posthog/ai-plugin

auditing-experiments-flags

Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations.

소스 보기
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Auditing experiments and feature flags

This skill teaches you how to run configuration audits on experiments and feature flags. All checks use the experiment and feature flag read tools (experiment-get, experiment-list, feature-flag-get-definition, feature-flag-get-all) — no SQL queries are needed for Phase 1 checks.

Usage modes

Quick check (single entity)

When the user asks about a specific experiment or flag:

  1. Fetch the entity via experiment-get (experiment ID) or feature-flag-get-definition (numeric flag ID).
  2. Apply the relevant checks from experiment checks or flag checks.
  3. Report findings inline as markdown, grouped by severity (CRITICAL first, then WARNING, then INFO).
  4. Include entity links as [Experiment: name](/experiments/id) or [Flag: key](/feature_flags/id).

Scoped audit (one domain)

When the user asks to audit all experiments or all flags:

  1. Bulk-fetch via experiment-list or feature-flag-get-all.
  2. Run all checks for that domain against each entity.
  3. Group findings by severity, then by entity.
  4. Report as inline markdown.

Full audit (comprehensive)

When the user asks for a comprehensive audit of both experiments and flags:

  1. Fetch all experiments via experiment-list and all flags via feature-flag-get-all.
  2. Run all experiment checks and all flag checks.
  3. Apply recurring patterns to identify patterns across multiple findings.
  4. If there are more than 5 entities with findings, output as a notebook artifact via notebooks-create for easier navigation. Otherwise report inline.

Output format

For each finding, include:

  • Severity badge: 🔴 CRITICAL, 🟡 WARNING, or 🔵 INFO
  • Check name: Which check produced this finding
  • Entity link: Markdown link to the entity
  • What's wrong: One-sentence description
  • Action: What to do about it (see remediation actions)

Example:

🟡 WARNING — Flag integration · Experiment: checkout-redesign The linked feature flag is inactive (paused). Traffic is not being split. Action: Re-enable the flag or end the experiment.

Handling unavailable data

Some checks require activity logs (feature-flags-activity-retrieve for flags), which may not be available in every session. If activity log data is unavailable:

  • Skip checkActivityHistory (experiment check) entirely.
  • Skip the "toggle instability" and "never activated" sub-checks in flag lifecycle checks.
  • In your report, note which checks were skipped and why:
Skipped: Activity history checks (activity logs not available via current tools)

Partial failures

If a fetch call fails for some entities:

  • Continue with the entities you could fetch.
  • Report which entities could not be assessed and why.
  • Do not silently omit entities from the audit.

Reference files

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
posthog
공식

assessing-heatmaps

Assesses what a page's heatmap is telling you and recommends concrete changes. Pulls click / rageclick / scroll-depth data for a URL, names the hot elements by cross-referencing autocapture events on the same page, and can create a saved heatmap the user opens in PostHog, then summarizes the behavior and proposes improvements.\nTRIGGER when: user asks what a heatmap shows, why people aren't clicking something, where users rage-click, how far they scroll, what to change on a page based on heatmap/click data, or to 'analyze/assess/review the heatmap' for a URL.\nDO NOT TRIGGER when: the user only wants to create a saved heatmap screenshot with no analysis (use heatmaps-saved-create directly), or is asking about session replay in general (use investigating-replay).

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
80
업데이트
9월 4일
posthog
공식

auditing-endpoints

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
80
업데이트
9월 4일
posthog
공식

authoring-data-quality-checks

Adds and runs data quality checks (dbt-test style assertions) on a project's warehouse tables and saved-query views: not-null, uniqueness, accepted values, referential integrity, row-count bounds, freshness, and custom HogQL. Use when asked to test a model, validate a view, check for nulls or duplicates, add data quality checks, find out why a number looks wrong, or judge whether a warehouse table is trustworthy before using it in an analysis. To describe what data means (metrics, certifications, joins), see setting-up-data-catalog instead. Trigger terms: data quality, data test, dbt test, not null check, uniqueness check, freshness check, referential integrity, row count check, validate model, is this table trustworthy.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
80
업데이트
9월 4일
posthog
공식

authoring-log-alerts

Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
80
업데이트
9월 4일