posthog/posthog

adding-project-secret-api-key-auth

How to gate a PostHog API endpoint with project secret API key (PSAK) auth — a project-scoped, user-less service credential.

소스 보기
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Adding project secret API key (PSAK) auth to an endpoint

What a PSAK is

A ProjectSecretAPIKey is a project-scoped, user-less service credential (posthog/models/project_secret_api_key.py). It behaves like a personal API key but survives users leaving the project, carries its own scopes, and authenticates as a synthetic user — not a real User row.

  • Token format: phs_... (Bearer header only — no body fallback, unlike the legacy token).
  • Scopes are project-wide within their resource type and deliberately ignore object-level access controls (per-resource RBAC).
  • Do not confuse with TeamSecretTokenAuthentication — that validates the legacy per-team Team.secret_api_token (also phs_-prefixed) and is only for feature-flag local evaluation and similar pre-PSAK surfaces. It is pegged for migrating to PSAK at some point.

Keys are managed at POST /api/environments/:id/project_secret_api_keys (label + scopes; plaintext value returned once; roll action to rotate; max 50 per project; wildcard * scope not allowed).

Wiring a viewset action — the checklist

The machinery is shipped but nothing is wired to it yet — the first planned consumer is the endpoints (the product) run action. Four things, all required:

1. Whitelist the scope/action pair

PSAK-assignable scopes are a global allowlist in posthog/scopes.py:

python
PROJECT_SECRET_API_KEY_ALLOWED_API_SCOPE_ACTION: list[tuple[APIScopeObject, APIScopeActions]] = [("endpoint", "read")]

If your product isn't listed, key creation rejects the scope before auth is ever attempted. Add your (scope_object, action) tuple here first.

Add the same scope to PROJECT_SECRET_API_KEY_ALLOWED_API_SCOPE_ACTION in frontend/src/lib/scopes.tsx. The scope picker in project settings builds its checkboxes from that list, so a backend-only change leaves users with no way to grant the scope. posthog/test/test_scopes.py compares the two lists.

2. Add the authenticator and opt in actions

python
class MyViewSet(TeamAndOrgViewSetMixin, viewsets.ModelViewSet):
    scope_object = "endpoint"
    authentication_classes = [ProjectSecretAPIKeyAuthentication]  # extends, TeamAndOrgViewSetMixin keeps session/PAK auth
    psak_allowed_actions = ["run"]

psak_allowed_actions is default-deny: APIScopePermission rejects any PSAK request whose action isn't listed ("This action does not support project secret API key access"). List only the programmatic actions — never CRUD that should stay human-driven.

APIScopePermission also enforces team binding automatically: a PSAK only works against view.team == key.team, so PSAK auth only makes sense on project-scoped (/api/environments/:id/...) routes.

3. Use PSAK-aware throttles

PersonalApiKeyRateThrottle subclasses silently bypass PSAK requests (no personal key → no throttling). Use the PSAK-aware pair from posthog/rate_limit.py:

  • PersonalOrProjectSecretApiKeyRateThrottle — per-key budget (keyed psak:{key_id}), also still throttles personal keys.
  • ProjectSecretApiKeyTeamRateThrottle — per-team aggregate (keyed psak-team:{team_id}), caps total PSAK load regardless of how many keys a project mints. Stack it alongside the per-key throttle.

Subclass them to set product-specific scope/rate; remember each throttle keeps its own cache bucket per scope string.

4. Handle the synthetic user

request.user is a ProjectSecretAPIKeyUser (a SyntheticUser, posthog/synthetic_user.py), not a User:

  • user.id is None — never use it as a foreign key. Use user.current_team_id.
  • has_perm() always returns False — Django permission checks silently deny.
  • Skip per-object access-control checks for it (PSAK scopes are project-wide by design):
python
  if is_authenticated_via_project_secret_api_key(request):
      return  # PSAK bypasses object-level RBAC deliberately

Use isinstance(user, ProjectSecretAPIKeyUser) only where no request is in scope.

  • report_user_action drops synthetic users — if you need analytics for PSAK-authenticated calls, capture explicitly with posthoganalytics.capture(distinct_id=user.distinct_id, ...) and include an auth_method property so both paths emit the same event shape.
  • HogQL system tables: Database.create_for hides RBAC-scoped system tables the key's scopes don't cover (via readable_system_table_access_scopes()).

Helpers in posthog/permissions.py when you need to branch: is_authenticated_via_project_secret_api_key(request) and is_service_auth(request) (covers PSAK + legacy team token).

What you get for free

  • Query tagging: the authenticator calls tag_authentication(access_method=AccessMethod.PROJECT_SECRET_API_KEY, api_key_mask=..., api_key_label=...), so ClickHouse query_log attribution works with no per-endpoint code. If you add a new authenticator, tag through tag_authentication (the single funnel in posthog/clickhouse/query_tagging.py) — not with ad-hoc tag_queries calls.
  • `last_used_at` tracking: updated at most hourly via .update() (bypasses ModelActivityMixin so routine auth doesn't spam the activity log).
  • Activity logging on key create/update/roll/delete.

Calling a PSAK-gated endpoint

bash
curl -s https://us.posthog.com/api/environments/<project_id>/<your_action_path>/ \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer phs_<key>" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{...}'

Testing

Mirror the PSAK sections of posthog/api/test/test_authentication.py, posthog/test/test_permissions.py, and posthog/test/test_rate_limit.py. Cover at minimum:

  • allowed action with correct scope → 200
  • action not in psak_allowed_actions → 403
  • missing/wrong scope → 403
  • key from another team's project → 403
  • non-PSAK auth on the same action still works
같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
posthog
공식

adding-personhog-rpc

Guide for adding a new RPC to personhog-replica and personhog-router. Covers eligibility checks, proto definition, code generation for Python and Node.js clients, Rust implementation (storage trait, postgres queries, service handler, router wiring), and index compatibility validation. Use when adding a new gRPC endpoint to personhog, migrating a Django ORM query to personhog, or extending the personhog service API.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
4만
업데이트
10월 8일
posthog
공식

adopting-generated-api-types

Use when migrating frontend code from manual API client calls (api.get, api.create, api.surveys.get, api.dashboards.list, new ApiRequest()) and handwritten TypeScript interfaces to generated API functions and types. Triggers on files importing from lib/api, files with api.get . , manual interface definitions that duplicate backend serializers, or any frontend file that constructs API URLs by hand. Covers the full replacement workflow — finding the generated equivalent, swapping imports, adapting

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
4만
업데이트
10월 8일
posthog
공식

depot-container-builds

Configures and runs Depot remote container builds using depot build and depot bake. Use when building Docker images, creating Dockerfiles with Depot, pushing images to registries, building multi-platform/multi-arch images (linux/amd64, linux/arm64), debugging container build failures, optimizing Dockerfile layer caching, using docker-bake.hcl or docker-compose builds, or migrating from docker build / docker buildx build to Depot. Also use when the user mentions depot build, depot bake, container

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
4만
업데이트
10월 8일
posthog
공식

depot-github-runners

Configures Depot-managed GitHub Actions runners as a drop-in replacement for GitHub-hosted runners. Use when setting up or migrating GitHub Actions workflows to use Depot runners, choosing runner sizes (CPU/RAM), configuring runs-on labels, setting up ARM or Windows or macOS runners, troubleshooting GitHub Actions runner issues, configuring egress filtering, using Depot Cache with GitHub Actions, or running Dagger/Dependabot on Depot runners. Also use when the user mentions depot-ubuntu, depot-w

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
4만
업데이트
10월 8일