yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

synthesize-meta-analytic-evidence

Design or execute a quantitative evidence synthesis with pairwise/network/cumulative/heterogeneity/bias modes while preserving study-level quality and sensitivity logic.

소스 보기

사용 방법

  1. 설치 명령을 복사하고 자신의 에이전트 환경에 설치하기 전에 소스 패키지를 확인하세요.
  2. 필요한 도구, 인증 정보, 지원 환경은 원본 문서에서 확인하세요.
  3. 입력과 원하는 산출물을 설명하고 출처와 결과를 대조하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill synthesize-meta-analytic-evidence

시작 전 확인

  • 설치에는 모델 구독, API 한도, 파일 접근 권한이 포함되지 않습니다.
  • 별점 수와 설치 수는 활동 지표이며 독립적인 품질·보안 검증이 아닙니다.
원본 Skill 문서

원본 저장소의 제목, 예시, 코드, 표, 링크, 이미지를 유지해 표시합니다.

synthesize-meta-analytic-evidence

Purpose

Design or execute quantitative evidence synthesis while preserving study-level quality, heterogeneity, bias, and sensitivity logic.

When to use / not applicable

Use when multiple studies or comparable effect estimates must be combined. Not applicable when evidence is a single case or no comparable outcome can be defined.

Input contract

yaml
mode_contracts:
  pairwise: &meta_input
    required: [study_records, outcome_definition, effect_measure]
    optional: [comparison_network, subgroup_plan, prior_quality_assessments]
    constraints: [study_level_provenance_required]
  network: *meta_input
  cumulative: *meta_input
  heterogeneity: *meta_input
  bias: *meta_input

Execution protocol

Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.

  1. You MUST load skill formulate-meta-analysis-scope to define outcome, effect measure, and inclusion boundary. You MUST load skill design-study-inclusion to define study-level inclusion and quality fields.
  2. You MUST load skill plan-effect-size to plan effect-size calculation. You MUST load skill design-data-extraction to extract condition, sample, uncertainty, and provenance. You MUST load skill audit-study-validity to retain study-validity judgments.
  3. Select one mode: pairwise, network, cumulative, heterogeneity, or bias.
  4. You MUST load skill assess-sensitivity to run sensitivity checks and synthesize estimates with uncertainty and exclusions.

If the synthesis exposes a mechanism-level explanatory gap, consider formulate-hypotheses as the next tactic.

Mode branches

  • pairwise: pool directly comparable effect sizes, report sampling uncertainty and study-quality judgments with sensitivity analyses, and stop only after at least 80% of every declared pairwise floor is met.
  • network: compare N>=3 methods using direct and indirect evidence. You MUST load skill construct-evidence-network to construct the direct and indirect evidence network.
  • cumulative: update the estimate as studies arrive; retain order and stopping state. You MUST load skill update-cumulative-evidence to perform the ordered cumulative updates.
  • heterogeneity: investigate between-study variation; preserve I2 interpretation bands. You MUST load skill analyze-heterogeneity to analyze between-study variation.
  • bias: test publication, selection, and small-study bias; do not treat absence of evidence as absence of bias. You MUST load skill assess-publication-bias to assess publication, selection, and small-study bias.

Output contract

yaml
mode_contracts:
  pairwise:
    produces: [question, inclusion_criteria, studies_included, effect_size_type, model, heterogeneity_plan, sensitivity_plan, bias_assessment_plan, reporting]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  network:
    produces: [question, network_geometry, inclusion_criteria, studies_included, effect_size_type, model, transitivity_assessment, ranking_method, heterogeneity_plan, inconsistency_plan, sensitivity_plan, bias_assessment_plan, reporting]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  cumulative:
    produces: [question, temporal_scope, inclusion_criteria, studies_included, chronological_order, effect_size_type, model, temporal_analyses, time_lag_bias, quality_trend, reporting]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  heterogeneity:
    produces: [question, heterogeneity_metrics, moderator_candidates, investigation_plan, a_priori_hypotheses, multiple_testing, reporting]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  bias:
    produces: [question, bias_domains, grey_literature_search, grade_assessment, sensitivity_plan, reporting]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]

Thresholds and quality gates

  • Evidence-acquisition gates use relative coverage, not fixed study/web counts. Declare the eligible evidence universe (or current evidence pool), then record numerator, denominator, batch increment, stopping reason, and source references.
  • Pairwise/network/cumulative/heterogeneity/bias modes stop when marginal information gain falls below the declared, justified floor across consecutive batches; report coverage ratio, independent-source ratio, and saturation state.
  • effect-size-extraction and quality-assessment-protocol must cover the declared eligible records at the justified relative floor; do not substitute an unreasoned absolute count.
  • If k >= 10, pre-specified subgroup/meta-regression investigation is required where applicable.
  • I2 interpretation bands are retained: 0-40% low, 30-60% moderate, 50-90% substantial, 75-100% considerable; overlaps are source wording and must not be silently normalized.

