使い方
- インストールコマンドをコピーし、自分の環境へ導入する前にソースを確認します。
- 必要なツール、認証情報、対応環境を原文で確認します。
- 入力と成果物を指定し、出力を資料と照合します。
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill review-agent-setup開始前の確認
- 導入にはモデル契約、API枠、ファイルへのアクセス許可は含まれません。
- スター数や導入数は活動の指標であり、独立した品質・安全性試験ではありません。
見出し、例、コード、表、リンク、参照画像を含む原文を表示しています。
review-agent-governance — Setup
Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt.
When to use this plugin
Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent:
- Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (
gh pr review,gh pr merge) - Triages issues (
gh issue comment,gh issue close) - Publishes releases (
gh release create) - Modifies CI configuration (
.github/workflows/,.gitlab-ci.yml) - Pushes to protected branches (
main,master,release,production) - Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord), once you
add a rule for the command that posts (the default policy does not gate them)
If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use protect-mcp for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one.
One-time setup
1. Install the plugin
claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance2. Copy the default policy to your project
cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \
./review-governance.cedarYou can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See ../agents/review-policy-author.md for guidance on authoring review policies.
3. Create a receipts directory and sign key
mkdir -p ./review-receipts
echo "/review-receipts/" >> .gitignore
echo "/review-governance.key" >> .gitignore
echo "/.review-approved" >> .gitignore
if [ ! -e ./review-governance.key ]; then
d=$(mktemp -d) && npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 init --dir "$d" && mv "$d/keys/gateway.json" ./review-governance.key
fiprotect-mcp 0.7.4 sign does not create the key, so the last command creates it, and it never replaces an existing key. Without a key, the receipts are unsigned. To rotate the key, archive ./review-governance.key and ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl first, then run the command again. Give auditors the publicKey value from ./review-governance.key. Do not commit the file, because it also holds the private key.
Per-session workflow
The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after.
Flag file (simplest)
# Before the action you want to approve
touch ./.review-approved
# Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge
# Immediately after
rm ./.review-approvedSlash command (from within Claude Code)
/approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X"This creates ./.review-approved with the given reason embedded as a note, and records the reason in an unsigned approval log under ./review-receipts/approvals/. A follow-up rm is still needed to close the window.
Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation)
If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass:
export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approveAny tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run.
Verifying the receipts
List all receipts:
ls -la ./review-receipts/Verify every receipt offline with the public key:
PUB=$(node -p 'JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("./review-governance.key")).publicKey')
npx @veritasacta/verify@0.9.2 --replay-chain ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB"Exit 0 means every receipt verified. Exit 1 means a receipt failed verification, because it was tampered with, the key is wrong, or a line is malformed. Exit 2 means the receipts file could not be read.
A denied call never runs, so it has no receipt. To see what the policy blocked, run this inside Claude Code:
/list-pendingIt lists the tool calls that the PreToolUse hook blocked in the current session, with the tool name and the command or path.
Example: approving a PR review
# 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment
$ /list-pending
Blocked in this session:
- Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'"
- Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'"
# 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it
$ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection"
./.review-approved created
# 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds
$ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM"
[receipt appended to ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl, decision=allow]
# 4. Human closes the window
$ rm ./.review-approvedThe allowed call has a signed receipt that anyone with the public key can verify offline. The denied attempt has no receipt, and the approval log is not signed, so keep both in mind when you show the trail to an auditor.
Composing with protect-mcp
If both plugins are installed, each plugin's hooks/hooks.json registers its own PreToolUse hook, and Claude Code runs both on every tool call:
{ "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" }Each evaluate.sh reads tool_name and tool_input from the hook payload on stdin (Claude Code sets no TOOL_NAME variable) and evaluates its own policy: ./protect.cedar for protect-mcp and ./review-governance.cedar here.
Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it.
Standards
- Ed25519 — RFC 8032 (digital signatures)
- JCS — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization)
- Cedar — AWS's open authorization policy language
- IETF draft — draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts




