daymade/claude-code-skills

product-analysis

Multi-path parallel product analysis with cross-model test-time compute scaling.

ソースを見る
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Product Analysis

Multi-path parallel product analysis that combines Claude Code agent teams and Codex CLI for cross-model test-time compute scaling.

Core principle: Same analysis task, multiple AI perspectives, deep synthesis.

How It Works

/product-analysis full
         │
         ├─ Step 0: Auto-detect available tools (codex? competitors?)
         │
    ┌────┼──────────────┐
    │    │              │
 Claude Code         Codex CLI (auto-detected)
 Task Agents         (background Bash)
 (Explore ×3-5)      (×2-3 parallel)
    │                   │
    └────────┬──────────┘
             │
      Synthesis (main context)
             │
      Structured Report

Step 0: Auto-Detect Available Tools

Before launching any agents, detect what tools are available:

bash
# Check if Codex CLI is installed
which codex 2>/dev/null && codex --version

Decision logic:

  • If codex is found: Inform the user — "Codex CLI detected (version X). Will run cross-model analysis for richer perspectives."
  • If codex is not found: Silently proceed with Claude Code agents only. Do NOT ask the user to install anything.

Also detect the project type to tailor agent prompts:

bash
# Detect project type
ls package.json 2>/dev/null    # Node.js/React
ls pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null  # Python
ls Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null      # Rust
ls go.mod 2>/dev/null          # Go

Scope Modes

Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine analysis scope:

ScopeWhat it coversTypical agents
fullUX + API + Architecture + Docs (default)5 Claude + Codex (if available)
uxFrontend navigation, information density, user journey, empty state, onboarding3 Claude + Codex (if available)
apiBackend API coverage, endpoint health, error handling, consistency2 Claude + Codex (if available)
archModule structure, dependency graph, code duplication, separation of concerns2 Claude + Codex (if available)
compare X YSelf-audit + competitive benchmarking (invokes /competitors-analysis)3 Claude + competitors-analysis

Phase 1: Parallel Exploration

Launch all exploration agents simultaneously using Task tool (background mode).

Claude Code Agents (always)

For each dimension, spawn a Task agent with subagent_type: Explore and run_in_background: true:

Agent A — Frontend Navigation & Information Density

Explore the frontend navigation structure and entry points:
1. App.tsx: How many top-level components are mounted simultaneously?
2. Left sidebar: How many buttons/entries? What does each link to?
3. Right sidebar: How many tabs? How many sections per tab?
4. Floating panels: How many drawers/modals? Which overlap in functionality?
5. Count total first-screen interactive elements for a new user.
6. Identify duplicate entry points (same feature accessible from 2+ places).
Give specific file paths, line numbers, and element counts.

Agent B — User Journey & Empty State

Explore the new user experience:
1. Empty state page: What does a user with no sessions see? Count clickable elements.
2. Onboarding flow: How many steps? What information is presented?
3. Prompt input area: How many buttons/controls surround the input box? Which are high-frequency vs low-frequency?
4. Mobile adaptation: How many nav items? How does it differ from desktop?
5. Estimate: Can a new user complete their first conversation in 3 minutes?
Give specific file paths, line numbers, and UX assessment.

Agent C — Backend API & Health

Explore the backend API surface:
1. List ALL API endpoints (method + path + purpose).
2. Identify endpoints that are unused or have no frontend consumer.
3. Check error handling consistency (do all endpoints return structured errors?).
4. Check authentication/authorization patterns (which endpoints require auth?).
5. Identify any endpoints that duplicate functionality.
Give specific file paths and line numbers.

Agent D — Architecture & Module Structure (full/arch scope only)

Explore the module structure and dependencies:
1. Map the module dependency graph (which modules import which).
2. Identify circular dependencies or tight coupling.
3. Find code duplication across modules (same pattern in 3+ places).
4. Check separation of concerns (does each module have a single responsibility?).
5. Identify dead code or unused exports.
Give specific file paths and line numbers.

Agent E — Documentation & Config Consistency (full scope only)

Explore documentation and configuration:
1. Compare README claims vs actual implemented features.
2. Check config file consistency (base.yaml vs .env.example vs code defaults).
3. Find outdated documentation (references to removed features/files).
4. Check test coverage gaps (which modules have no tests?).
Give specific file paths and line numbers.

