mariusflorescu/pstack-t3

principle-model-the-domain

Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files.

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/mariusflorescu/pstack-t3 --skill principle-model-the-domain

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Model the Domain

Encode the real domain in a data structure instead of scattering it across conditionals. A structure that matches the domain makes invalid states unrepresentable and deletes branches. Choosing it at write time is cheap. Recovering it later reads as a refactor and gets deferred.

Reach for:

  • A state machine instead of scattered booleans, phases, or lifecycle checks.
  • A typed model instead of loose parameters or repeated shape assumptions.
  • A map, registry, lookup table, or discriminated union instead of branching spread across files.
  • A reducer or command/event model instead of ad hoc state mutations.
  • A module organized around one body of domain knowledge instead of a sequence such as load, validate, transform, and save. Execution order is not ownership.
  • A small module boundary that gathers repeated behavior, ownership, or invariants.
  • A queue, cache, index, graph, tree, or normalized collection where the access pattern calls for it.
  • Any other structure that fits. When none fits, work out what the code must never allow and how the data gets read, then find the structure that encodes exactly that.

Do not force an abstraction. Prefer boring code if the current shape is already clear, local, and unlikely to grow. Be skeptical of an abstraction that adds indirection without removing branches, duplicated rules, invalid states, or lifecycle risk.

The sign that you skipped this is a new feature that grows an existing if/else chain by one more branch, or a second boolean that must stay in sync with the first. Temporal decomposition is another sign. Phase-named modules repeat the same domain rules across steps.

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
mariusflorescu
コミュニティ

benchmark-checklist

Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it. Use when you run a benchmark or report a speedup or regression you measured.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
13
更新日
10月20日
mariusflorescu
コミュニティ

blast-radius

Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
13
更新日
10月20日
mariusflorescu
コミュニティ

correct

Find the mistakes agents keep repeating in this repo and make each one impossible. Try architecture first, then types, then a lint whose error names the fix, then a test, and write docs last. Prove each check fails on a real past mistake. Repeat this each time the operator corrects you. Use for /correct.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
13
更新日
10月20日
mariusflorescu
コミュニティ

maintain-formal-verification-skill

Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
13
更新日
10月20日