Failure and counterexamples

Reject synthesis when study identity, outcome definition, or effect measure is missing. Flag disconnected network, incomparable conditions, unplanned subgrouping, and bias tests with insufficient studies.

Provenance map

meta-analysis, pairwise-synthesis, network-comparison, cumulative-tracking, heterogeneity-investigation, bias-detection, effect-size-extraction, quality-assessment-protocol, evidence-synthesis-planning; all source gates kept, repeated provider details compressed.

Legacy context checkpoint / Delta notes

Append study set, extraction table, estimate, uncertainty, heterogeneity/bias decisions, and unresolved comparability questions.

Preserved source criteria ledger

sourcesource linekindsource criterion
meta-analysis29numeric\\Multi-method comparison \\network-comparison \\Comparing N>=3 methods with indirect evidence \\
meta-analysis62numeric-table\\risk-of-bias-assessment \\Assess methodological bias (RoB2/PROBAST/QUADAS-2) \\
meta-analysis73numeric-table\\pairwise-synthesis \\30 \\30 \\40 \\
meta-analysis74numeric-table\\network-comparison \\50 \\80 \\60 \\
meta-analysis75numeric-table\\cumulative-tracking \\40 \\40 \\30 \\
meta-analysis76numeric-table\\heterogeneity-investigation \\30 \\30 \\50 \\
meta-analysis77numeric-table\\bias-detection \\40 \\40 \\40 \\
pairwise-synthesis33numeric-table\\Studies identified \\20 \\30 \\
pairwise-synthesis34numeric-table\\Effect sizes extracted \\20 \\30 \\
pairwise-synthesis35numeric-table\\Web searches \\25 \\40 \\
pairwise-synthesis36numeric-table\\Quality assessments \\15 \\30 \\
pairwise-synthesis38numericBudget gate: cannot exit until 80% of floor met.
pairwise-synthesis43textual<HARD-GATE>
pairwise-synthesis46numeric-table\\Studies found \\0 \\20 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
pairwise-synthesis47numeric-table\\Effect sizes planned \\0 \\20 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
pairwise-synthesis48numeric-table\\Web searches done \\0 \\25 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
pairwise-synthesis49numeric-table\\Quality assessed \\0 \\15 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
pairwise-synthesis50textual</HARD-GATE>
pairwise-synthesis84numericIterate steps 3-5 until budget floor is met. Check state ledger before each iteration.
network-comparison25numericDesign a network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol comparing N>=3 methods simultaneously, leveraging both direct and indirect evidence.
network-comparison35numeric-table\\Studies identified \\35 \\50 \\
network-comparison36numeric-table\\Effect sizes extracted \\55 \\80 \\
network-comparison37numeric-table\\Web searches \\40 \\60 \\
network-comparison38numeric-table\\Network nodes (methods) \\3 \\N \\
network-comparison39numeric-table\\Quality assessments \\25 \\50 \\
network-comparison41numericBudget gate: cannot exit until 80% of floor met.
network-comparison46textual<HARD-GATE>
network-comparison49numeric-table\\Studies found \\0 \\35 \\50 \\BLOCKED \\
network-comparison50numeric-table\\Effect sizes planned \\0 \\55 \\80 \\BLOCKED \\
network-comparison51numeric-table\\Web searches done \\0 \\40 \\60 \\BLOCKED \\
network-comparison52numeric-table\\Network nodes \\0 \\3 \\N \\BLOCKED \\
network-comparison53numeric-table\\Quality assessed \\0 \\25 \\50 \\BLOCKED \\
network-comparison54textual</HARD-GATE>
network-comparison92numericIterate steps 3-6 until budget floor met. Verify network connectivity after each batch.
cumulative-tracking34numeric-table\\Studies identified \\28 \\40 \\
cumulative-tracking35numeric-table\\Effect sizes extracted \\28 \\40 \\
cumulative-tracking36numeric-table\\Web searches \\20 \\30 \\
cumulative-tracking37numeric-table\\Temporal coverage (years) \\5 \\10+ \\
cumulative-tracking38numeric-table\\Quality assessments \\20 \\40 \\
cumulative-tracking40numericBudget gate: cannot exit until 80% of floor met.
cumulative-tracking45textual<HARD-GATE>
cumulative-tracking48numeric-table\\Studies found \\0 \\28 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
cumulative-tracking49numeric-table\\Effect sizes planned \\0 \\28 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
cumulative-tracking50numeric-table\\Web searches done \\0 \\20 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