Codex CLI Agents (auto-detected)

If Codex CLI was detected in Step 0, launch parallel Codex analyses via background Bash.

Each Codex invocation gets the same dimensional prompt but from a different model's perspective:

bash
codex -m o4-mini \
  -c model_reasoning_effort="high" \
  --full-auto \
  "Analyze the frontend navigation structure of this project. Count all interactive elements visible to a new user on first screen. Identify duplicate entry points where the same feature is accessible from 2+ places. Give specific file paths and counts."

Run 2-3 Codex commands in parallel (background Bash), one per major dimension.

Important: Codex runs in the project's working directory. It has full filesystem access. The --full-auto flag (or --dangerously-bypass-approvals-and-sandbox for older versions) enables autonomous execution.

Phase 2: Competitive Benchmarking (compare scope only)

When scope is compare, invoke the competitors-analysis skill for each competitor:

Use the Skill tool to invoke: /competitors-analysis {competitor-name} {competitor-url}

This delegates to the orthogonal competitors-analysis skill which handles:

  • Repository cloning and validation
  • Evidence-based code analysis (file:line citations)
  • Competitor profile generation

Phase 3: Synthesis

After all agents complete, synthesize findings in the main conversation context.

Cross-Validation

Compare findings across agents (Claude vs Claude, Claude vs Codex):

  • Agreement = high confidence finding
  • Disagreement = investigate deeper (one agent may have missed context)
  • Codex-only finding = different model perspective, validate manually

Quantification

Extract hard numbers from agent reports:

MetricWhat to measure
First-screen interactive elementsTotal count of buttons/links/inputs visible to new user
Feature entry point duplicationNumber of features with 2+ entry points
API endpoints without frontend consumerCount of unused backend routes
Onboarding steps to first valueSteps from launch to first successful action
Module coupling scoreNumber of circular or bi-directional dependencies

Structured Output

Produce a layered optimization report:

markdown
## Product Analysis Report

### Executive Summary
[1-2 sentences: key finding]

### Quantified Findings
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|--------|-------|------------|
| ... | ... | ... |

### P0: Critical (block launch)
[Issues that prevent basic usability]

### P1: High Priority (launch week)
[Issues that significantly degrade experience]

### P2: Medium Priority (next sprint)
[Issues worth addressing but not blocking]

### Cross-Model Insights
[Findings that only one model identified — worth investigating]

### Competitive Position (if compare scope)
[How we compare on key dimensions]

Workflow Checklist

  • [ ] Parse $ARGUMENTS for scope
  • [ ] Auto-detect Codex CLI availability (which codex)
  • [ ] Auto-detect project type (package.json / pyproject.toml / etc.)
  • [ ] Launch Claude Code Explore agents (3-5 parallel, background)
  • [ ] Launch Codex CLI commands (2-3 parallel, background) if detected
  • [ ] Invoke /competitors-analysis if compare scope
  • [ ] Collect all agent results
  • [ ] Cross-validate findings
  • [ ] Quantify metrics
  • [ ] Generate structured report with P0/P1/P2 priorities

References

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
daymade
コミュニティ

fact-checker

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1442
更新日
10月4日
daymade
コミュニティ

excel-automation

Create, parse, and control Excel files on macOS. Professional formatting with openpyxl, complex xlsm parsing with stdlib zipfile+xml for investment bank financial models, and Excel window control via AppleScript. Use when creating formatted Excel reports, parsing financial models that openpyxl cannot handle, or automating Excel on macOS.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1433
更新日
9月28日
daymade
コミュニティ

transcript-fixer

- Corrects ASR/STT transcription errors — homophones, garbled terms, person-name errors, mixed Chinese/English — with dictionary rules plus Claude's built-in AI, no external API key required. Use to clean meeting notes, lecture transcripts, interviews or speech-recognition text, even when the user only says "fix this transcript". Not for structuring a clean transcript into minutes (use meeting-minutes-taker).

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1430
更新日
9月27日
daymade
コミュニティ

i18n-expert

This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the i18n framework, replacing hard-coded strings, ensuring en-US/zh-CN coverage, mapping error codes to localized messages, and validating key parity, pluralization, and formatting.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
1416
更新日
9月22日