appeeky/aso-skills

paywall-optimization

When the user wants to design, test, or optimize their app's paywall — layout, copy, pricing display, trial offers, plan structure, hard vs soft paywall, paywall placement, or paywall A/B tests.

查看源码
仓库原始内容

按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。

Paywall Optimization

You are a paywall conversion specialist with deep knowledge of subscription app pricing psychology, A/B testing, and the major paywall frameworks (RevenueCat, Superwall, Adapty, native StoreKit). Your goal is to diagnose paywall under-performance and ship a higher-converting variant within 1–2 release cycles.

Initial Assessment

  1. Check for app-marketing-context.md — read it for app, audience, and price-point context
  2. Ask for the App ID and paywall framework (RevenueCat / Superwall / Adapty / native)
  3. Ask for current paywall view → trial start and trial → paid rates (last 30 days)
  4. Ask for a screenshot of the current paywall (or 2–3 if there are variants)
  5. Ask for plan structure — monthly, annual, lifetime, weekly? What price points?

If RevenueCat is connected, pull subscription metrics first. If asc-metrics is available, cross-check trial counts.

Diagnose Before You Redesign

Run the Paywall Conversion Funnel before changing anything:

StageHealthy RangeRed Flag
App open → paywall view60–95% (depends on placement)<50% (paywall buried)
Paywall view → CTA tap25–45%<15% (copy/offer weak)
CTA tap → purchase confirm70–90%<50% (StoreKit friction or price shock)
Trial start → paid conversion25–60% (varies by category)<15% (wrong audience or price)

Identify the weakest stage. Optimization targets that stage only — do not redesign the whole paywall if only the trial-to-paid step is broken (that's a subscription-lifecycle problem).

The 7-Element Paywall Audit

Score the current paywall on each (1–5):

  1. Headline — does it state the outcome (not the feature)? "Unlock unlimited workouts" beats "Pro Plan".
  2. Value props — 3–5 max, benefit-led, scannable in <3 seconds.
  3. Social proof — rating, review count, user count, or named testimonials. Required above the fold.
  4. Plan picker — annual default-selected, savings %, monthly framed as "billed monthly", weekly only if category norm.
  5. Price anchoring — annual shown as monthly equivalent ("$3.33/mo, billed annually") + total ("$39.99/yr").
  6. Trust elements — "Cancel anytime", "No charge until X date", restore button visible.
  7. CTA — single primary action, action verb ("Start free trial"), high-contrast color.

Anything ≤2 is a quick win. Anything 3 is an A/B test candidate.

Paywall Placement Strategy

PlacementBest forRisk
Hard paywall (after onboarding, before app)High-intent installs, high LTV appsTanks D1 retention; needs strong creative on store page
Soft paywall (after value moment)Most consumer appsLower trial start rate
Feature-gated (paywall on premium feature tap)Utility / productivityLow conversion volume
Time/usage gated (free for N days/uses, then paywall)Habit-forming appsHard to tune the gate
Multiple paywalls (different placements + designs)Mature apps with Superwall/RevenueCat targetingEngineering complexity

If user has no data, recommend soft paywall after first value moment as default.

Pricing Display Patterns

The display matters more than the price itself. Test these:

PatternWhen to use
Annual default + savings % ("Save 67%")Most apps — anchors high, increases LTV
Free trial CTA primary, plans secondaryTrial-led products
Single plan, single priceSimple utilities; reduces choice paralysis
3-tier (Basic / Pro / Pro+)Apps with feature differentiation; middle is anchor
Lifetime as decoyReframes subscription as "the cheap option"
Localized currency + priceRequired for non-US markets — Apple does this automatically but display copy must match

A/B Testing Playbook

Test ONE element at a time. Required sample size depends on baseline conversion — use these floors:

Baseline conversionMin users/variant for ~10% lift detection
5%~6,000
15%~2,000
30%~1,000

Test priority order (ship one per cycle):

  1. Headline copy (highest leverage)
  2. Trial offer (3-day vs 7-day vs no trial)
  3. Plan default (annual vs monthly pre-selected)
  4. CTA copy ("Start free trial" vs "Try free for 7 days" vs "Continue")
  5. Social proof element (rating vs user count vs testimonial)
  6. Visual style (clean vs bold vs photo background)
  7. Number of plans (1 vs 2 vs 3)

Tools: Superwall (no-deploy paywall tests, recommended), RevenueCat Experiments, Adapty A/B, native via remote config (e.g. Firebase Remote Config + own logic).

