使い方
- インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
- 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
- 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/posthog/ai-plugin --skill exploring-mcp-tool-usage開始前の確認
- 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
- スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。
Exploring MCP tool usage
Any MCP server instrumented with the @posthog/mcp SDK emits a $mcp_tool_call event every time an agent invokes a tool. This skill is the front door for a user who knows they want to look at their MCP tool usage but hasn't picked a specific question. Offer the menu below, then route to the tool — or the focused skill — that answers what they choose.
Every per-tool tool here is gated behind the mcp-analytics flag, takes a toolName (the effective tool name — resolved server-side, so pass the name the agent actually invokes — except `posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures`, which matches $exception events and so takes the raw registered $mcp_tool_name) plus a dateRange, and runs the same query runner the tool-detail UI uses. So results match the UI, and you never hand-write the HogQL.
Suggested questions
Lead with these when the user is unsure what to ask:
| Ask the user… | Answered by |
|---|---|
| "Which tools fail most, or are slowest?" | exploring-mcp-tool-quality (ranks all tools), then posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats to drill in |
| "How is tool X doing overall?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats — calls, errors, p50/p95, users, sessions, intents |
| "How has tool X trended?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats — day-by-day series |
| "Why is tool X failing?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures — top error messages, by harness (raw tool name) |
| "Who uses tool X the most?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users — top callers (incl. person email/name) |
| "What gets called right before/after tool X?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors (neighborDirection: before/after) |
| "What are agents trying to do with tool X?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-sample-intents — recent agent intents |
| "What description is tool X registered with?" | posthog:query-mcp-tool-descriptions — distinct descriptions seen |
| "Which harnesses use my MCP, how reliably?" | posthog:query-mcp-harness-breakdown — calls/errors/sessions per client |
| "What are agents trying to do, across all tools?" | exploring-mcp-intent-clusters — semantic goal clusters |
| "Who is connecting, and how active are they?" | posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-list — one row per session, with client and person |
| "What did this one session do?" | exploring-mcp-sessions — a single agent run's tool sequence |
Finding the tool name
The per-tool tools need a toolName. If the user named a tool, pass it. If they asked a broad "which tool…" question, start with exploring-mcp-tool-quality to rank the tools, pick the one that stands out, then drill in with the per-tool tools above. The name to pass is the effective tool name (the inner tool for single-exec wrapper calls) — the same string the tool-quality ranking returns. The one exception is posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures, which matches $exception events by the raw registered $mcp_tool_name, not the effective inner tool.
How to use a per-tool tool
Call it with the tool name and a window, e.g. for the headline numbers of a tool:
posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats { "toolName": "<tool>", "dateRange": { "date_from": "-7d" } }Then offer a natural follow-up from the menu — e.g. after posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats shows a high error rate, reach for posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures; after it shows broad reach, reach for posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users or posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors.
When to drop to SQL
Covered by a typed tool — don't hand-write SQL for these:
| Question | Tool |
|---|---|
| One tool's headline numbers | posthog:query-mcp-tool-stats |
| One tool's day-by-day trend | posthog:query-mcp-tool-daily-stats |
| One tool's top errors | posthog:query-mcp-tool-failures |
| One tool's top callers | posthog:query-mcp-tool-top-users |
| Tools called before/after one tool | posthog:query-mcp-tool-neighbors |
| One tool's recent agent intents | posthog:query-mcp-tool-sample-intents |
| One tool's registered descriptions | posthog:query-mcp-tool-descriptions |
| Usage split by client harness | posthog:query-mcp-harness-breakdown |
| List sessions | posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-list |
| One session's tool calls | posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-tool-calls |
Not covered — use `posthog:execute-sql`:
- Cross-tool rankings (the tool-quality matrix — "which tool errors most?")
- Errored-session filtering (the session list has no error filter or error count)
- Effective tool names inside a session (
posthog:mcp-analytics-sessions-tool-calls
returns the raw $mcp_tool_name, not the inner tool of a wrapper call)
- Any custom breakdown
posthog:execute-sql is also the fallback when the mcp-analytics flag is off — every tool in the table above is gated behind it, execute-sql is not. Query $mcp_tool_call directly; the schema and recipes are in `models-mcp.md`.
Related skills
- `exploring-mcp-tool-quality` — rank
tools by error rate / latency / reach, then drill in
- `exploring-mcp-sessions` — a single agent
run and its tool sequence
agent goals grouped by semantic similarity
