nexu-io/open-design

research-decision-room

Turn messy user research notes, interviews, support tickets, surveys, and product context into an evidence-backed decision room: a single HTML artifact with an evidence ledger, theme map, confidence heatmap, opportunity matrix, decision memo, and experiment…

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill research-decision-room

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Research Decision Room Skill

Create a single-page HTML decision artifact that helps a product or design team turn messy evidence into a clear next move. The output is not a decorative research deck. It is a working room for debate: evidence, themes, confidence, tradeoffs, and recommended experiments stay visible together.

Resource map

text
research-decision-room/
├── SKILL.md
├── example.html
└── references/
    ├── checklist.md
    └── evidence-model.md

Read references/evidence-model.md before synthesis and run references/checklist.md before emitting the artifact.

When to use this skill

Use this skill when the user has any mix of:

  • Interview notes, usability-test observations, support tickets, sales call notes,

app-store reviews, NPS comments, survey open text, analytics snippets, or product-decision context.

  • A decision that needs evidence: "Should we build X?", "Which onboarding path

should we try?", "Why are users dropping off?", "What do customers actually mean by slow?"

  • A need to share findings with stakeholders who will not read a long research

report.

Do not use it for pure visual inspiration, campaign ideation, or brand moodboards.

Workflow

Step 1 - Establish the decision frame

Identify the decision scope from the user's prompt. If the user did not give a decision, derive one from the evidence and label it as inferred.

Write a short frame with:

  • Decision question.
  • Audience or segment.
  • Time horizon.
  • Known constraints.
  • What this artifact will not decide.

If key context is missing and the task is not blocked, proceed with labelled assumptions instead of asking a broad question.

Step 2 - Build the evidence ledger

Normalize every useful signal into ledger rows using the model in references/evidence-model.md.

Each ledger row must include:

  • id: short stable id, such as I-03, T-14, M-02.
  • source_type: interview, usability, support, survey, analytics, sales, field

note, or stakeholder.

  • segment: user type or "unknown".
  • signal: one-sentence observation.
  • quote_or_metric: direct quote, metric, or "not provided".
  • strength: strong, medium, or weak.
  • limitations: why this evidence may be biased or incomplete.

Never invent quotes, participant counts, dates, revenue impact, or metrics. If the user did not provide a number, use "not provided" and explain what evidence would increase confidence.

Step 3 - Synthesize themes and tensions

Cluster evidence into 4 to 6 themes. For each theme:

  • Name the theme in plain human language.
  • List the evidence ids that support it.
  • Explain the behavior behind it, not just the UI complaint.
  • Mark confidence as high, medium, or low.
  • Note contradictions or segment differences.

Prefer verbs over nouns: "Teams abandon setup when the first blank state asks for too much" is better than "Onboarding problem".

Step 4 - Score opportunities

Create an opportunity matrix with 3 to 5 options. Score each option on a 1 to 5 scale:

  • Evidence strength.
  • User pain.
  • Business leverage.
  • Implementation risk, where 5 means low risk and 1 means high risk.

Show the total score, but do not let the score replace judgment. Add one sentence on why the top recommendation wins.

Step 5 - Draft the decision memo

Write a decision memo with:

  1. Recommended move.
  2. Why now.
  3. What evidence supports it.
  4. What could be wrong.
  5. What to measure next.
  6. Reversible next step.

Keep the memo short enough to read in under one minute.

Step 6 - Create the HTML artifact

Produce a self-contained index.html. Use the active DESIGN.md for typography, spacing, color roles, and component tone, but keep the information architecture stable:

  1. Header with decision question, confidence, and last-updated label.
  2. Executive readout with recommendation, risk, and next experiment.
  3. Evidence ledger with filter chips.
  4. Theme map with evidence ids and confidence.
  5. Opportunity matrix.
  6. Decision memo.
  7. Experiment queue with owner, metric, and success threshold.
  8. Assumptions and limitations.

The artifact should be interactive but durable. Simple vanilla JavaScript is allowed for filtering evidence, switching views, or highlighting related ids. No framework dependency is required.

Step 7 - Self-check and emit

Run the checklist. Then emit one concise orientation sentence and one HTML artifact:

xml
<artifact identifier="research-decision-room" type="text/html" title="Research Decision Room">
<!doctype html>
<html>...</html>
</artifact>

Nothing after the closing </artifact>.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills