review-harness-spec

Review Harness Spec

Audit a hedera-harness recipe on disk along two axes. Catch mistakes the harness only surfaces after a generator attempt is already burning.

Load the shared vocabulary first: read `../harness-spec-anatomy/SKILL.md` and its GLOSSARY.md.

Targets hedera-harness schemaVersion 3.

Authoring-only skill. Recipes do not list skills.

Step 1: Locate the recipe

The recipe is .harness/spec.yaml under the project root. Read every file it resolves to, remembering that v3 defaults most paths — an absent key is not a missing file:

If the recipe file is missing, stop and ask. If schemaVersion is absent, 1, or 2, stop and recommend rewriting to v3 (contract: → eval:, drop skills:, set schemaVersion: 3) — or regenerate with hedera-harness init. migrate is gone. Review the rewritten recipe, not the stale original.

Step 2: Wiring axis

bash <path-to>/harness-spec-anatomy/scripts/check-spec.sh <project-root>

<project-root> is the directory containing .harness/. The script runs hedera-harness doctor --recipe-only for schema validity, then adds cross-file coherence checks.

Report its findings verbatim under ## Wiring.

If it reports the schema was not validated (harness CLI missing or too old), say so explicitly in the report — the wiring axis is then partial, not passed.

Step 3: Eval axis

Judgment only — what a script cannot see. Work through references/review-checklist.md. Cover at least:

• Every PRD journey maps to ≥ 1 assertion in the matching evaluate checklist
• Every assertion traces back to a PRD journey (no orphans / scope creep)
• Severity budget sane (prefer ≤ 2 critical)
• Needles pin real scripts, not brittle implementation strings
• Playwright stage stays thin; deep UX lives in the checklist
• No skills: key (product plugins are discovered; the generator picks)
• The recipe is not padded with values that merely restate a default
• For increments: each one leaves the app green, they are ordered by

dependency, and eval: is 1:1 with prd:

Report under ## Eval. Do not merge or rerank with Wiring — a recipe can be perfectly wired and still grade the wrong thing.

Step 4: Emit the report

# Harness Recipe Review — <slug>

## Summary
- **Schema**: v3 | stale (rewrite first)
- **Stage ambition**: ASSERT | +SMOKE | +EVALUATE | +CHAIN
- **Increments**: single PRD | N ordered (eval paired: yes / no / scalar)
- **Ready to run ASSERT?**: yes / no
- **Wiring findings**: N  (schema validated: yes / no)
- **Eval findings**: N

## Wiring
- [script output or hand-checked findings]

## Eval
### Blocker
- [id] <what> — <where> — <fix>
### Warning
- [id] <what> — <where> — <fix>
### OK
- [id] <what>

Step 5: Handoff

If ready for ASSERT:

hedera-harness run .harness/spec.yaml --max-attempts 3
# or: yarn harness:run

Additional resources

• references/review-checklist.md
• Companion: /create-harness-spec
• Vocabulary: /harness-spec-anatomy