codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit

verify

Run a comprehensive 7-phase verification pipeline for .NET projects: build, analyzers, antipattern detection, tests, security, formatting, and diff review.

Ver código-fonte
Documento original do Skill

Renderizado do repositório de origem, preservando títulos, exemplos, código, tabelas, links e imagens.

/verify -- 7-Phase Verification Pipeline

What

Runs a sequential, 7-phase verification pipeline that catches issues at every level -- from compiler errors to subtle antipatterns to formatting drift. Each phase produces an explicit PASS, WARN, or FAIL with details. "It looks fine" is not a verification result; a table of statuses is. Critical failures (Phase 1 build, Phase 4 tests) short-circuit the pipeline because later phases cannot produce meaningful results on broken code.

The pipeline answers one question: "Is this code ready for review?"

PhaseToolWhat It CatchesCritical
1. Builddotnet buildCompilation errors, missing referencesYes
2. Diagnosticsget_diagnostics (MCP)New analyzer warnings, nullability issuesFAIL on new errors
3. Antipatternsdetect_antipatterns (MCP)async void, sync-over-async, DateTime.Now, moreNo
4. Testsdotnet testFailing tests, regressionsYes
5. Securitydotnet list package --vulnerable + scanSecrets, SQL injection, missing auth, vulnerable packagesFAIL on critical/high
6. Formatdotnet format --verify-no-changesStyle drift, formatting inconsistenciesNo
7. Diff Reviewgit diff analysisAccidental changes, debug leftovers, TODOsNo

When

  • After completing a feature, bug fix, or major refactor
  • Before creating a pull request -- non-negotiable, full pipeline
  • After merging upstream changes or updating dependencies
  • When the user says "verify", "check everything", "is this ready", "run all checks"
  • As the final step before marking a task complete

Which Phases to Run

Full pipeline is the default. For scoped changes, run a subset:

ScenarioPhasesNotes
Feature complete / Pre-PR / new endpointAll 7No shortcuts
Bug fix1, 2, 4Add a test first if none covers it
After refactor1, 2, 3, 4Correctness focus; add 5-7 if security-sensitive
Dependency update1, 4, 5Build, tests, vulnerability scan
Config or test-only change1, 4Build and test
Formatting only6Format check is sufficient

When in doubt, run all 7. Extra phases cost minutes; a missed security issue costs days of incident response. Never cherry-pick phases because a change "looks safe".

How

Phase 1: Build (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

bash
dotnet build --no-restore --verbosity quiet
  • If the build fails, STOP. Report errors and fix before continuing -- nothing

downstream is meaningful on code that does not compile.

  • Capture the warning count even on PASS; new warnings are tracked in Phase 2.
  • Output: PASS (0 errors) or FAIL (with error list)

Phase 2: Diagnostics

Use the Roslyn MCP get_diagnostics tool, scoped to changed files/projects (full solution for cross-cutting changes). Compare against baseline -- flag only NEW warnings introduced by the current changes. Common findings: CS8600/CS8602 (nullability), CS0219 (unused variable).

Output: PASS (0 new) / WARN (new warnings) / FAIL (new errors). Treat new warnings as work -- today's CS8600 is next month's production NullReferenceException.

Phase 3: Antipattern Detection

Use the Roslyn MCP detect_antipatterns tool on changed files (full project for broad changes). Catches: async void, sync-over-async (.Result, .GetAwaiter().GetResult()), new HttpClient(), DateTime.Now/UtcNow instead of TimeProvider, broad catch (Exception), string interpolation in logging, missing CancellationToken, EF read queries without AsNoTracking.

Output: PASS (0 findings) / WARN (findings) / FAIL (critical antipatterns)

Phase 4: Tests (CRITICAL -- short-circuits)

bash
dotnet test --no-build --verbosity quiet
  • Full suite, or scoped to affected test projects for large solutions.
  • Any failing test is a FAIL -- no exceptions. Stop and fix before later phases.
  • If no test project exists: SKIP with a recommendation to add tests.

Output: PASS (all green) or FAIL (failing test names + error messages)

Phase 5: Security Scan

bash
dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive

Then review changed files for: hardcoded secrets/connection strings/API keys, SQL injection (raw SQL without parameterization), missing [Authorize] on endpoints that need it, permissive CORS, missing input validation, disabled HTTPS or certificate validation.

Output: PASS / WARN (medium/low findings) / FAIL (critical/high vulnerabilities)

Phase 6: Format Check

bash
dotnet format --verify-no-changes --verbosity quiet

Reports drift without auto-fixing. To resolve, run dotnet format and include the changes in the commit. If no .editorconfig exists, note it as a recommendation.

