daymade/claude-code-skills

qa-expert

This skill should be used when establishing comprehensive QA testing processes for any software project.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/daymade/claude-code-skills --skill qa-expert

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

QA Expert

Establish world-class QA testing processes for any software project using proven methodologies from Google Testing Standards and OWASP security best practices.

When to Use This Skill

Trigger this skill when:

  • Setting up QA infrastructure for a new or existing project
  • Writing standardized test cases (AAA pattern compliance)
  • Executing comprehensive test plans with progress tracking
  • Implementing security testing (OWASP Top 10)
  • Filing bugs with proper severity classification (P0-P4)
  • Generating QA reports (daily summaries, weekly progress)
  • Calculating quality metrics (pass rate, coverage, gates)
  • Preparing QA documentation for third-party team handoffs
  • Enabling autonomous LLM-driven test execution

Quick Start

One-command initialization:

bash
python scripts/init_qa_project.py <project-name> [output-directory]

What gets created:

  • Directory structure (tests/docs/, tests/e2e/, tests/fixtures/)
  • Tracking CSVs (TEST-EXECUTION-TRACKING.csv, BUG-TRACKING-TEMPLATE.csv)
  • Documentation templates (BASELINE-METRICS.md, WEEKLY-PROGRESS-REPORT.md)
  • Master QA Prompt for autonomous execution
  • README with complete quickstart guide

For autonomous execution (recommended): See references/master_qa_prompt.md - single copy-paste command for 100x speedup.

Core Capabilities

1. QA Project Initialization

Initialize complete QA infrastructure with all templates:

bash
python scripts/init_qa_project.py <project-name> [output-directory]

Creates directory structure, tracking CSVs, documentation templates, and master prompt for autonomous execution.

Use when: Starting QA from scratch or migrating to structured QA process.

2. Test Case Writing

Write standardized, reproducible test cases following AAA pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert):

  1. Read template: assets/templates/TEST-CASE-TEMPLATE.md
  2. Follow structure: Prerequisites (Arrange) → Test Steps (Act) → Expected Results (Assert)
  3. Assign priority: P0 (blocker) → P4 (low)
  4. Include edge cases and potential bugs

Test case format: TC-[CATEGORY]-[NUMBER] (e.g., TC-CLI-001, TC-WEB-042, TC-SEC-007)

Reference: See references/google_testing_standards.md for complete AAA pattern guidelines and coverage thresholds.

3. Test Execution & Tracking

Ground Truth Principle (critical):

  • Test case documents (e.g., 02-CLI-TEST-CASES.md) = authoritative source for test steps
  • Tracking CSV = execution status only (do NOT trust CSV for test specifications)
  • See references/ground_truth_principle.md for preventing doc/CSV sync issues

Manual execution:

  1. Read test case from category document (e.g., 02-CLI-TEST-CASES.md) ← always start here
  2. Execute test steps exactly as documented
  3. Update TEST-EXECUTION-TRACKING.csv immediately after EACH test (never batch)
  4. File bug in BUG-TRACKING-TEMPLATE.csv if test fails

Autonomous execution (recommended):

  1. Copy master prompt from references/master_qa_prompt.md
  2. Paste to LLM session
  3. LLM auto-executes, auto-tracks, auto-files bugs, auto-generates reports

Innovation: 100x faster vs manual + zero human error in tracking + auto-resume capability.

4. Bug Reporting

File bugs with proper severity classification:

Required fields:

  • Bug ID: Sequential (BUG-001, BUG-002, ...)
  • Severity: P0 (24h fix) → P4 (optional)
  • Steps to Reproduce: Numbered, specific
  • Environment: OS, versions, configuration

Severity classification:

  • P0 (Blocker): Security vulnerability, core functionality broken, data loss
  • P1 (Critical): Major feature broken with workaround
  • P2 (High): Minor feature issue, edge case
  • P3 (Medium): Cosmetic issue
  • P4 (Low): Documentation typo

Reference: See BUG-TRACKING-TEMPLATE.csv for complete template with examples.

5. Quality Metrics Calculation

Calculate comprehensive QA metrics and quality gates status:

bash
python scripts/calculate_metrics.py <path/to/TEST-EXECUTION-TRACKING.csv>

Metrics dashboard includes:

  • Test execution progress (X/Y tests, Z% complete)
  • Pass rate (passed/executed %)
  • Bug analysis (unique bugs, P0/P1/P2 breakdown)
  • Quality gates status (✅/❌ for each gate)

Quality gates (all must pass for release):

GateTargetBlocker
Test Execution100%Yes
Pass Rate≥80%Yes
P0 Bugs0Yes
P1 Bugs≤5Yes
Code Coverage≥80%Yes
Security90% OWASPYes

6. Progress Reporting

Generate QA reports for stakeholders:

Daily summary (end-of-day):

  • Tests executed, pass rate, bugs filed
  • Blockers (or None)
  • Tomorrow's plan

Weekly report (every Friday):

  • Use template: WEEKLY-PROGRESS-REPORT.md (created by init script)
  • Compare against baseline: BASELINE-METRICS.md
  • Assess quality gates and trends

Reference: See references/llm_prompts_library.md for 30+ ready-to-use reporting prompts.

7. Security Testing (OWASP)

Implement OWASP Top 10 security testing:

Coverage targets:

  1. A01: Broken Access Control - RLS bypass, privilege escalation
  2. A02: Cryptographic Failures - Token encryption, password hashing
  3. A03: Injection - SQL injection, XSS, command injection
  4. A04: Insecure Design - Rate limiting, anomaly detection
  5. A05: Security Misconfiguration - Verbose errors, default credentials
  6. A07: Authentication Failures - Session hijacking, CSRF
  7. Others: Data integrity, logging, SSRF

Target: 90% OWASP coverage (9/10 threats mitigated).

