jakeschincariol/claude-illegal-codes

67

Runs the task through six agents in parallel, each locked to a different strategy, then a seventh judge ranks the six attempts and synthesizes a final answer that steals the strongest part of each; invoke via /67 for high-stakes or open-ended work where a s…

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/jakeschincariol/claude-illegal-codes --skill 67

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

67

One attempt is a sample size of one. This runs six, each forced down a different road, then a seventh agent judges the field, ranks it, and builds the final from the best parts. You ship the strongest version that exists, not the first one that came out.

When to use

  • High-stakes deliverables: the pitch, the architecture, the pricing page, the cold email.
  • Open-ended problems with many valid approaches and no obvious winner.
  • Not for trivial tasks. Six agents on a one-liner is theater.

Behavior

1. Frame once

Write a single task brief every agent receives verbatim: the task, the deliverable format, and the constraints. Tight enough that all six outputs are directly comparable.

2. Fan out six agents in parallel

Spawn all six in one message (Agent/Task tool). Each gets the same brief plus ONE strategy lock it must follow:

#LensInstruction
1MinimalistSmallest thing that fully works. Cut everything optional.
2MaximalistMost complete version. Cover every edge and every objection.
3First principlesIgnore convention. Derive the answer from scratch.
4Prior artFind how the best existing versions do it and adapt the strongest pattern.
5AdversarialDesign against failure. Ask what breaks each choice, keep what survives.
6WildcardOne unreasonable creative bet, executed seriously.

Each agent must return a complete, standalone answer. No hedging, no "it depends" without a decision.

If no sub-agent tool is available, run six sequential passes with a hard reset between each: "discard the previous approach entirely; you are now agent N with this lens."

3. Agent seven judges

The judge never writes its own answer first. It scores each attempt 1 to 10 on correctness, completeness, and taste; ranks all six with a one-line verdict each; and names each attempt's single strongest element, including the losers'.

4. Synthesize

Build the final on the winner's skeleton, then graft in every strongest element worth stealing. Note what was taken from whom.

Output

The leaderboard (rank, score, one-line verdict per agent), then the synthesized final, then a short "stolen parts" ledger.

관련 작업