mvanhorn/cli-printing-press

printing-press-import

Bring a published CLI from the public library into the internal library so it's identical to a freshly-generated copy — module path reverted, manuscripts placed alongside, ready for /printing-press-polish or /printing-press-emboss.

查看源码
仓库原始内容

按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。

/printing-press-import

Bring a published CLI from the public library (`mvanhorn/printing-press-library`) into the internal library at $PRESS_LIBRARY/ so it matches the form the generator would produce. Manuscripts ride along.

bash
/printing-press-import notion
/printing-press-import cal.com
/printing-press-import allrecipes --from-clone ~/Code/printing-press-library

The internal library is the working copy; the public library is the durable artifact. After import, the CLI is ready for polish, emboss, or re-publish — the publish step will re-apply the module path rewrites.

When to run

  • The public library has a CLI you don't have locally
  • The internal copy is broken, lost, or out of sync
  • You want a clean baseline before running polish on a published CLI

If the user is asking to polish a CLI and mentions "in/from the public library" or "from the repo", suggest running this skill first.

Setup

bash
PRESS_HOME="${PRINTING_PRESS_HOME:-$HOME/printing-press}"
PRESS_LIBRARY="$PRESS_HOME/library"
PRESS_MANUSCRIPTS="$PRESS_HOME/manuscripts"
SCRIPTS_DIR="$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]:-.}")/references"

if ! command -v go >/dev/null 2>&1; then
  echo ""
  echo "[setup-error] Go toolchain not found."
  echo ""
  echo "This Printing Press flow runs Go-based build or validation commands."
  echo "Install Go 1.26.6 or newer from https://go.dev/dl/, then verify with:"
  echo "  go version"
  echo "Then re-run this skill."
  echo ""
  return 1 2>/dev/null || exit 1
fi

_pp_check_disk_space() {
  _pp_disk_warn_kb="${PRINTING_PRESS_DISK_WARN_KB:-3145728}"
  _pp_disk_fail_kb="${PRINTING_PRESS_DISK_FAIL_KB:-524288}"
  case "$_pp_disk_warn_kb$_pp_disk_fail_kb" in
    ""|*[!0-9]*) return 0 ;;
  esac

  _pp_disk_path="$PRESS_HOME"
  while [ ! -e "$_pp_disk_path" ] && [ "$_pp_disk_path" != "/" ]; do
    _pp_disk_path="$(dirname "$_pp_disk_path")"
  done

  _pp_disk_avail_kb="$(df -Pk "$_pp_disk_path" 2>/dev/null | awk 'BEGIN {
    if ((getline header) <= 0 || (getline record) <= 0) exit
    field_count = split(record, fields)
    if (field_count >= 4) print fields[4]
  }')"
  case "$_pp_disk_avail_kb" in
    ""|*[!0-9]*) return 0 ;;
  esac

  if [ "$_pp_disk_avail_kb" -lt "$_pp_disk_fail_kb" ]; then
    echo ""
    echo "[setup-error] Critically low disk space on the Printing Press workspace volume."
    echo "PRESS_DISK_PATH=$_pp_disk_path"
    echo "PRESS_DISK_AVAIL_KB=$_pp_disk_avail_kb"
    echo "PRESS_DISK_FAIL_KB=$_pp_disk_fail_kb"
    echo "Free disk space or set PRINTING_PRESS_HOME to a volume with more room, then re-run this skill."
    echo ""
    return 1
  fi

  if [ "$_pp_disk_avail_kb" -lt "$_pp_disk_warn_kb" ]; then
    echo ""
    echo "[low-disk] Printing Press workspace volume is low on free space."
    echo "PRESS_DISK_PATH=$_pp_disk_path"
    echo "PRESS_DISK_AVAIL_KB=$_pp_disk_avail_kb"
    echo "PRESS_DISK_WARN_KB=$_pp_disk_warn_kb"
    echo "This flow may need several GiB for generated files, Go build cache, module downloads, or repository clones."
    echo ""
  fi
}
_pp_check_disk_space || { return 1 2>/dev/null || exit 1; }

The four reference scripts live alongside this SKILL.md under references/:

  • import-fetch.sh <library-path> <staging> [--clone <path>]
  • import-backup.sh <api-slug> (prints zip path on stdout)
  • import-rewrite.sh <staging> <api-slug>
  • import-place.sh <staging> <api-slug>

If setup emitted [low-disk], surface the advisory to the user and continue unless setup also emitted [setup-error]. [low-disk] means this run may need several GiB for repository clones, staged files, backups, Go build cache, or module downloads.

