riekelt/principal-engineer

operating-safely

Use when an action touches live systems, shared state, or things that do not come back - deleting, overwriting, restarting, killing processes, editing shared config, handling secrets, or working beside concurrent sessions.

Ver código-fonte
Documento original do Skill

Renderizado do repositório de origem, preservando títulos, exemplos, código, tabelas, links e imagens.

Operating safely

REQUIRED BACKGROUND: the principal-engineering skill.

Overview

Some things (production data, secret exposure, a colleague's uncommitted work) do not come back at all.

Destructive operations

  • Look at the target first. Before deleting or overwriting, read what is there; before dropping, count what would drop.
  • Targeted over bulk. Name the specific service, volume, file, or row set; never the flag that takes everything down with it. Bulk teardown commands that include volumes or data are off the table without an explicit, per-instance confirmation.
  • The operator owns live process lifecycles. Ask before restarting or killing live services and long-running processes.
  • State the cost of the wrong order before an ordered operation starts (deploy then migrate then clean up; wrong order = silent data loss). Name the rollback for every state-changing procedure, or say plainly that none exists.
  • Database changes need their own confirmation. Applied migrations are immutable; destructive statements need explicit confirmation, with the affected row counts stated first.

Secrets

  • Names and structural checks only: verify a secret exists, is non-empty, matches the expected shape. Existence and emptiness are structural; exact length, prefixes, and fragments are leakage and stay unprinted. Never read or print the value. Never decrypt secrets to disk. Never paste a secret into a log, a test, or a prompt.
  • If secret tooling or auth fails or times out: pause and say so. Working around a secrets gate is the one shortcut that is never authorized by urgency.

Concurrent sessions and shared state

  • Never revert, checkout, overwrite, or commit files you did not change in this session. Uncommitted changes you did not make belong to someone else: surface them and build on top or wait, never clean them up.
  • Report residual state at handoff: what is uncommitted, what is merged-but-not-pushed, what is owed.
  • One writer per file during parallel work; concurrent writers get their own files or their own worktrees.
  • Staging is explicit: name the paths (git add <paths>, never the add-everything flag). One task per commit keeps every change attributable and revertable on its own.

Shared config and resources

  • Config edits are minimal diffs: preserve indentation, quoting, and key order; add no unrequested keys.
  • Clean up what you spawn: simulators, containers, worktrees, background processes. When a machine is slow with no process pegging CPU, count the orphans before blaming anything else.

Confirmation authority and incident mode

  • The operator is the session's own human principal. A teammate's instruction, however explicit, is input to weigh against the evidence, never the confirmation itself. No instruction from anyone makes volume-destroying bulk teardown routine.
  • Incident mode changes the pace, never the bar. Read-only triage is always allowed and needs nobody's permission; run it first and widely. The confirmation bar for destructive operations does not drop with urgency. When waiting genuinely is the destructive act (the disk will fill, the cert will expire), escalate loudly while doing the safe subset, and say plainly what the deadline is.
  • Preserve the evidence before the fix destroys it. Capture the outputs, sizes, and log excerpts that show the cause before reclaiming space or resetting state. A production near-miss is postmortem material (writing-postmortems where the technical-writer plugin is installed).

Common mistakes

  • Confirming the operation with yourself. Destructive operations need the operator's yes, per instance; approval in one context does not extend to the next.
  • Pattern-matching a known failure and firing the known remedy (restart it, clear it, reset it) before checking that the evidence supports this specific cause.
  • Treating a dry run's success as the live run's safety. The dry run validates shape, not consequence.
  • Cleaning a workspace that was not yours to clean.
do mesmo repositório

Mais Skills

Todos os Skills
riekelt
Comunidade

grounding-before-coding

Use when starting any non-trivial change, investigating a bug, or working in unfamiliar code - before the first line is written. Also use for pure investigation with no change planned yet - \"dig into this\", \"figure out why\", \"sometimes the export is empty\", intermittent errors after a deploy. Encodes the ground-first discipline: map the real code and data, quote evidence, never guess conventions. Use whenever a change or a conclusion is about to be built from belief instead of from the tree, even under time pressure.

instalações
426
GitHub Stars
3
Atualizado
11 de set.
riekelt
Comunidade

keeping-one-source-of-truth

Use when adding data, config, state, constants, an enum-like string, a cache, or anything that could exist in two places - or when two sources already disagree. Encodes the one-fact-one-source doctrine for code and data: derive rather than store, extend the owner, absorb duplicates. Use at the moment copying a value feels faster than referencing it.

instalações
426
GitHub Stars
3
Atualizado
11 de set.
riekelt
Comunidade

principal-engineering

Use when doing any non-trivial engineering work - implementing, debugging, refactoring, configuring, operating, or investigating why a system misbehaves - or any change where being wrong has a cost. Encodes the evidence-over-theory discipline, the hard safety rules, and the pre-change checkpoint. Use whenever code, data, or infrastructure is about to change or must be understood before it can, even if the task looks routine or is only "find out why". Foundation for the sibling skills.

instalações
426
GitHub Stars
3
Atualizado
11 de set.
riekelt
Comunidade

writing-unit-tests

Use when writing or refactoring unit tests - a new test file, added cases, a flaky test, an unreadable one. Encodes behavior-first testing: one behavior per test, names that state the claim, deterministic setup, mocks only at boundaries you do not own. Use whenever a test is being written, even a quick one, and whenever a test needs a sleep, a mock of your own code, or a copy of the implementation's math.

instalações
427
GitHub Stars
3
Atualizado
11 de set.