shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps

scope-creep-detector

- Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files.

소스 보기
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

Scope Creep Detector

A one-line fix should not require a reviewer to reverse-engineer fourteen files across three subsystems. This skill compares a git diff with its stated intent, surfaces scope signals, and turns them into keep, split, or justify decisions.

Everything runs locally. The script makes no network calls and does not change the working tree, index, commits, or branches.

When to use

  • Before opening a pull request whose diff may have grown beyond its intent
  • When a bug fix touches unexpected files or subsystems
  • When the user asks whether staged changes are too broad
  • When a diff includes dependency, public API, config, CI, or build changes
  • When the user wants a concrete split plan for a mixed change

When not to use

  • Formatting code, running a linter, or writing a commit message
  • Reviewing correctness, security, or test quality inside an agreed scope
  • Measuring historical project growth across many commits
  • Editing or reverting files without the user's approval

Establish the intent

Use the user's one-line intent when available. Keep it concrete, such as fix null dereference in parser or add retry limit to webhook delivery.

If no intent was given, the script falls back to the current branch name. If that name is generic, detached, or unrelated to the work, ask for one line of intent before treating relatedness as meaningful.

Run the classifier

Run from this skill directory and point --repo at the target repository.

Working tree diff:

bash
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Staged diff:

bash
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --staged \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Branch diff against a merge base:

bash
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --base main \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Saved diff or stdin:

bash
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff change.diff --intent "parser fix" --json
git diff --staged | python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff - \
  --intent "parser fix" --json

Use --hunk-threshold only when the repository has a documented reason to change the default churn threshold. Do not tune the threshold merely to make a warning disappear.

Interpret the JSON

Read references/scope-signals.md before making a recommendation. Treat the classifier as triage evidence, not proof of authorial intent.

  • in_scope: file paths with at least one intent/path keyword overlap
  • likely_creep: paths without overlap, with the reason and detected signals
  • new_deps: dependencies introduced in supported manifest formats
  • api_renames: nearby removed and added public function or class declarations
  • config_edits: CI, container, build, YAML, and TOML changes
  • stats: churn, subsystem counts, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files

Empty arrays are evidence too. Say that no signal was detected, not that the diff is guaranteed to be in scope.

Recommend keep, split, or justify

Give every item in likely_creep one disposition:

  1. Keep when the path is necessary for the stated intent and the connection

is direct. Explain the connection in one sentence.

  1. Split when it can land independently, belongs to another subsystem, or

introduces a dependency, API rename, config edit, or large hunk that is not required for the intent. Name the files or hunks for the follow-up change.

  1. Justify when a cross-cutting edit cannot be separated safely. State the

invariant or build constraint that requires it and call out reviewer risk.

Prefer split when evidence is ambiguous. Never claim that a zero overlap score proves a file is unrelated. Path vocabulary is a cheap, deterministic proxy.

Write the scope report

Use this compact structure:

  1. Intent and diff source
  2. Files and subsystems touched, with total additions and deletions
  3. In-scope changes
  4. Likely creep with signal evidence
  5. Keep, split, or justify table
  6. Proposed follow-up grouping, if any

Name file paths and hunk headers. For an oversized mixed hunk, explain that the script cannot split it automatically and describe the smallest coherent edit. Ask before applying any split, revert, staging, or commit operation.

Files

  • scripts/scope_creep.py: deterministic unified-diff parser and classifier
  • references/scope-signals.md: signal definitions, thresholds, and limits
같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
shubhamsaboo
커뮤니티

project-graveyard

- Scans the developer's machine for dead side projects, autopsies each one from its git history (died at the payments wall, killed by a newer project, finished but never shipped), surfaces their personal death patterns, and picks the corpse most worth resurrecting — then helps ship it. Use when the user mentions abandoned, unfinished, or old side projects, asks "what should I finish", wants to revive or resurrect a project, says "run the graveyard", wonders why they never finish anything, or is about to start a new project that sounds like one they already built. Runs entirely locally.

설치 수
2
GitHub Stars
13.8만
업데이트
9월 12일
shubhamsaboo
커뮤니티

advisor-orchestrator-worker

- Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap workers execute, or says "too big for one model" or "fan this out". Not for single-file edits or tasks one model handles in one pass.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
13.8만
업데이트
9월 12일
shubhamsaboo
커뮤니티

commit-archaeologist

- Reconstructs why code exists from local git history, including the introducing commit, later changes, current authors, repeated companion files, and likely intent. Use when the user asks "why does this code exist", "who wrote this function and why", or to "explain the history of this function" before a rewrite, refactor, or risky edit. Runs entirely locally.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
13.8만
업데이트
9월 12일
shubhamsaboo
커뮤니티

dependency-doctor

- Checks requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, and package.json dependency manifests for surface-level direct-dependency footguns: standard-library shadowing pins, abandoned backports, unpinned dependencies, and obvious intra-manifest conflicts, plus opt-in PyPI yanked releases. Use when the user asks to check a manifest for dependency problems, asks why dependencies won't install or whether anything is wrong with their dependencies, wants a dependency autopsy, or suspects dependency manifest rot. Runs offline by default as a local tool for the user's own project, not repository CI.

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
13.8만
업데이트
9월 12일