codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

verify

Run a comprehensive 7-phase verification pipeline for .NET projects: build, analyzers, antipattern detection, tests, security, formatting, and diff review.

Ver código-fonte

Como usar

  1. Copie o comando e verifique o pacote antes de instalar no seu ambiente de agente.
  2. Consulte no original as ferramentas, credenciais e ambientes necessários.
  3. Descreva os dados de entrada e a entrega esperada; confira a saída com as fontes.
npx skills add https://github.com/codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit --skill verify

Antes de começar

  • A instalação não inclui assinatura de modelo, franquia API ou acesso aos seus arquivos.
  • Estrelas e instalações indicam atividade, não um teste independente de qualidade ou segurança.
Documento original do Skill

Renderizado do repositório de origem, preservando títulos, exemplos, código, tabelas, links e imagens.

/verify -- 7-Phase Verification Pipeline

What

Runs a sequential, 7-phase verification pipeline that catches issues at every level -- from compiler errors to subtle antipatterns to formatting drift. Each phase produces an explicit PASS, WARN, or FAIL with details. "It looks fine" is not a verification result; a table of statuses is. Critical failures (Phase 1 build, Phase 4 tests) short-circuit the pipeline because later phases cannot produce meaningful results on broken code.

The pipeline answers one question: "Is this code ready for review?"

PhaseToolWhat It CatchesCritical
1. Builddotnet buildCompilation errors, missing referencesYes
2. Diagnosticsget_diagnostics (MCP)New analyzer warnings, nullability issuesFAIL on new errors
3. Antipatternsdetect_antipatterns (MCP)async void, sync-over-async, DateTime.Now, moreNo
4. Testsdotnet testFailing tests, regressionsYes
5. Securitydotnet list package --vulnerable + scanSecrets, SQL injection, missing auth, vulnerable packagesFAIL on critical/high
6. Formatdotnet format --verify-no-changesStyle drift, formatting inconsistenciesNo
7. Diff Reviewgit diff analysisAccidental changes, debug leftovers, TODOsNo

When

  • After completing a feature, bug fix, or major refactor
  • Before creating a pull request -- non-negotiable, full pipeline
  • After merging upstream changes or updating dependencies
  • When the user says "verify", "check everything", "is this ready", "run all checks"
  • As the final step before marking a task complete

Which Phases to Run

Full pipeline is the default. For scoped changes, run a subset:

ScenarioPhasesNotes
Feature complete / Pre-PR / new endpointAll 7No shortcuts
Bug fix1, 2, 4Add a test first if none covers it
After refactor1, 2, 3, 4Correctness focus; add 5-7 if security-sensitive
Dependency update1, 4, 5Build, tests, vulnerability scan
Config or test-only change1, 4Build and test
Formatting only6Format check is sufficient

When in doubt, run all 7. Extra phases cost minutes; a missed security issue costs days of incident response. Never cherry-pick phases because a change "looks safe".

How

Phase 1: Build (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

bash
dotnet build --no-restore --verbosity quiet
  • If the build fails, STOP. Report errors and fix before continuing -- nothing

downstream is meaningful on code that does not compile.

  • Capture the warning count even on PASS; new warnings are tracked in Phase 2.
  • Output: PASS (0 errors) or FAIL (with error list)

Phase 2: Diagnostics

Use the Roslyn MCP get_diagnostics tool, scoped to changed files/projects (full solution for cross-cutting changes). Compare against baseline -- flag only NEW warnings introduced by the current changes. Common findings: CS8600/CS8602 (nullability), CS0219 (unused variable).

Output: PASS (0 new) / WARN (new warnings) / FAIL (new errors). Treat new warnings as work -- today's CS8600 is next month's production NullReferenceException.

Phase 3: Antipattern Detection

Use the Roslyn MCP detect_antipatterns tool on changed files (full project for broad changes). Catches: async void, sync-over-async (.Result, .GetAwaiter().GetResult()), new HttpClient(), DateTime.Now/UtcNow instead of TimeProvider, broad catch (Exception), string interpolation in logging, missing CancellationToken, EF read queries without AsNoTracking.

Output: PASS (0 findings) / WARN (findings) / FAIL (critical antipatterns)

Phase 4: Tests (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

bash
dotnet test --no-build --verbosity quiet
  • Full suite, or scoped to affected test projects for large solutions.
  • Any failing test is a FAIL -- no exceptions. Stop and fix before later phases.
  • If no test project exists: SKIP with a recommendation to add tests.

Output: PASS (all green) or FAIL (failing test names + error messages)

Phase 5: Security Scan

bash
dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive

Then review changed files for: hardcoded secrets/connection strings/API keys, SQL injection (raw SQL without parameterization), missing [Authorize] on endpoints that need it, permissive CORS, missing input validation, disabled HTTPS or certificate validation.