Phase 1 — Resolve the CLI

The argument can be anything natural: an API slug (notion), a brand name (cal.com), an old CLI name (notion-pp-cli), or close enough (Allrecipes). Resolve via the public library's registry.json — which carries name, category, api, description, and path for every entry, in one fetch.

bash
REGISTRY=$(mktemp)
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3.raw" \
  repos/mvanhorn/printing-press-library/contents/registry.json \
  > "$REGISTRY"

Match in this order:

  1. Exact `name` matchjq --arg q "$ARG" '.entries[] | select(.name == $q)' "$REGISTRY"
  2. Normalized exact — strip -pp-cli suffix, lowercase, dot→hyphen, then exact match
  3. Substring on `name` or `description` — case-insensitive contains
bash
# Exact:
jq --arg q "$ARG" '.entries[] | select(.name == $q)' "$REGISTRY"

# Normalized exact (after $ARG2 = lowercase, dot→hyphen, suffix-stripped):
jq --arg q "$ARG2" '.entries[] | select(.name == $q)' "$REGISTRY"

# Fuzzy (substring on name or description):
jq --arg q "$ARG2" '.entries[]
  | select((.name | ascii_downcase | contains($q | ascii_downcase))
        or (.description | ascii_downcase | contains($q | ascii_downcase)))
' "$REGISTRY"

If you get one match: use it. If multiple: present at most 4 to the user via AskUserQuestion showing name + description per candidate. If zero: tell the user the public library doesn't have that CLI.

The matched entry gives you everything you need:

  • LIB_PATH from .path (e.g., library/productivity/cal-com)
  • API_SLUG from .name
  • CATEGORY from .category

Don't slurp whole files when reasoning over candidates. The fields above are enough; if you genuinely need more, the per-CLI manifest is just <LIB_PATH>/manifest.json and the description there can be pulled the same way (gh api -H "Accept: ... raw" .../manifest.json | jq -r '.description').

Phase 2 — Decide on overwrite

Check whether the internal library already has this CLI:

bash
LIB_TARGET="$PRESS_LIBRARY/$API_SLUG"
MAN_TARGET="$PRESS_MANUSCRIPTS/$API_SLUG"

If neither exists: straightforward import — proceed to Phase 3.

If either exists: read provenance from both sides to decide whether to overwrite. Don't read whole .printing-press.json files — pull just the fields that matter:

bash
# Internal provenance (if present):
jq '{run_id, generated_at, printing_press_version, spec_checksum}' \
  "$LIB_TARGET/.printing-press.json" 2>/dev/null

# Public provenance (one-shot via raw):
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3.raw" \
  repos/mvanhorn/printing-press-library/contents/$LIB_PATH/.printing-press.json \
  | jq '{run_id, generated_at, printing_press_version, spec_checksum}'

Reason over the diff:

  • Same `run_id` — public is the same generation as internal. Likely

no-op; ask before clobbering. If the user wants to import anyway (e.g., to recover from a broken internal copy), proceed.

  • Public newer `generated_at` — public has changes the internal

doesn't. Importing is the safe move; ask the user to confirm.

  • Internal newer `generated_at` — internal has work the public

doesn't (in-progress polish, manual fixes). Importing would clobber that. Stop and surface this to the user — they likely want to publish the internal changes first.

  • Either side missing `.printing-press.json` — older or hand-imported.

Ask the user.

When the user confirms overwrite, the backup step in Phase 3 captures the current internal state.

