asyrafhussin/agent-skills

prd-writing

Step-by-step workflow for writing Product Requirements Documents.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/asyrafhussin/agent-skills --skill prd-writing

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

PRD Writing

Step-by-step workflow for writing clear, actionable Product Requirements Documents. Follow the 6-step process below, using the 25 rules across 7 categories as supporting knowledge.

Metadata

  • Version: 1.0.0
  • Rule Count: 25 rules across 7 categories
  • License: MIT

Workflow

Follow these steps in order. Skip a step only if the user has already provided that information. Do NOT start drafting before completing discovery.

Step 1: Assess Project State

Determine what you're working with:

  • Existing project — code exists → explore the codebase first (models, routes, controllers, auth, patterns). See disc-codebase-exploration.
  • Empty/greenfield project — no code yet → ask the user what they want to build first. Brainstorm together until the product idea and core features are clear, then ask about planned stack, architecture decisions, and constraints.

Step 2: Ask Clarifying Questions

Ask 3-5 targeted questions to fill knowledge gaps. Use lettered options (A/B/C) when there are clear choices, and open-ended questions when you need free-text answers. Focus on:

  1. Problem — What problem are we solving? Why now?
  2. Users — Who are the target users?
  3. Scope — What should it NOT do?
  4. Success — How do we know it's done?
  5. Constraints — Timeline, budget, team size?

Mark unknowns as TBD, not assumptions. See disc-clarifying-questions.

Step 3: Draft the PRD

Use the template from struct-prd-template and fill in all 12 sections:

  1. Executive Summary — 1 paragraph: problem, solution, impact
  2. Problem Statement — what, who, evidence, why now
  3. Goals & Success Metrics — 3-5 measurable KPIs
  4. User Personas — primary and secondary with roles/goals/pain points
  5. User Stories & Acceptance Criteria — "As a / I want / So that" with checkboxes
  6. Functional Requirements — numbered FR-1, FR-2, etc.
  7. Non-Functional Requirements — performance, security, accessibility with specific numbers
  8. Technical Specifications — data model, auth, routes, integrations
  9. Out of Scope — what we're NOT building and why
  10. Non-Goals — what we're NOT optimizing for
  11. Dependencies & Risks — blockers with owners and mitigations
  12. Open Questions — unresolved items with owners and due dates

Key rules to follow while drafting:

  • Start with the problem, not the solution (disc-problem-first)
  • Replace vague language with numbers (metric-no-vague-language)
  • Every requirement must be testable (quality-acceptance-criteria)
  • Use Given/When/Then for complex acceptance criteria

Step 4: Present for Review

Show the draft to the user. Ask specifically:

  • Does the problem statement match your understanding?
  • Are user stories missing any workflows?
  • Are the scope boundaries correct?
  • Any open questions I should resolve?

Step 5: Revise Based on Feedback

Incorporate feedback, resolve open questions, and update the PRD. Add a review history entry if the PRD will be shared with a team.

Step 6: Save the PRD

Save to docs/prd/{feature-name}.md using kebab-case naming. Include frontmatter:

markdown
---
title: Feature Name
status: draft
author: Author Name
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
---

Rules Reference

The 25 rules below provide detailed guidance for each step. Read them when you need deeper context.

1. Discovery (CRITICAL)

  • disc-problem-first - Start with the problem, not the solution
  • disc-clarifying-questions - Ask clarifying questions before writing
  • disc-codebase-exploration - Explore the codebase before drafting
  • disc-stakeholder-alignment - Align with stakeholders on goals and constraints

2. Structure (CRITICAL)

  • struct-standard-sections - Use standardized PRD sections
  • struct-executive-summary - Write a concise executive summary
  • struct-prd-template - Provide a ready-to-use PRD template
  • struct-output-location - Save PRDs to a consistent file location
  • struct-single-source-of-truth - PRD is the definitive reference for a feature

3. Requirements (HIGH)

  • req-user-personas - Define target user personas
  • req-user-stories - Write user stories with acceptance criteria
  • req-functional - Define specific functional requirements
  • req-non-functional - Define non-functional requirements

4. Scope (HIGH)

  • scope-out-of-scope - Explicitly define what is out of scope
  • scope-non-goals - List non-goals to protect timeline
  • scope-dependencies - Identify dependencies and blockers

5. Metrics (HIGH)

  • metric-measurable-success - Define measurable success criteria
  • metric-no-vague-language - Replace vague terms with quantifiable benchmarks
  • metric-kpis - Define 3-5 key performance indicators

6. Technical (MEDIUM)

  • tech-data-model - Document the data model and relationships
  • tech-auth-model - Define authentication and authorization
  • tech-api-routes - Document API and route structure
  • tech-integration-points - Identify third-party integrations

7. Quality (MEDIUM)

  • quality-acceptance-criteria - Write testable acceptance criteria
  • quality-iterative-review - Iterate with feedback before finalizing

References

Full Compiled Document

For the complete guide with all rules expanded: AGENTS.md

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
asyrafhussin
コミュニティ

laravel-inertia-react

Laravel + Inertia.js + React integration patterns. Use when building Inertia page components, handling forms with useForm, managing shared data, or implementing persistent layouts. Triggers on tasks involving Inertia.js, page props, form handling, or Laravel React integration.

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
90
更新日
8月27日
asyrafhussin
コミュニティ

react-vite-best-practices

React and Vite performance optimization guidelines. Use when writing, reviewing, or optimizing React components built with Vite. Triggers on tasks involving Vite configuration, build optimization, code splitting, lazy loading, HMR, bundle size, or React performance.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
90
更新日
8月27日
asyrafhussin
コミュニティ

code-slop

Detect AI-generated code patterns ("slop") in PHP/Laravel and TypeScript/React source — comment narration, generic naming, premature interfaces, defensive overdose, mock-everything tests, and the absence of human "scars". Use when reviewing AI-assisted PRs, auditing code for taste/quality (not metrics — that's technical-debt), or hardening a code-review checklist. Triggers on "review for AI slop", "find AI patterns", "check code feels human", "audit code-quality taste".

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
89
更新日
8月27日
asyrafhussin
コミュニティ

technical-debt

Technical debt inventory, prioritization, and audit for PHP/Laravel (MySQL) and Node/TypeScript/React projects. Use when assessing code health, identifying refactoring candidates, planning debt paydown, or auditing a codebase for accumulated debt. Triggers on "audit technical debt", "find tech debt", "debt inventory", "what should we refactor first", or tasks involving code health, security debt, performance debt, data debt, observability debt, debt prioritization, or remediation planning.

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
89
更新日
8月27日