onewave-ai/claude-skills

browser-test-loop

Use to actually verify a web change in a real browser instead of assuming it works — click through a flow, catch console errors, check a form submits, confirm a fix on the page.

Ver código-fonte

Como usar

  1. Copie o comando e verifique o pacote antes de instalar no seu ambiente de agente.
  2. Consulte no original as ferramentas, credenciais e ambientes necessários.
  3. Descreva os dados de entrada e a entrega esperada; confira a saída com as fontes.
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill browser-test-loop

Antes de começar

  • A instalação não inclui assinatura de modelo, franquia API ou acesso aos seus arquivos.
  • Estrelas e instalações indicam atividade, não um teste independente de qualidade ou segurança.
Documento original do Skill

Renderizado do repositório de origem, preservando títulos, exemplos, código, tabelas, links e imagens.

Browser Test Loop

Code that compiles is not code that works. This is the loop that closes the gap between "the diff looks right" and "the page does the thing".

Core Behavior

Drive a real browser against the running app, assert on what actually rendered, and fix what fails. Never report a UI change as working on the strength of the diff alone.

Setup

Playwright is the default. It installs its own browsers and runs headless in CI.

bash
npm i -D @playwright/test && npx playwright install chromium

Start the app first and hold the port — a test suite against a dead server produces a wall of timeouts that tells you nothing:

bash
npm run dev > /tmp/dev.log 2>&1 &
npx wait-on http://localhost:3000

The Loop

  1. Name the assertion in one sentence. "After submitting the contact form with a valid email, a success message appears and no console error fires." Vague goals produce vague tests.
  2. Write the smallest script that proves it. One flow per file.
  3. Run it. Read the failure, not the summary.
  4. Fix the app, not the test — unless the test encoded the wrong expectation, in which case say so out loud.
  5. Re-run until green, then run it once more from a cold start to catch state that leaked between runs.

What to Assert

  • The user-visible outcome: text on screen, a URL change, a row that appeared.
  • Zero unexpected console errors. Collect them explicitly; a silent React error boundary looks like a blank success.
  • Network calls that should have fired, and their status codes.
  • The empty, loading, and error states — not just the happy path.
js
const errors = []
page.on('console', m => m.type() === 'error' && errors.push(m.text()))
page.on('pageerror', e => errors.push(e.message))
// ... drive the flow ...
expect(errors).toEqual([])

Selector Rules

Query the way a person looks at a page: role, label, and visible text. getByRole('button', { name: 'Send' }) survives a restyle; .btn-primary > span:nth-child(2) does not. Add data-testid only where the visible text is genuinely ambiguous.

Screenshots

Take one on failure automatically, and one at the end of a flow when a human needs to eyeball the result. Full-page for layout questions, element-scoped for a component. Save under /tmp unless the user wants them kept.

bash
npx playwright test --reporter=line 2>&1 | tail -30

Pipe the output. A full Playwright HTML reporter dump is thousands of tokens of nothing.

Common Failure Modes

SymptomReal cause
Every test times outApp never started, or wrong port
Passes locally, fails headlessAnimation or viewport size, not logic
Flaky on CI onlyWaiting on a timeout instead of a condition
Blank page, no errorClient-side exception swallowed by an error boundary
Works once, fails on re-runTest wrote state it never cleaned up

Never fix flake with waitForTimeout. Wait for the condition — a selector, a response, a URL.

Reporting

Say what flow was driven, what was asserted, and the result. If something is still unverified, name it. Screenshots go with the answer when the question was visual.

Relacionados por tarefa

do mesmo repositório

Mais Skills

Todos os Skills