albertmartorell1975/android-ai-workflow-foundation

compose-recomposition-performance

Use when investigating Jetpack Compose recomposition performance, skippable/restartable composables, composables.txt or compiler reports, Layout Inspector recomposition counts, back-writing snapshot state across phases, or frame-rate State reads in composit…

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/albertmartorell1975/android-ai-workflow-foundation --skill compose-recomposition-performance

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Compose recomposition performance

Router only — deep fixes live in focused skills below.

Three axes

  1. Parameter stability / skipping — can Compose skip this restartable composable; are arguments stable and comparable?
  2. Where `State` is read — is frame-rate State read during composition vs layout/draw?
  3. Back-writing across phases — does a later phase write snapshot state that invalidates an earlier phase? Examples: map/list mutation during composition that re-invalidates the same composition; onSizeChanged (layout phase) writing state read by a sibling in composition.

Axes 2 and 3 often overlap (a sibling reading measured size in composition is both a deferred-read violation and a layout → composition back-write). Axis 1 is independent.

Route here → focused skill

Primary suspicionNext skill
Skipping, unstable params, compiler/composables.txt churn`compose-stability-diagnostics`
Frame-rate State read phase (composition vs layout/draw)`compose-state-deferred-reads`
putAll / map rebuild / cross-row height(state) during composition`compose-state-deferred-reads` — § back-writing
Focus-driven side work in composable body`compose-side-effects` — snapshotFlow
Evidence for multiple axesApply matching skills in parallel

Review order

  1. Reproduce one transition (focus move, insertion, scroll) and note which composables recompose.
  2. If counts spike on unchanged lazy items, check back-writing (composition mutations and cross-row measurement) before blaming stability.
  3. If counts climb every frame during scroll/animation, check deferred reads.
  4. If skipping fails despite stable data, check parameter stability and compiler reports.
  5. Re-measure after each fix.

False leads

These changes often do not reduce recomposition count:

AttemptWhy it fails
remember(index) { isFirstRow(index) } instead of inline when (index)Same inputs; no skipping benefit
Identity cache for read-only derived mapsCan serve stale overlays; remember(keys) is enough
mutableIntStateOf + layout modifier on both measured and sibling rowsSibling still reads size in composition unless measure-only
Forcing Exactly(1) on both rows in focus-move testsOne row often correctly recomposes 0 times
Hoisting without stabilizing lambda capturesNew lambda instance each frame still defeats skipping

When NOT to apply

  • Recomposition tracks real data changes, or the bug is correctness not cost.
  • No profiler / compiler signal suggests a problem.

Related

관련 작업