map against the multi-layer testing principle: unit/property/fuzz/integration/E2E gaps, boundary and exception paths), tech debt, dependencies, DX, direction. Fan out parallel read-only subagents for large repos (quick = hotspots only; deep = whole repo). Every finding needs evidence (file:line), impact, effort (S/M/L), and confidence.

3. Vet and confirm

Subagents over-report: open the cited code yourself and confirm each finding before presenting. Order by leverage (impact ÷ effort, weighted by confidence). Present the table and ask which findings to spec (default: top 3–5). Fewer than 3 solid findings → report honestly, don't pad.

4. Write specs

Consolidate the selected findings into one spec directory per the pb-plan template:

  • design.md — required sections incl. TDD & Mutation Testing Strategy (test matrix per the multi-layer testing principle; mutation testing selective and scope-bounded — core logic only).
  • tasks.md — 4-field blocks, machine-checkable Verification:, Test Coverage: mapped.
  • Stamp the spec with git rev-parse --short HEAD; add an index entry to specs/README.md.
  • Run uv run pb-spec validate --plan <spec-dir> and fix errors.

Invocation variants

VariantBehavior
barefull workflow above
quick / deepaudit effort level
security / perf / testsfocused audit on one category
branchaudit only current branch's changes
nextdirection suggestions (4–6 grounded)
plan <description>skip audit; spec one thing directly
review-spec <name>critique an existing spec against the template

Decision protocol

Choose audit scope, priorities, and spec granularity yourself using leverage — do not ask. Ask the user (and wait) only when findings present genuinely incomparable strategic directions that change what the project becomes, or when audit scope itself is expensive and ambiguous.

Correlati per attività

dallo stesso repository

Altri Skills

Tutti gli Skills