ai-evals-course/evals-skills

evals-start

Entry point for evals.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/ai-evals-course/evals-skills --skill evals-start

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Evals Start

This plugin splits eval work into targeted skills. Your job here is small: find the row below that matches the user's situation, tell the user which skill you are loading and why, then load that skill and follow its workflow from start to finish instead of improvising your own version of it.

SituationSkill to load
Has traces, wants to find failure modes, no established taxonomy yeterror-discovery
Has an existing eval pipeline and wants to know if it can be trustedeval-audit
Has a known failure mode that code can check (e.g., format, schema, regex, execution)write-code-eval
Has a known failure mode and wants an LLM judge for itwrite-judge-prompt
Has an LLM judge or evaluator and wants to check its qualityvalidate-evaluator
Has no traces to review yetgenerate-synthetic-data, then error-discovery
Wants a custom annotation interface for some other labeling taskbuild-review-interface
Wants to evaluate a RAG pipelineevaluate-rag

Most requests that mention error analysis with traces in hand mean error-discovery. New users with an existing pipeline usually need eval-audit first. This file holds only routing. When in doubt about which row fits, ask the user instead of guessing. The workflow lives in the targeted skill.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
ai-evals-course
커뮤니티

eval-audit

Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-discovery, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
9월 24일
ai-evals-course
커뮤니티

write-code-eval

Write code evaluators for known failure modes with objective rules. Use when code can check the rule from a trace, with or without a reference answer. Use write-judge-prompt when the rule requires interpretation.

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
9월 24일
ai-evals-course
커뮤니티

write-judge-prompt

Design LLM-as-Judge evaluators for subjective criteria that code-based checks cannot handle. Use when a failure mode requires interpretation (tone, faithfulness, relevance, completeness). Do NOT use when the failure mode can be checked with code (regex, schema validation, execution tests); use write-code-eval. To validate an existing judge, use validate-evaluator.

1시간 설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
9월 24일
ai-evals-course
커뮤니티

error-discovery

Run error analysis on a dataset. Build a review UI, select diverse samples, monitor annotations, and organize failure modes.

1시간 설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
9월 24일