Phase 3 — Import

bash
STAGING=$(mktemp -d)

# Fetch (remote unless --from-clone was passed)
if [[ -n "${CLONE_PATH:-}" ]]; then
  bash "$SCRIPTS_DIR/import-fetch.sh" "$LIB_PATH" "$STAGING" --clone "$CLONE_PATH"
else
  bash "$SCRIPTS_DIR/import-fetch.sh" "$LIB_PATH" "$STAGING"
fi

# Backup if anything is being clobbered. Prints zip path on stdout.
if [[ -d "$LIB_TARGET" || -d "$MAN_TARGET" ]]; then
  BACKUP_ZIP=$(bash "$SCRIPTS_DIR/import-backup.sh" "$API_SLUG")
  echo "Backed up to: $BACKUP_ZIP"
fi

# Reverse the publish-step module path rewrites.
bash "$SCRIPTS_DIR/import-rewrite.sh" "$STAGING" "$API_SLUG"

# Atomically move staging into place.
bash "$SCRIPTS_DIR/import-place.sh" "$STAGING" "$API_SLUG"

Phase 4 — Verify internal consistency

After the move, confirm the imported CLI builds and is structurally intact. Treat any failure as a real problem — don't paper over it.

bash
cd "$LIB_TARGET"

# Module path is local form
grep -q "^module ${API_SLUG}-pp-cli\$" go.mod \
  || { echo "FAIL: go.mod still on public module path"; exit 1; }

# No public module path leaked into source
if grep -rq "github.com/mvanhorn/printing-press-library/library" \
   --include='*.go' --include='*.yaml' --include='*.yml' .; then
  echo "FAIL: source still references public module path"
  exit 1
fi

# Build
go build ./... \
  || { echo "FAIL: go build"; exit 1; }

# Doctor (self-check)
make doctor 2>/dev/null \
  || ./bin/${API_SLUG}-pp-cli doctor 2>/dev/null \
  || true   # best-effort; not all CLIs have doctor wired the same way

Report the import outcome:

  • Source path (from registry: <category>/<api-slug>)
  • Run ID (from .printing-press.json)
  • Manuscripts run-ids placed (count + names)
  • Backup zip path (if any)
  • Build status

Polish-side hint

If the user's request to import was triggered by a polish ask (e.g., they said "polish notion in the public library"), suggest:

Imported $API_SLUG. To polish: /printing-press-polish $API_SLUG

The polish skill operates on the internal library, so import-then-polish is the right flow when starting from a published CLI.

来自同一仓库

更多 Skills

全部 Skills
mvanhorn
社区

printing-press-amend

Amend a published CLI from one of two input sources: (1) dogfood mode mines the active Claude Code session transcript for friction (missing flags, hand- rolled API payloads, silent-null returns); (2) direct-input mode accepts user-supplied asks (rename a command, add commands or feeds, fix a named bug, optionally sniff the source site for new endpoints). Confirms scope with the user, plans + executes the fix autonomously, scrubs PII, and opens a PR against mvanhorn/printing-press-library. Two user-in-loop checkpoints: scope after capture, PR draft before open. Trigger phrases: "amend the CLI", "submit a patch", "fix what I just dogfooded", "open a PR for this CLI", "patch this CLI", "add features to my CLI", "rename this command", "add these feeds to ", "sniff for new APIs in ", "amend with these ideas", "use printing-press-amend", "run printing-press-amend".

安装量
1
GitHub Stars
4644
最近更新
9月7日
mvanhorn
社区

printing-press-score

Score a generated CLI against the Steinberger bar, compare two CLIs side-by-side

安装量
1
GitHub Stars
4644
最近更新
9月7日
mvanhorn
社区

printing-press

Set up a new integration, connector, or CLI binding for any API. Wrap or generate a ship-ready Go CLI from an OpenAPI, HAR, or Postman spec via the lean research - generate - build - shipcheck loop. Use when the user says build a CLI, wrap this API, set up a new integration, add a connector, integrate with a service, or names an API by domain.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
4644
最近更新
9月7日
mvanhorn
社区

printing-press-output-review

Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish SKILL.md during the diagnostic loop. Not for direct user invocation — its actionable wrappers are /printing-press and /printing-press-polish.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
4644
最近更新
9月7日