affaan-m/ecc

recsys-pipeline-architect

Design composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines using the six-stage Source→Hydrator→Filter→Scorer→Selector→SideEffect framework popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill recsys-pipeline-architect

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

recsys-pipeline-architect

A spec-and-scaffold skill for building composable recommendation, ranking, and feed pipelines. It encodes the six-stage pattern — Source → Hydrator → Filter → Scorer → Selector → SideEffect — popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm (Apache 2.0). This skill is an independent reimplementation of the pattern (MIT) — no code copied from the original.

Upstream: <https://github.com/mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect>

When to Use

  • User wants to build any system that picks "the top K items for a user/context"
  • User asks "how should I rank X" or describes a feed/personalization problem
  • User has a scoring function and needs the pipeline plumbing around it
  • User wants to migrate from a single relevance score to multi-action prediction with tunable weights
  • User is wrapping an LLM/ML scorer and needs filters, hydrators, side-effects, and a runnable scaffold in their stack (TypeScript / Go / Python)
  • Triggers: "recommendation system", "feed algorithm", "ranking pipeline", "for you feed", "candidate pipeline", "content recommender", "pipeline architecture for recsys", "RAG retrieval reranker"

When NOT to Use

  • Model architecture work (transformer design, two-tower retrieval, embedding training) — this skill is plumbing around the model, not the model itself
  • Pure ML training pipelines — the scoring function is the user's responsibility
  • Operating a deployed pipeline (monitoring, autoscaling) — out of scope

The six-stage framework

#StageJobParallel?
1SourceFetch candidates from one or more originsYes — multiple sources run in parallel
2HydratorEnrich each candidate with metadata needed for filtering and scoringYes — independent hydrators run in parallel
3FilterDrop candidates that should never be shown (blocked, expired, duplicate, ineligible)Sequential — each filter sees fewer items
4ScorerAssign each surviving candidate one or more scoresSequential — later scorers see earlier scores
5SelectorSort by final score, return top KSingle op
6SideEffectCache served IDs, log impressions, emit events, update countersAsync — must never block the response

Why this exact order

  • Sources before hydration: know what candidates exist before paying to enrich them
  • Hydration before filtering: many filters need metadata the source did not provide
  • Filtering before scoring: scoring is the expensive stage; drop the ineligible first
  • Scorer chain (not single scorer): real systems compose ML scoring + diversity reranking + business rules
  • Selector after scoring: keeps scoring deterministic and cacheable
  • SideEffects last and async: side effects must never block the user response

Workflow when invoked

Walk the user through these eight steps:

  1. Clarify the use case (one round, three questions): items being ranked? input context? language/runtime?
  2. Identify the candidate sources: usually in-network (followed/owned/subscribed) + out-of-network (ML retrieval / trending / similar-to-liked)
  3. List required hydrations: for each filter and scorer, what data does it need that the source did not provide?
  4. List the filters: duplicate, self, age, block/mute, previously-served, eligibility. Order matters — cheap before expensive.
  5. Design the scorer chain: primary (ML) → combiner (multi-action with weights) → diversity → business rules
  6. Selector: sort descending by final score, take top K (or stratified mix for in-network/out-of-network)
  7. SideEffects: cache served IDs, emit impression events, update counters, log analytics — all fire-and-forget
  8. Generate the scaffold in the user's stack

Key trade-offs to surface (don't default silently)

1. Single score vs multi-action prediction

  • Single score: train one model to predict relevance. To change behavior → retrain.
  • Multi-action: predict P(action) for many actions (read, like, share, skip, report), combine with weights at serving time. To change behavior → change weights. No retraining.

The X For You system uses multi-action with both positive and negative weights. Recommend multi-action when the user expects to tune frequently.

2. Candidate isolation in scoring

  • Isolated: each candidate scored independently. Deterministic, cacheable.
  • Joint: candidates attend to each other during scoring (e.g., transformer over batch). More expressive but non-deterministic across batches.

Default to isolation. Joint only when there's a specific reason (e.g., explicit batch-aware diversity).

3. Online vs offline

  • Request-time (online): pipeline runs on each request. Latency budget: 100–300ms. Default.
  • Pre-computed (offline batch): pipeline runs periodically, results cached. Lower latency, lower freshness.
  • Hybrid: candidate retrieval offline, ranking online.

Hard rules

  1. Do not invent benchmark numbers. "How much faster?" → "depends on workload, run it yourself."
  2. Attribution discipline. When the pattern is referenced, attribute as "popularized by xAI's open-sourced For You algorithm" / github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm (Apache 2.0).
  3. No trademark use. Do not name the user's artifact "X-like" or use "For You" branding. Pattern is free; brand is not. Suggested naming: "candidate pipeline", "feed pipeline", "ranking pipeline", "recsys pipeline".
  4. Surface trade-offs. Multi-action vs single, isolation vs joint, online vs offline — never default silently.
  5. The generated scaffold must run. No pseudocode passing as code.
  6. Filter order matters. Cheap before expensive. Universal before user-specific.
  7. Side effects never block. Wrap in fire-and-forget patterns (goroutines / promises without await / asyncio tasks).

Anti-Patterns

  • Scoring before filtering (wastes compute on candidates that will be dropped anyway)
  • Synchronous side effects (cache writes / impression emits blocking the response)
  • A single "relevance" score when the product needs to tune for multiple objectives (engagement vs safety vs diversity vs ads)
  • Joint scoring as default (non-deterministic, harder to cache, doesn't compose with reranking stages)
  • Generating pseudocode "for illustration" — the scaffold must actually run

Upstream contents

The upstream repository at <https://github.com/mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect> ships:

  • Full SKILL.md with the complete 8-step workflow
  • 5 load-on-demand reference docs: interfaces in 4 languages (TS/Go/Python/Rust), multi-action scoring pattern, candidate isolation, filter cookbook (12 patterns), scorer cookbook (weighted sum, MMR, diversity penalty, position debiasing)
  • 3 runnable example scaffolds, every one green on its test suite:
  • Strapi v5 plugin (TypeScript / Jest — 3/3 pass)
  • Zentra-compatible pipeline (Go with generics — 3/3 pass)
  • PMAI task prioritizer (Python / FastAPI / pytest — 3/3 pass)
  • v0.1.0 release tagged
  • MIT license; pattern attributed to xAI X For You algorithm (Apache 2.0)

Install via skills.sh: npx skills add mturac/recsys-pipeline-architect

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
affaan-m
커뮤니티

scientific-thinking-literature-review

Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging. Use when the task is to find, screen, synthesize, and cite a body of academic or technical literature.

설치 수
3
GitHub Stars
28.9만
업데이트
10월 25일
affaan-m
커뮤니티

docker-patterns

Docker and Docker Compose patterns for local development, hardened CLI installer harnesses, container security, networking, volumes, and multi-service orchestration. Use when creating or reviewing Dockerfiles and Compose services, testing installers across Linux distributions, or planning accurate native macOS and Windows validation.

설치 수
4
GitHub Stars
28.8만
업데이트
10월 20일
affaan-m
커뮤니티

agentic-engineering

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when planning or executing engineering work that agents will carry out end to end.

설치 수
3
GitHub Stars
28.8만
업데이트
10월 20일
affaan-m
커뮤니티

backend-patterns

Backend architecture patterns, API design, database optimization, and server-side best practices for Node.js, Express, and Next.js API routes. Use when building or reviewing Node.js, Express, or Next.js API routes and their data access.

설치 수
3
GitHub Stars
28.8만
업데이트
10월 20일