Each security test follows AAA pattern with specific attack vectors documented.

Day 1 Onboarding

For new QA engineers joining a project, complete 5-hour onboarding guide:

Read: references/day1_onboarding.md

Timeline:

  • Hour 1: Environment setup (database, dev server, dependencies)
  • Hour 2: Documentation review (test strategy, quality gates)
  • Hour 3: Test data setup (users, CLI, DevTools)
  • Hour 4: Execute first test case
  • Hour 5: Team onboarding & Week 1 planning

Checkpoint: By end of Day 1, environment running, first test executed, ready for Week 1.

Autonomous Execution (⭐ Recommended)

Enable LLM-driven autonomous QA testing with single master prompt:

Read: references/master_qa_prompt.md

Features:

  • Auto-resume from last completed test (reads tracking CSV)
  • Auto-execute test cases (Week 1-5 progression)
  • Auto-track results (updates CSV after each test)
  • Auto-file bugs (creates bug reports for failures)
  • Auto-generate reports (daily summaries, weekly reports)
  • Auto-escalate P0 bugs (stops testing, notifies stakeholders)

Benefits:

  • 100x faster execution vs manual
  • Zero human error in tracking
  • Consistent bug documentation
  • Immediate progress visibility

Usage: Copy master prompt, paste to LLM, let it run autonomously for 5 weeks.

Adapting for Your Project

Small Project (50 tests)

  • Timeline: 2 weeks
  • Categories: 2-3 (e.g., Frontend, Backend)
  • Daily: 5-7 tests
  • Reports: Daily summary only

Medium Project (200 tests)

  • Timeline: 4 weeks
  • Categories: 4-5 (CLI, Web, API, DB, Security)
  • Daily: 10-12 tests
  • Reports: Daily + weekly

Large Project (500+ tests)

  • Timeline: 8-10 weeks
  • Categories: 6-8 (multiple components)
  • Daily: 10-15 tests
  • Reports: Daily + weekly + bi-weekly stakeholder

Reference Documents

Access detailed guidelines from bundled references:

  • `references/day1_onboarding.md` - 5-hour onboarding guide for new QA engineers
  • `references/master_qa_prompt.md` - Single command for autonomous LLM execution (100x speedup)
  • `references/llm_prompts_library.md` - 30+ ready-to-use prompts for specific QA tasks
  • `references/google_testing_standards.md` - AAA pattern, coverage thresholds, fail-fast validation
  • `references/ground_truth_principle.md` - Preventing doc/CSV sync issues (critical for test suite integrity)

Assets & Templates

Test case templates and bug report formats:

  • `assets/templates/TEST-CASE-TEMPLATE.md` - Complete template with CLI and security examples

Scripts

Automation scripts for QA infrastructure:

  • `scripts/init_qa_project.py` - Initialize QA infrastructure (one command setup)
  • `scripts/calculate_metrics.py` - Generate quality metrics dashboard

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Starting Fresh QA

1. python scripts/init_qa_project.py my-app ./
2. Fill in BASELINE-METRICS.md (document current state)
3. Write test cases using assets/templates/TEST-CASE-TEMPLATE.md
4. Copy master prompt from references/master_qa_prompt.md
5. Paste to LLM → autonomous execution begins

Pattern 2: LLM-Driven Testing (Autonomous)

1. Read references/master_qa_prompt.md
2. Copy the single master prompt (one paragraph)
3. Paste to LLM conversation
4. LLM executes all 342 test cases over 5 weeks
5. LLM updates tracking CSVs automatically
6. LLM generates weekly reports automatically

Pattern 3: Adding Security Testing

1. Read references/google_testing_standards.md (OWASP section)
2. Write TC-SEC-XXX test cases for each OWASP threat
3. Target 90% coverage (9/10 threats)
4. Document mitigations in test cases

Pattern 4: Third-Party QA Handoff

1. Ensure all templates populated
2. Verify BASELINE-METRICS.md complete
3. Package tests/docs/ folder
4. Include references/master_qa_prompt.md for autonomous execution
5. QA team can start immediately (Day 1 onboarding → 5 weeks testing)

Success Criteria

This skill is effective when:

  • ✅ Test cases are reproducible by any engineer
  • ✅ Quality gates objectively measured
  • ✅ Bugs fully documented with repro steps
  • ✅ Progress visible in real-time (CSV tracking)
  • ✅ Autonomous execution enabled (LLM can execute full plan)
  • ✅ Third-party QA teams can start testing immediately

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
daymade
커뮤니티

github-ops

Operates GitHub via gh CLI and REST/GraphQL — PRs, issues, Actions, repos, collaborators, org permissions, 2FA — with explicit target, authorization, and independent readback. Use when a write reports success but state didn't change, or choosing gh/REST/GraphQL/UI-only. Not for local Git recovery (use git-safety-net), maintainer PR review (use github-review-pr), or upstream contribution (use github-contributor).

설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
10월 20일
daymade
커뮤니티

audio-router

Routes audio: StepFun ASR/语音识别, StepFun TTS/配音, transcript/妙记→会议纪要, merge/review minutes. Reads one bundled specialist; generic ASR and correction stay direct.

설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
10월 20일
daymade
커뮤니티

product-analysis

Multi-path parallel product analysis with cross-model test-time compute scaling. Spawns parallel agents (Claude Code agent teams + Codex CLI) to explore product from multiple perspectives, then synthesizes findings into actionable optimization plans. Can invoke competitors-analysis for competitive benchmarking. Use when "product audit", "self-review", "发布前审查", "产品分析", "analyze our product", "UX audit", or "信息架构审计".

설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
1.5천
업데이트
10월 15일
daymade
커뮤니티

fact-checker

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
1.4천
업데이트
10월 4일