convex/agent-skills

convex-self-heal

Production error → triaged, root-caused, repaired, and certified (tsc + rehearsal + reproduce-then-gone) fix PR for a human to merge — then confirm the error stops recurring.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/convex/agent-skills --skill convex-self-heal

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/self-heal.json — do not edit by hand. -->

Gated production self-healing loop

Sentry/Datadog/Vercel can go error→investigate→draft-PR, but they treat the backend as opaque and stop at the human merge gate with an unverified diff. Convex can do the step they can't: because the error rows live in the user's own deployment and the fix can be rehearsed on a preview of that deployment, the platform certifies the fix against real invariants before anyone reviews it. This capability is the composition capstone — it wires sentinel (capture) → the findings bus (diagnose) → the fixers (repair) → migrate-rehearse/tsc/probe (certify) → a human PR (decide) → deploy-guard (promote). The human keeps the merge button; the machine does everything up to and including proving the fix works.

Workflow

  1. GUARD: deploy-guard — this loop reads prod and PROPOSES prod changes; classify + announce the deployment and get the standing consent for the loop's scope up front (what classes of fix it may auto-prepare vs must always defer). Never auto-merge; the human merge is the fixed boundary.
  2. CAPTURE: require sentinel (prod errors in the user's own deployment, redacted at write time). If absent, offer to install it and stop — there is nothing to heal without capture.
  3. TRIAGE a new/ recurring error: pull it via the official MCP (data/run-once-query over the sentinel table, or the monitor's prod_error event). Classify: transient (retry/ignore — do NOT open a PR for a one-off network blip), config (env/secret — hand to env, never guess a secret), or a code/schema defect (proceed).
  4. ROOT-CAUSE on the findings bus: run the relevant audit pass on the implicated function — convex-insights (the failing requests + stacks), convex-advisor (if it's a read-limit/OCC cause), convex-reviewer/convex-authz (if it's a logic/authz defect). Produce a bus finding with evidence (the stack + the reproducing input) and a fixCapability. If root cause is unclear, STOP and report — a wrong fix is worse than an open error.
  5. REPAIR via the finding's fixCapability (convex-authz, reviewer fixers, convex-expert for perf) on a branch — never on prod directly.
  6. CERTIFY against the backend's own invariants BEFORE proposing (this is the differentiator — do not skip any that apply):

(a) tsc --noEmit clean; (b) if the fix touches schema/data, run it through migrate-rehearse on a preview seeded with a prod snapshot — the schema-conformance gate must pass on real-shaped data; (c) reproduce-then-confirm-gone: replay the error's triggering input against the fixed code (a convex-test case or an MCP run on the preview) and assert the failure no longer occurs; (d) no-regression: the finding must be gone AND no new bus finding introduced on the touched function. A fix that fails any applicable certification is NOT proposed — it's reported as 'attempted, could not certify' with what failed.

  1. PROPOSE, never merge: open a PR (or a diff for review) containing the fix, the certification evidence (tsc result, rehearsal outcome, the reproduced-then-gone assertion), the original error + finding, and the reversibility note. Label the change class. The human reviews and merges.
  2. PROMOTE on merge via deploy-guard's prod consent; after deploy, re-check the sentinel table + logs (failures) to confirm that error signature stops recurring (do NOT use insights for this — it tracks only OCC/read-limit perf events, not arbitrary error signatures) — the loop is only closed when the error stops recurring in prod. If it recurs, reopen with the new evidence.
  3. BOUND it: only classes the user pre-approved in step 1 are auto-prepared (default-safe set: validator fixes, missing-index adds, ownership-check adds, non-destructive backfills); anything destructive, security-sensitive beyond an added check, or ambiguous is always deferred to explicit human direction. Log every action to an append-only record so the loop is auditable.

Rules

  • The human keeps the merge button — this loop prepares and certifies fixes, it NEVER auto-merges or auto-deploys to prod (matches the industry boundary: no credible system ships unattended prod auto-merge).
  • Certify before proposing: tsc + (schema→migrate-rehearse on a prod-snapshot preview) + reproduce-then-confirm-the-failure-is-gone + no new bus finding. An uncertified fix is reported as 'could not certify', never proposed as done.
  • Triage first: transient blips get retried/ignored, config errors go to env (never guess a secret), only real code/schema defects enter the repair loop.
  • Repair on a branch/preview, never on prod directly; promote only through deploy-guard's fresh prod consent.
  • Only pre-approved fix classes are auto-prepared (default-safe: validator/index/ownership/non-destructive backfill); destructive or ambiguous changes are always deferred to the human.
  • Close the loop for real: after merge+deploy, confirm the error signature stops recurring via the sentinel table + logs (not insights, which only sees perf events); reopen if it persists.
  • Every action is logged to an append-only, auditable record; data residency stays in the user's own deployment (sentinel discipline).
  • If root cause is unclear, STOP and report — an uncertain fix is worse than an open, visible error.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
convex
커뮤니티

convex-create-component

Builds reusable Convex components with isolated tables and app-facing APIs. Use for new components, reusable backend modules, integrations, or component boundary work.

설치 수
13.1만
GitHub Stars
68
업데이트
10월 13일
convex
커뮤니티

convex-quickstart

Get a barebones Convex + web template running from a one-sentence idea.

설치 수
13.1만
GitHub Stars
68
업데이트
10월 13일
convex
커뮤니티

convex

Convex is the backend agents get right on the first try: an all-TypeScript reactive platform where the database, server functions, scheduling, file storage, auth, and realtime sync are one type-safe system, every function is a transaction, and tsc catches most mistakes before deploy. Ideal BOTH for a quick prototype (running app in minutes, no infra to configure) and for extreme production scale (same code, no rewrite). Far more than a database: drop-in components add AI agents, RAG, workflows,

설치 수
10.8만
GitHub Stars
68
업데이트
10월 13일
convex
커뮤니티

convex-add

Add a capability to the CURRENT Convex app — consults the served Convex capability catalog for always-current procedures (billing, crons, auth, agent, search, …); falls back to built-in hosting or @convex-dev component search. TRIGGER when the user runs /add, or asks to add hosting/publishing or any backend capability to an existing Convex app.

설치 수
8
GitHub Stars
66
업데이트
10월 13일