amplitude/mcp-marketplace

diff-intake

Reads a PR or branch diff and produces a structured YAML change brief for downstream analytics instrumentation skills.

查看源码
仓库原始内容

按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。

diff-intake

Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.

Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize

Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.

Fetching changes

  • PR URL

gh pr view <number-or-url> gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"'

  • Branch comparison

git log <main|master>..<branch> git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch>

  • Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.

Categorize files

Assign each file to a category based on its path:

  • Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
  • Generated: anything with generated in its path
  • Testing: test files
  • Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
  • Documentation: READMEs, docs/
  • Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations

For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).

Step 2: Build the file summary map

Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.

Fetching detailed diffs

  • PR

gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOid Using the response, get a detailed diff git diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>

  • Branch comparison

git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>

For each file, record

  • summary — 2-line summary of what changed
  • stack — frontend, backend, or shared

Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces

While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:

  • user_facing_changes — a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter

to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.

  • surfaces.components — the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other

interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.

For each surface, record:

  • name — component, route, page, hook, or surface name
  • file — repo-relative path
  • changeadded, modified, or deleted

If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit surfaces.components rather than inventing one.

Step 3: Classify the overall change

Infer the change type and analytics scope:

TypeAnalytics implication
featHigh — new surfaces likely need tracking
fixLow–Medium — may affect existing event conditions
refactorLow — tracking paths may move, regression risk
perfLow — usually no tracking impact
revertMedium — need to check what tracking was lost
style / docs / test / build / ci / choreNone — skip analytics analysis

analytics_scope = highest implication present:

  • none — only no-impact types
  • low — only perf/refactor
  • medium — fix
  • high — any feature or capability addition

If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.

Step 4: Emit the YAML brief

Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in filesummarymap (no globs).

yaml
change_brief:
  classification:
    primary: feat           # dominant conventional commit type
    types: [feat, fix]      # all types detected
    analytics_scope: high   # none | low | medium | high
    stack: frontend         # frontend | backend | fullstack
  summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"
  user_facing_changes:
    - "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."
  surfaces:
    components:
      - name: "AvatarUpload"
        file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
        change: modified
  file_summary_map:         # each entry includes a layer field
    - file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
      summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"
      layer: frontend       # frontend | backend | shared
    - file: "src/api/upload.ts"
      summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"
      layer: backend
来自同一仓库

更多 Skills

全部 Skills
amplitude
社区

add-analytics-instrumentation

End-to-end analytics instrumentation workflow for a PR, branch, file, directory, or feature. Reads the code, discovers what events should be tracked, and produces a concrete instrumentation plan — all in one shot. Use this skill whenever a user wants to add analytics to a PR, asks "instrument this PR", "add tracking to this branch", "what analytics does this file need", "instrument the checkout flow", "run the full instrumentation workflow", or any request that implies going from code changes to a tracking plan. Also trigger when the user gives you a PR link, branch name, file path, or feature description and mentions analytics, events, or instrumentation. This is the main entry point for the analytics workflow — prefer it over calling the individual steps (diff-intake, discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) separately.

安装量
30
GitHub Stars
34
最近更新
8月24日
amplitude
社区

discover-analytics-patterns

Discovers how analytics tracking calls are actually written in this codebase — the concrete SDK calls, function signatures, and import patterns used to send events. Use this skill whenever you need to understand the existing analytics instrumentation patterns before adding new tracking, when someone asks "how do we track events here?", "show me the analytics setup", "what's the analytics pattern in this codebase?", or any time the instrument-events or discover-event-surfaces skills are about to run and you need to know the correct coding style to follow. Outputs a deduplicated list of patterns with generalized examples and the file paths where each pattern appears, plus the dominant event and property naming conventions inferred from those call sites. Always use this skill before writing any analytics instrumentation code.

安装量
30
GitHub Stars
34
最近更新
8月24日
amplitude
社区

discover-event-surfaces

Given a changebrief YAML (output from diff-intake), generates an exhaustive list of candidate analytics events to instrument. Takes the perspective of an engineer with a PM mindset — surfaces everything worth considering so a PM can decide what actually matters. Use this as step 2 of the analytics instrumentation workflow, immediately after diff-intake produces a changebrief. Trigger whenever a user has a changebrief YAML and wants to know what analytics events to add, or asks "what should I track for this PR", "what events should I instrument", "generate event candidates", or any request to surface analytics coverage gaps for a code change.

安装量
30
GitHub Stars
34
最近更新
8月24日
amplitude
社区

instrument-events

Given eventcandidates YAML (output from discover-event-surfaces), generates a concrete instrumentation plan for priority-3 (critical) events. Acts as a Software Architect: discovers existing analytics patterns in the codebase, reads the hinted files to determine what variables are in scope, designs minimal chart-useful properties, and identifies the exact insertion point for each tracking call. Outputs a structured JSON trackingPlan. Use this as step 3 of the analytics instrumentation workflow, after discover-event-surfaces. Trigger whenever a user has eventcandidates and wants to generate tracking code, asks "instrument these events", "generate tracking plan", "add analytics for these events", "where should I put the tracking calls", or any request to turn event candidates into concrete implementation guidance.

安装量
30
GitHub Stars
34
最近更新
8月24日