Output: PASS / WARN (with file list)

Phase 7: Diff Review

Analyze git diff --stat and git diff (staged + unstaged) for:

  • Accidental or unrelated file changes (.vs/, bin/, obj/, .env, secrets)
  • Debug leftovers (Console.WriteLine, #if DEBUG in production paths)
  • Unresolved TODO/HACK/FIXME markers
  • Scope mismatch -- changes must match the task/PR description

Output: PASS (clean, matches intent) / WARN (with findings)

Fix-and-Retry Loop

A single pass rarely produces all-green. The loop is the point:

  1. IDENTIFY -- which phase failed, and the specific error
  2. FIX -- make the minimal change that resolves it
  3. RE-RUN -- from Phase 1 if the fix changed code; otherwise from the failed phase
  4. REPEAT -- until all phases pass, or an issue needs user input

Final Summary

## Verification Results

| Phase | Result | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| 1. Build | PASS | 0 errors, 0 warnings |
| 2. Diagnostics | PASS | 0 new diagnostics |
| 3. Antipatterns | WARN | 1 missing CancellationToken |
| 4. Tests | PASS | 47 passed, 0 failed |
| 5. Security | PASS | No findings |
| 6. Format | PASS | Clean |
| 7. Diff Review | WARN | 1 TODO marker found |

**Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW** (with 2 non-blocking warnings)

Verdicts: READY FOR REVIEW (all PASS, or only non-blocking WARNs) or NEEDS FIXES (any FAIL, with specific remediation steps). For pre-PR runs, include the verification report in the PR description.

Example

User: /verify

Claude: Running 7-phase verification pipeline...

Phase 1: Build ............ PASS (0 errors)
Phase 2: Diagnostics ...... PASS (0 new warnings)
Phase 3: Antipatterns ..... WARN
  - src/Features/Orders/CreateOrder.cs:42 -- DateTime.Now usage, use TimeProvider
Phase 4: Tests ............ PASS (23 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped)
Phase 5: Security ......... PASS
Phase 6: Format ........... PASS
Phase 7: Diff Review ...... PASS

Verdict: READY FOR REVIEW (1 non-blocking warning)

Recommendation: Replace DateTime.Now with TimeProvider on line 42 before
merging. Not blocking, but it will fail the antipattern check in CI.

Related

  • /build-fix -- Auto-fix build errors when Phase 1 fails
  • /code-review -- Multi-dimensional review once verification passes
  • /health-check -- Whole-project graded assessment (beyond this change set)
do mesmo repositório

Mais Skills

Todos os Skills
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

api-versioning

API versioning strategies for ASP.NET Core. Covers Asp.Versioning library, URL segment, header, and query string strategies, version deprecation, and OpenAPI integration. Load this skill when adding versioning to an API, evolving an API with breaking changes, or when the user mentions "API version", "versioning", "v1/v2", "Asp.Versioning", "deprecation", "breaking change", or "backward compatibility".

instalações
2
GitHub Stars
692
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

arch-check

Architecture conformance check: verifies an existing codebase against its declared architecture (VSA, Clean Architecture, DDD, Modular Monolith) — dependency direction, layer violations, module boundary leaks, and cycles — using token-cheap Roslyn MCP analysis. Invoke when: "check architecture", "architecture violations", "layer violations", "dependency direction", "module boundaries", "arch check", "is my architecture clean", "enforce architecture", "conformance check". For CHOOSING an architecture, use architecture-advisor instead.

instalações
2
GitHub Stars
692
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

architecture-advisor

Architecture selection advisor for .NET applications. Asks structured questions about domain complexity, team size, system lifetime, compliance, and integration needs, then recommends the best-fit architecture: Vertical Slice, Clean Architecture, DDD + Clean Architecture, or Modular Monolith. Load this skill when the user asks "which architecture", "choose architecture", "set up project", "new project", "architecture decision", "restructure", or "how should I organize". Always load BEFORE any architecture-specific skill.

instalações
2
GitHub Stars
692
Atualizado
7 de ago.
codewithmukesh
Comunidade

aspire

.NET Aspire for cloud-native orchestration. Covers AppHost configuration, service defaults, resource configuration, service discovery, and the Aspire dashboard. Load this skill when setting up local development orchestration, service discovery, or Aspire-managed infrastructure, or when the user mentions "Aspire", "AppHost", "service defaults", "service discovery", "orchestration", "Aspire dashboard", "AddProject", "WithReference", or "cloud-native .NET".

instalações
2
GitHub Stars
692
Atualizado
7 de ago.