cumulative-tracking51numeric-table\\Year range covered \\0 \\5 \\10+ \\BLOCKED \\
cumulative-tracking52numeric-table\\Quality assessed \\0 \\20 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
cumulative-tracking53textual</HARD-GATE>
heterogeneity-investigation28numericWhen a meta-analysis reveals substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%, significant Q-test, large tau2), this strategy designs the investigation protocol: subgroup analyses, meta-regression, moderator identification, and outlier diagnostics. Produces the investigation plan, not the computation.
heterogeneity-investigation34numeric-table\\Studies identified \\20 \\30 \\
heterogeneity-investigation35numeric-table\\Effect sizes extracted \\20 \\30 \\
heterogeneity-investigation36numeric-table\\Web searches \\35 \\50 \\
heterogeneity-investigation37numeric-table\\Moderator candidates \\5 \\10+ \\
heterogeneity-investigation38numeric-table\\Quality assessments \\15 \\30 \\
heterogeneity-investigation40numericBudget gate: cannot exit until 80% of floor met.
heterogeneity-investigation45textual<HARD-GATE>
heterogeneity-investigation48numeric-table\\Studies found \\0 \\20 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
heterogeneity-investigation49numeric-table\\Effect sizes planned \\0 \\20 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
heterogeneity-investigation50numeric-table\\Web searches done \\0 \\35 \\50 \\BLOCKED \\
heterogeneity-investigation51numeric-table\\Moderators identified \\0 \\5 \\10+ \\BLOCKED \\
heterogeneity-investigation52numeric-table\\Quality assessed \\0 \\15 \\30 \\BLOCKED \\
heterogeneity-investigation53textual</HARD-GATE>
heterogeneity-investigation70textual\\effect-size-planning \\Standardize for comparability \\
bias-detection35numeric-table\\Studies identified \\28 \\40 \\
bias-detection36numeric-table\\Effect sizes extracted \\28 \\40 \\
bias-detection37numeric-table\\Web searches \\28 \\40 \\
bias-detection38numeric-table\\Bias domains assessed \\5 \\8 \\
bias-detection39numeric-table\\Quality assessments \\20 \\40 \\
bias-detection41numericBudget gate: cannot exit until 80% of floor met.
bias-detection46textual<HARD-GATE>
bias-detection49numeric-table\\Studies found \\0 \\28 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
bias-detection50numeric-table\\Effect sizes planned \\0 \\28 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
bias-detection51numeric-table\\Web searches done \\0 \\28 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
bias-detection52numeric-table\\Bias domains assessed \\0 \\5 \\8 \\BLOCKED \\
bias-detection53numeric-table\\Quality assessed \\0 \\20 \\40 \\BLOCKED \\
bias-detection54textual</HARD-GATE>
bias-detection62numeric-table\\quality-assessment-protocol \\Full RoB2 assessment per study \\
effect-size-extraction77textual## Minimum Yield
effect-size-extraction80numeric- At least 5 studies processed
effect-size-extraction81numeric- At least 5 effect sizes extracted or calculation planned
quality-assessment-protocol24numeric-table\\RCT \\RoB 2.0 \\Randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement, selection \\
quality-assessment-protocol26numeric-table\\Diagnostic accuracy \\QUADAS-2 \\Patient selection, index test, reference standard, flow/timing \\
quality-assessment-protocol28textual\\Observational \\Newcastle-Ottawa \\Selection, comparability, outcome/exposure \\
quality-assessment-protocol56textual## Minimum Yield
quality-assessment-protocol59numeric- At least 5 studies assessed
evidence-synthesis-planning41numeric- Knapp-Hartung adjustment: recommended when k < 20 studies
evidence-synthesis-planning51numeric- Investigation: pre-specified subgroups, meta-regression (if k >= 10)
evidence-synthesis-planning52numeric- Thresholds: I2 interpretation (0-40% low, 30-60% moderate, 50-90% substantial, 75-100% considerable)
evidence-synthesis-planning80textual## Minimum Yield
evidence-synthesis-planning86numeric- At least 3 sensitivity analyses designed

Context checkpoint / Delta notes

Append study set, extraction table, estimate, uncertainty, heterogeneity/bias decisions, and unresolved comparability questions.

관련 작업

같은 저장소의 Skills

더 많은 Skills

모든 Skills