사용 방법
- 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
- 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
- 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/qinglele-hy/codex-chinese-technical-writing-skill --skill chinese-citation-ready-writing시작 전 확인
- 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
- 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서
원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.
Chinese Citation-Ready Writing
Core Workflow
- Identify the requested genre: thesis section, research background, significance, literature-style discussion, lab reflection, course summary, or report paragraph.
- Extract the user's concrete topic, method, system, dataset, project, or experiment name.
- Write the finished Chinese text directly unless the user asks for an outline.
- Anchor the prose in concrete evidence:
- cases,
- numbers,
- measurable indicators,
- engineering constraints,
- comparison dimensions,
- task-specific terminology.
- For thesis-like writing, connect claims to citation-friendly metrics such as accuracy, recall, missed detection rate, false detection rate, mAP, FPS, latency, dataset scale, or deployment constraints.
- For short lab reflections, use a formal but natural three-part flow: what was practiced, what problems were encountered, and what was learned.
- Revise toward the user's tone corrections quickly; avoid repeating generic policy or textbook background.
Decision Rules
- Produce submit-ready Chinese, not meta-analysis about how to write.
- Avoid empty claims such as "it is very important" unless followed by a concrete reason.
- Prefer specific technical nouns over broad slogans.
- If source material is provided, stay close to its topic and structure.
- When citations are needed but source citations are unavailable, write citation-compatible wording without inventing fake references.
- For undergraduate or course writing, keep the style formal, practical, and believable.
Common Shapes
- Thesis background and significance: start from the real problem, describe current bottlenecks, introduce the method, then state practical and research value.
- Literature-style paragraph: compare methods by metrics and scenario fit.
- Lab reflection: describe operation, debugging, and capability gained.
- Project summary: state system function, implementation path, test result, and limitations.
Verification
- The text is in polished Chinese and can be pasted directly.
- The topic matches the user's actual project or experiment.
- At least one concrete case, metric, or task-specific detail supports the main claim when the task is thesis-like.
- No fake citations or unverifiable reference numbers were invented.
- The output avoids generic filler and repeats only what is useful.