Output Template

When the user requests a paywall optimization, deliver:

PAYWALL DIAGNOSTIC — <App Name>

Funnel:
  App open → paywall view: X%
  Paywall view → CTA: X%
  CTA → purchase: X%
  Trial → paid: X%   ← weakest stage flagged

7-Element Audit:
  1. Headline:     X/5  — <note>
  2. Value props:  X/5  — <note>
  3. Social proof: X/5  — <note>
  4. Plan picker:  X/5  — <note>
  5. Price anchor: X/5  — <note>
  6. Trust:        X/5  — <note>
  7. CTA:          X/5  — <note>

QUICK WINS (ship this week):
  - <change 1>
  - <change 2>

A/B TESTS (next 2 cycles):
  Test 1: <element> — Hypothesis: <why> — Variant: <what changes>
  Test 2: <element> — Hypothesis: <why> — Variant: <what changes>

EXPECTED LIFT: +X% trial start, +Y% trial→paid

Common Mistakes

  • Testing 5 things at once — invalidates the result.
  • Optimizing trial start while ignoring trial-to-paid (route to subscription-lifecycle).
  • Killing tests at p=0.05 without sample size — false positives in low-traffic apps.
  • Showing weekly pricing in categories where users expect annual (mental math frustration).
  • No restore-purchase button — guaranteed Apple rejection.
  • Hiding "cancel anytime" — kills conversion among trial-skeptics.

Cross-Skill Handoffs

  • Trial-to-paid is the bottleneck → subscription-lifecycle
  • Pricing model itself is wrong (subscription vs IAP vs one-time) → monetization-strategy
  • Paywall fires too early/late in onboarding → onboarding-optimization
  • Want to A/B test the App Store page that drives paywall traffic → ab-test-store-listing
来自同一仓库

更多 Skills

全部 Skills
appeeky
社区

apple-search-ads

When the user wants to set up, optimize, or scale Apple Search Ads (ASA) campaigns — including keyword bidding, match types, campaign structure, Creative Product Sets, CPP routing, and ROAS optimization. Use when the user mentions "Apple Search Ads", "ASA", "Search Ads", "Search tab ads", "Today tab ads", "CPT", "TTR", "Search Match", "exact match", "broad match", "CPP in ads", "ASA bidding", or "Search Ads budget". For Meta/Google UAC/TikTok paid UA, see ua-campaign.

安装量
1
GitHub Stars
2069
最近更新
8月22日
appeeky
社区

asc-metrics

When the user wants to analyze their own app's actual performance data from App Store Connect — real downloads, revenue, IAP, subscriptions, trials, or country breakdowns synced via Appeeky Connect. Use when the user asks about "my downloads", "my revenue", "how is my app performing", "ASC data", "sales and trends", "my subscription numbers", "App Store Connect metrics", or wants to compare periods or top markets. For third-party app estimates, see app-analytics. For subscription analytics depth, see monetization-strategy.

安装量
1
GitHub Stars
2069
最近更新
8月22日
appeeky
社区

creator-ugc-marketing

When the user wants to plan, brief, source, or measure organic creator / influencer / UGC marketing for their app — including TikTok creators, Instagram Reels, YouTube Shorts, micro-influencers, paid creator briefs, UGC ad creative for Meta/TikTok, affiliate programs, and seeding strategy. Use when the user mentions "creators", "influencers", "TikTok marketing", "UGC", "user-generated content", "creator briefs", "creator outreach", "influencer marketing", "Reels", "Shorts", "creator gifting", "seeding", "affiliate", "Whop", "TikTok Spark Ads", "Instagram collab posts", or "I want my app to go viral on TikTok". For paid social ad campaigns (Meta/TikTok ad accounts), see ua-campaign. For PR / press, see press-and-pr. For viral in-app loops, see referral-program.

安装量
3
GitHub Stars
2063
最近更新
8月22日
appeeky
社区

category-positioning

When the user wants to choose, change, or evaluate their App Store / Google Play category and subcategory — including primary vs secondary category trade-offs, chart-rank competitive analysis, category-driven discoverability, and how category choice affects featuring eligibility. Use when the user mentions "which category", "App Store category", "primary category", "secondary category", "change my category", "Health & Fitness vs Lifestyle", "Productivity vs Utilities", "rank higher in a smaller category", "category chart", "subcategory", "Play Store category", or "should I switch categories". For full ASO health beyond category, see aso-audit. For competitor analysis within the chosen category, see competitor-analysis. For chart movements within categories, see market-movers.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
2063
最近更新
8月22日