使い方
- インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
- 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
- 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/dikamilo/dx-workflow --skill dx-review-triage開始前の確認
- 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
- スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。
dx-review-triage
Turn a review report's findings into decisions — and, when you say so, into edits. Every review (dx-review) only analyzes and reports; this is the one place that acts on a finding, one finding at a time, only on your confirmation.
Guard. Resolve <container-id> under context/changes/ or context/efforts/. If it resolves under context/archive/ instead, refuse: archived work is done. If reviews/ is missing or holds no report, point at /dx-review <policy-id> <container-id>.
1 — Resolve which report
A report lives at reviews/<policy-id>.md, one per Policy, always the current review because a re-run overwrites it.
- A policy ID given →
reviews/<policy-id>.md. If the file is missing, name it and list the reports that exist. - No policy ID → exactly one report → use it; several → ask which, since each can carry open findings at once.
A legacy reviews/impl-review.md or reviews/plan-review.md is never read and doesn't count as a report: if one is all there is, say it's superseded and point at /dx-review implementation <container-id> or /dx-review plan <container-id> respectively.
Load first
The report's schema — the finding/Resolution format, the resume rule, the never-commit rule — is context/config/templates/review-report.md (missing → /dx-init).
2 — Walk findings in order
Resume at the first finding with Resolution: PENDING, document order. Load what that finding's Location names — a plan section → plan.md; a file:line → that file plus enough surrounding code or git log to judge the fix — and nothing for findings you skip. Show its title, location, detail, and suggested fix, then ask:
- Fix now — apply the suggested fix (or a variant you propose); show the before/after edit first, apply on confirmation.
- Fix differently — ask what they'd prefer instead, apply that.
- Skip — leave it for now, move on.
- Accept risk — leave it, record the one-line reason.
- Record as lesson — hand the finding's title and detail to
/dx-lesson's entry shape and tell the user to confirm there. Never append tofoundation/lessons.mdyourself — that file has exactly one writer.
Immediately rewrite that finding's Resolution: line in place per the schema. If an edit you already applied for an earlier finding also resolves a later one, mark the later finding FIXED too, pointing at the same edit — don't manufacture a redundant second edit or commit.
3 — Commit what the fix touched, never the report
Decide per applied fix, from the files it changed:
- Touched files outside `context/` (shipped code, docs, config) → commit that fix on its own, the Conventional Commit shape
dx-implementuses:fix(<container-id>): <finding title> (review). Stage only those files. - Touched only `context/` artifacts (
plan.md,frame.md, …) → don't commit. Those are working state the user commits on their own schedule. - The report itself is never committed.
On disagreement
If applying a fix would contradict something the plan or a standard states elsewhere, stop and say so — don't silently pick a side.
Done when
Every finding in the resolved report has a Resolution: other than PENDING — or you've stopped partway, which is fine, since re-running resumes from the next pending one. Print a one-line tally and stop, no auto-chain:
Triaged <report file>: <n> fixed, <n> skipped, <n> accepted, <n> dismissed
Next: /dx-review <policy-id> <container-id> — re-review after fixes
or: <each line of the Policy's ## Next>



