npx skills add https://github.com/heyimcarlos/agent-skills --skill grill-me見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。
Call the Skill tool with "grilling".
melvynxInterview the user in batches of 10 questions with recommended answers to sharpen a plan, an idea or an app before building. Use when the user says grill me, wants a rigorous interview, or when create-software, create-internal-app or create-landing needs a confirmed brief.
関連する理由: 計画と学習
共通のキーワード: grill · interview · sharpen
arrayawongsaitaStandalone composite skill that carries one idea from a relentless discovery interview through domain modeling, specification, a bounded design-review gate, and vertical ticket breakdown, then stops at published tickets without implementing.
関連する理由: 計画と学習
共通のキーワード: grill · relentless · interview
mister-gnommerA relentless interview (grilling) that offers lettered-choice bulk replies and keeps a running decision ledger. Use when you want a grilling session whose decisions are recorded.
関連する理由: 計画と学習
共通のキーワード: grill · relentless · interview
alirezarezvaniInterview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
関連する理由: 計画と学習
共通のキーワード: grill · interview · design
heyimcarlosSketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.
heyimcarlosSpawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.
heyimcarlosFind what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.
heyimcarlosReview the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".