Output: PASS / WARN (medium/low findings) / FAIL (critical/high vulnerabilities)

Phase 6: Format Check

bash
dotnet format --verify-no-changes --verbosity quiet

Reports drift without auto-fixing. To resolve, run dotnet format and include the changes in the commit. If no .editorconfig exists, note it as a recommendation.

Output: PASS / WARN (with file list)

Phase 7: Diff Review

Analyze git diff --stat and git diff (staged + unstaged) for:

  • Accidental or unrelated file changes (.vs/, bin/, obj/, .env, secrets)
  • Debug leftovers (Console.WriteLine, #if DEBUG in production paths)
  • Unresolved TODO/HACK/FIXME markers
  • Scope mismatch -- changes must match the task/PR description

Output: PASS (clean, matches intent) / WARN (with findings)

Fix-and-Retry Loop

A single pass rarely produces all-green. The loop is the point:

  1. IDENTIFY -- which phase failed, and the specific error
  2. FIX -- make the minimal change that resolves it
  3. RE-RUN -- from Phase 1 if the fix changed code; otherwise from the failed phase
  4. REPEAT -- until all phases pass, or an issue needs user input

Final Summary

## Verification Results

| Phase | Result | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| 1. Build | PASS | 0 errors, 0 warnings |
| 2. Diagnostics | PASS | 0 new diagnostics |
| 3. Antipatterns | WARN | 1 missing CancellationToken |
| 4. Tests | PASS | 47 passed, 0 failed |
| 5. Security | PASS | No findings |
| 6. Format | PASS | Clean |
| 7. Diff Review | WARN | 1 TODO marker found |

**Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW** (with 2 non-blocking warnings)

Verdicts: READY FOR REVIEW (all PASS, or only non-blocking WARNs) or NEEDS FIXES (any FAIL, with specific remediation steps). For pre-PR runs, include the verification report in the PR description.

Example

User: /verify

Claude: Running 7-phase verification pipeline...

Phase 1: Build ............ PASS (0 errors)
Phase 2: Diagnostics ...... PASS (0 new warnings)
Phase 3: Antipatterns ..... WARN
  - src/Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs:42 -- DateTime.Now usage, use TimeProvider
Phase 4: Tests ............ PASS (23 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped)
Phase 5: Security ......... PASS
Phase 6: Format ........... PASS
Phase 7: Diff Review ...... PASS

Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW (1 non-blocking warning)

Recommendation: Replace DateTime.Now with TimeProvider on line 42 before
merging. Not blocking, but it will fail the antipattern check in CI.

Related

  • /build-fix -- Auto-fix build errors when Phase 1 fails
  • /code-review -- Multi-dimensional review once verification passes
  • /health-check -- Whole-project graded assessment (beyond this change set)

Relacionados por tarefa

do mesmo repositório

Mais Skills

Todos os Skills
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

clean-architecture

Clean Architecture for .NET applications. Covers the 4-project layout (Domain, Application, Infrastructure, Api), dependency inversion, use case handlers, domain entities with behavior, and infrastructure as a plugin. Load this skill when building a project with Clean Architecture, discussing layered architecture, dependency inversion, use cases, or when the architecture-advisor recommends Clean Architecture.

Instalações / 1h
3
GitHub Stars
797
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

arch-check

Architecture conformance check: verifies an existing codebase against its declared architecture (VSA, Clean Architecture, DDD, Modular Monolith) — dependency direction, layer violations, module boundary leaks, and cycles — using token-cheap Roslyn MCP analysis. Invoke when: "check architecture", "architecture violations", "layer violations", "dependency direction", "module boundaries", "arch check", "is my architecture clean", "enforce architecture", "conformance check". For CHOOSING an architec

Instalações / 1h
2
GitHub Stars
789
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

aspire

.NET Aspire for cloud-native orchestration. Covers AppHost configuration, service defaults, resource configuration, service discovery, and the Aspire dashboard. Load this skill when setting up local development orchestration, service discovery, or Aspire-managed infrastructure, or when the user mentions "Aspire", "AppHost", "service defaults", "service discovery", "orchestration", "Aspire dashboard", "AddProject", "WithReference", or "cloud-native .NET".

Instalações / 1h
2
GitHub Stars
789
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

build-fix

Autonomous iteration loops for .NET: drive a broken build or failing test suite to green with bounded iterations, progress detection, and fail-safe guards that prevent infinite retries and wasted tokens. The build-fix loop (dotnet build, parse, categorize, fix, rebuild) is the primary flow; the test-fix loop is a first-class variant. Invoke when the build is broken, after a major refactor or dependency update, or when the user says "fix the build", "build is broken", "make it compile", "make the

Instalações / 1h
2
GitHub Stars
789
Atualizado
7 de ago.