getnao/nao

create-context-tests

Generate a test suite of natural-language → SQL pairs that becomes the quality benchmark for a nao agent, then run it via nao test.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/getnao/nao --skill create-context-tests

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

create-context-tests

nao test runs each natural-language prompt through the agent, executes both the agent's SQL and the test's expected SQL against the warehouse, and diffs the result data row-by-row. A test passes only if the actual data matches — same rows, same values. The suite is the reliability benchmark; every change to RULES.md is measured against it. Reference: docs.getnao.io/nao-agent/context-engineering/evaluation.

How many tests

One test per key metric in `## Key Metrics Reference` is the floor. Then add tests for: time scoping (especially "last 8 weeks" / "last 30 days"), CTE / multi-step queries, edge cases (NULLs, empty windows), and ambiguous wording ("our users", "active") to validate naming-convention rules.

Two authoring rules — apply to every test

Rule 1 — Prompts read like real chat. Vague, short, no table/column/method hints. The test verifies the agent reaches the right answer from a real-user input.

BadGood
"What was the churn rate from fct_subscriptions in Q1?""How's churn looking this quarter?"
"Compute MRR as SUM(mrr_amount) where status='active'""What's our MRR?"

Rule 2 — Output column names encode format / unit, not source. A column name communicates how to interpret the value.

BadGood
churn_rate_from_fct_subscriptionschurn_rate_float_0_1
mrr_amount_fct_stripe_mrrmrr_usd_dollars
signup_at_dim_userssignup_date_yyyy_mm_dd

Naming patterns: <metric>_float_0_1 or <metric>_percentage_0_100 for rates; <metric>_<currency>_<unit> for money; <thing>_count; <thing>_date_yyyy_mm_dd. See templates/test.yaml.

Steps

  1. Ask once: does the user have trusted source-of-truth queries (Looker, dashboards, prior benchmarks)? If yes, transform each into a test (rewrite SELECT to apply Rule 2; reverse-engineer a Rule 1 prompt). For metrics without a trusted query, draft new tests one per metric.
  1. Save flat under `tests/` (no subfolders), one YAML file per test. Use templates/test.yaml.
  1. Have the user validate — confirm prompts match their team's phrasing and SQL matches their definition of truth.
  1. Run `nao test`. Prerequisites:
  • cd into the project directory (where nao_config.yaml lives).
  • Start nao chat & in the background (the test runner reuses the chat server).
  • LLM configured in nao_config.yaml.
  • First run prompts for login credentials — let the user type them; don't script around it.
  • If you see AI_APICallError: Not Found at https://api.anthropic.com/messages (no /v1/), run unset ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL ANTHROPIC_API_KEY first (parent agent CLI is leaking env vars). See setup-context for the full note.
bash
    nao test -m <model_id> -t 10   # -t = parallelism
  1. Recap results: pass rate, token cost, wall-clock time. Cite this as the baseline.
  1. Diagnose failures (optional): read tests/outputs/ for each failure, identify the rule gap, propose the smallest fix, then route to write-context-rules (or audit-context for systemic issues). Re-run between fixes so impact is attributable.

Guardrails

  • Tests' SQL must execute as-is — no <placeholder> in FROM. Use real table / column names.
  • Never leak the answer in prompt or output column names (Rules 1 + 2).
  • One test per metric is the floor; coverage tests come after.
  • Apply one context fix at a time between runs.
  • If a test contradicts RULES.md, stop and ask which is correct — it's a bug in one or the other.

Templates

  • templates/test.yaml — single-test format.

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
getnao
コミュニティ

add-semantic-layer

Wire a semantic layer into a nao agent so that metric queries are routed through a single source of truth. Supports dbt MetricFlow (dbt Cloud with Semantic Layer), Snowflake (views or semantic views via MCP), an in-house nao YAML semantic layer, or other tools (via MCP discovery). Installs the right MCP server, updates RULES.md to route metric queries through the semantic layer, and (for the nao YAML option) generates starter metric files. Use after a first round of tests has shown the agent str

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
1947
更新日
10月20日
getnao
コミュニティ

audit-context

Diagnose the health of a nao context at any stage of its lifecycle. Use when the user wants a structured review of what's been synced, how RULES.md compares to the target structure, whether every table is documented, whether the data model is MECE, whether tests exist and what their failures reveal, and whether context files are bloated. Outputs a structured audit report with ranked recommendations. Do not use for first-time setup (setup-context) or routine rule writing (write-context-rules).

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
1947
更新日
10月20日
getnao
コミュニティ

build-custom-charts

Create or update browser-rendered custom nao chart modules in agent/charts.

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
1947
更新日
10月20日
getnao
コミュニティ

deploy-context

Wire a nao project's context folder to a remote nao instance (Cloud or self-hosted) so every push to main automatically runs nao deploy via GitHub Actions. Use when the user has a working local nao project versioned in Git and wants their team's deployed instance to always reflect the latest committed context. Covers nao deploy usage, the GitHub Actions workflow, organization API keys, GitHub Secrets, .naoignore, environment-variable references in naoconfig.yaml, and create-vs-update behavior. D

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
1947
更新日
10月20日