wshobson/agents

multi-cloud-architecture

Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to select and integrate services across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI.

ソースを見る
リポジトリの原文

見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。

Multi-Cloud Architecture

Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI.

Purpose

Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers.

When to Use

  • Design multi-cloud strategies
  • Migrate between cloud providers
  • Select cloud services for specific workloads
  • Implement cloud-agnostic architectures
  • Optimize costs across providers

Cloud Service Comparison

Compute Services

AWSAzureGCPOCIUse Case
EC2Virtual MachinesCompute EngineComputeIaaS VMs
ECSContainer InstancesCloud RunContainer InstancesContainers
EKSAKSGKEOKEKubernetes
LambdaFunctionsCloud FunctionsFunctionsServerless
FargateContainer AppsCloud RunContainer InstancesManaged containers

Storage Services

AWSAzureGCPOCIUse Case
S3Blob StorageCloud StorageObject StorageObject storage
EBSManaged DisksPersistent DiskBlock VolumesBlock storage
EFSAzure FilesFilestoreFile StorageFile storage
GlacierArchive StorageArchive StorageArchive StorageCold storage

Database Services

AWSAzureGCPOCIUse Case
RDSSQL DatabaseCloud SQLMySQL HeatWaveManaged SQL
DynamoDBCosmos DBFirestoreNoSQL DatabaseNoSQL
AuroraPostgreSQL/MySQLCloud SpannerAutonomous DatabaseDistributed SQL
ElastiCacheCache for RedisMemorystoreOCI CacheCaching

Reference: See references/service-comparison.md for complete comparison

Multi-Cloud Patterns

Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR

  • Primary workload in one cloud
  • Disaster recovery in another
  • Database replication across clouds
  • Automated failover

Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed

  • Use best service from each provider
  • AI/ML on GCP
  • Enterprise apps on Azure
  • Regulated data platforms on OCI
  • General compute on AWS

Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution

  • Serve users from nearest cloud region
  • Data sovereignty compliance
  • Global load balancing
  • Regional failover

Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction

  • Kubernetes for compute
  • PostgreSQL for database
  • S3-compatible storage (MinIO)
  • Open source tools

Cloud-Agnostic Architecture

Use Cloud-Native Alternatives

  • Compute: Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE/OKE)
  • Database: PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL/MySQL HeatWave)
  • Message Queue: Apache Kafka or managed streaming (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent/OCI Streaming)
  • Cache: Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore/OCI Cache)
  • Object Storage: S3-compatible API
  • Monitoring: Prometheus/Grafana
  • Service Mesh: Istio/Linkerd

Abstraction Layers

Application Layer
    ↓
Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform)
    ↓
Cloud Provider APIs
    ↓
AWS / Azure / GCP / OCI

Cost Comparison

Compute Pricing Factors

  • AWS: On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans
  • Azure: Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot
  • GCP: On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible
  • OCI: Pay-as-you-go, annual commitments, burstable/flexible shapes, preemptible instances

Cost Optimization Strategies

  1. Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings)
  2. Leverage spot/preemptible instances
  3. Right-size resources
  4. Use serverless for variable workloads
  5. Optimize data transfer costs
  6. Implement lifecycle policies
  7. Use cost allocation tags
  8. Monitor with cloud cost tools

Reference: See references/multi-cloud-patterns.md

Migration Strategy

Phase 1: Assessment

  • Inventory current infrastructure
  • Identify dependencies
  • Assess cloud compatibility
  • Estimate costs

Phase 2: Pilot

  • Select pilot workload
  • Implement in target cloud
  • Test thoroughly
  • Document learnings

Phase 3: Migration

  • Migrate workloads incrementally
  • Maintain dual-run period
  • Monitor performance
  • Validate functionality

Phase 4: Optimization

  • Right-size resources
  • Implement cloud-native services
  • Optimize costs
  • Enhance security

Best Practices

  1. Use infrastructure as code (Terraform/OpenTofu)
  2. Implement CI/CD pipelines for deployments
  3. Design for failure across clouds
  4. Use managed services when possible
  5. Implement comprehensive monitoring
  6. Automate cost optimization
  7. Follow security best practices
  8. Document cloud-specific configurations
  9. Test disaster recovery procedures
  10. Train teams on multiple clouds

Related Skills

  • terraform-module-library - For IaC implementation
  • cost-optimization - For cost management
  • hybrid-cloud-networking - For connectivity
同じリポジトリから

関連する Skills

すべての Skills
wshobson
コミュニティ

typescript-advanced-types

Master TypeScript's advanced type system including generics, conditional types, mapped types, template literals, and utility types for building type-safe applications. Use when implementing complex type logic, creating reusable type utilities, or ensuring compile-time type safety in TypeScript projects.

導入数
7.2万
GitHub Stars
3.9万
更新日
9月7日
wshobson
コミュニティ

tailwind-design-system

Build scalable design systems with Tailwind CSS v4, design tokens, component libraries, and responsive patterns. Use when creating component libraries, implementing design systems, or standardizing UI patterns.

導入数
6.3万
GitHub Stars
3.9万
更新日
9月7日
wshobson
コミュニティ

nodejs-backend-patterns

Build production-ready Node.js backend services with Express/Fastify, implementing middleware patterns, error handling, authentication, database integration, and API design best practices. Use when creating Node.js servers, REST APIs, GraphQL backends, or microservices architectures.

導入数
4.5万
GitHub Stars
3.9万
更新日
9月7日
wshobson
コミュニティ

kpi-dashboard-design

Design effective KPI dashboards with metrics selection, visualization best practices, and real-time monitoring patterns. Use this skill when building an executive SaaS metrics dashboard tracking MRR, churn, and LTV/CAC ratios; designing an operations center with live service health and request throughput; creating a cohort retention analysis view for a product team; or debugging a dashboard where metrics contradict each other due to inconsistent calculation methodology.

導入数
4
GitHub Stars
3.9万
更新日
9月7日