tech-leads-club/agent-skills

modular-decomposition

Runs a sequenced monolith-to-modular pipeline that sizes and inventories components, finds shared domain duplication, addresses flattening and hierarchy issues, analyzes coupling, then groups components into candidate domain-aligned units, with optional emb…

ソースを見る

使い方

  1. インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
  2. 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
  3. 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill modular-decomposition

開始前の確認

  • 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
  • スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Modular Decomposition

This skill runs the Patterns 1–5 analysis pipeline before service extraction. Each pattern is plain markdown under references/; load the file for that step and execute it against the user’s codebase.

How to Use

Quick start (what users can say)

  • Full pipeline: “Run modular decomposition Patterns 1 through 5 on this repo,” “Analyze this monolith for splitting—inventory, coupling, and domain grouping.”
  • Single early step: “Identify and size components here,” “Find duplicated domain logic across modules,” “Analyze coupling between our packages.”
  • With DDD lens: “Group components into domains and check bounded contexts,” “Use DDD strategic design on this codebase before we group services.”

If the user only wants extraction order, phases, or migration roadmap after analysis exists, use decomposition-planning-roadmap instead. If they need a full legacy migration plan (strangler fig, research, multi-stack), use legacy-migration-planner as well or instead of this skill when that is the primary ask.

How the agent should run it

  1. Scope: Confirm the task is structural analysis (inventory → coupling → grouping), not roadmap authoring. If unclear, ask once whether they want the full ordered pipeline or a subset.
  2. Order: Run patterns 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 in that order. Do not skip a step unless the user explicitly limits scope; if they do, state which patterns were skipped and how that limits later conclusions.
  3. Load references: For each pattern, open the matching references/pattern-NN-*.md file and follow its instructions. Use the optional *-quick-reference.md for the same number when a short checklist is enough.
  4. Carry context forward: Reuse outputs from earlier patterns in later ones (e.g. component inventory from Pattern 1 informs coupling in 4 and grouping in 5). Reference concrete paths, modules, or tables from previous steps.
  5. Domain language (Pattern 5): If subdomains or bounded contexts need grounding beyond structure, read references/domain-analysis.md before or alongside Pattern 5. Optionally open references/domain-analysis-quick-reference.md or references/domain-analysis-examples.md for condensed rules or illustrations.
  6. Deliver: Produce clear, actionable findings per pattern or one consolidated report—always tied to evidence from the repository (files, dependencies, metrics), not generic advice.

Usage examples

Example 1 — Full pipeline

User: "We're going to split this monolith—run the full decomposition analysis (Patterns 1–5)."

Agent: Execute patterns 1→5 in order, loading each references/pattern-NN-*.md, preserving outputs between steps, then summarize cross-cutting recommendations.

Example 2 — Coupling after inventory

User: "We already have a rough module list—focus on coupling (Pattern 4) and then domain grouping (Pattern 5)."

Agent: If no prior inventory exists in the thread, either run Pattern 1 briefly or derive an explicit module list from the repo before 4 and 5. State any assumptions.

Example 3 — DDD before grouping

User: "Map bounded contexts and language, then group components into domains."

Agent: Read references/domain-analysis.md (and optional quick reference/examples) in parallel with or immediately before Pattern 5; align Pattern 5 groupings with linguistic boundaries where evidence supports it.

Prerequisites

  • Complete Pattern N before starting Pattern N+1 unless the user explicitly narrows scope. Later patterns depend on earlier results (for example, inventory and structure inform coupling and grouping).
  • If business vocabulary, subdomains, or bounded contexts are uncertain, use references/domain-analysis.md before or alongside Pattern 5 (see Bounded contexts below).

Ordered workflow (Patterns 1–5)

StepPatternPrimary reference
1Identify and size componentsreferences/pattern-01-identify-and-size.md (optional: pattern-01-identify-and-size-quick-reference.md)
2Common domain detectionreferences/pattern-02-common-domain.md (optional: pattern-02-common-domain-quick-reference.md)
3Flattening / hierarchyreferences/pattern-03-flattening.md (optional: pattern-03-flattening-quick-reference.md)
4Coupling analysisreferences/pattern-04-coupling.md
5Domain identification and groupingreferences/pattern-05-domain-grouping.md (optional: pattern-05-domain-grouping-quick-reference.md)

Pattern 6 — planning and extraction

Pattern 6 (create domain services / extraction) is not duplicated here. After Pattern 5, switch to decomposition-planning-roadmap for phased extraction order, milestones, and migration-style planning. For full legacy migration strategy (strangler-fig, cross-stack rewrites, research-heavy plans), optionally use legacy-migration-planner in addition.

Bounded contexts and DDD strategic design

  • Patterns 1–4 focus on structural inventory, duplication, hierarchy, and coupling between parts of the codebase.
  • Pattern 5 produces candidate groupings aligned with solution-space boundaries (which components belong together as services).
  • Strategic DDD (subdomains, bounded contexts, ubiquitous language) is covered in references/domain-analysis.md, with optional domain-analysis-quick-reference.md and domain-analysis-examples.md. Use it when you need to validate or refine boundaries against business language, not only folder structure.

タスクに関連する項目

同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
tech-leads-club
コミュニティ

perf-astro

Astro-specific performance optimizations for 95+ Lighthouse scores. Covers critical CSS inlining, compression, font loading, and LCP optimization. Use when optimizing Astro site performance, improving Astro Lighthouse scores, or configuring astro-critters. Do NOT use for non-Astro sites (use perf-web-optimization or core-web-vitals) or running Lighthouse audits (use perf-lighthouse).

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
7091
更新日
10月24日
tech-leads-club
コミュニティ

tlc-spec-driven

Feature planning and implementation with 4 adaptive phases (Specify, Design, Tasks, Execute). Auto-sizes depth by complexity. Writes testable requirements in EARS notation, atomic tasks, atomic Conventional Commits, and requirement traceability. Ships deterministic Python validation scripts so structural gates are enforced by code, not memory. Features an independent Verifier (author != verifier, evidence-or-zero), a discrimination sensor, a decision log (STATE.md), a test-coverage matrix, and a

導入数
2
GitHub Stars
7082
更新日
10月22日
tech-leads-club
コミュニティ

chrome-devtools

Browser debugging, performance profiling, and automation via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when user says "debug this page", "take a screenshot", "check network requests", "profile performance", "inspect console errors", or "analyze page load". Do NOT use for full E2E test suites (use playwright-skill) or non-browser debugging.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
7043
更新日
10月8日
tech-leads-club
コミュニティ

coding-guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, modifying, or reviewing code — implementation tasks, code changes, refactoring, bug fixes, or feature development. Do NOT use for architecture design, documentation, or non-code tasks.

導入数
1
GitHub Stars
7043
更新日
10月8日