reticlehq/reticle

debug-broken-ui

Find out why something in a running web app does not work, when the console is empty and the code looks correct.

查看源码
仓库原始内容

按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。

The app is broken and the code looks fine

Reading the source again will not tell you why. The evidence is in the running app, and most of it never reaches the screen: the request that failed, the store that never moved, the handler that was never bound, the element covered by something invisible.

Reticle reads all of it from inside the page. Not installed? RETICLE_INSTALL_SOURCE=npx_skill npx @reticlehq/server@latest init, then the `install-and-verify` skill.

Do not start by guessing. Start by reproducing.

reticle_look({ action: "page", sessionId, mode: "interactive" })   // controls only, with refs
reticle_act_and_wait({ sessionId, ref, action: "click", until: { kind: "element", query: { testid: "..." } } })

The verdict already narrows it: no / contradicted means a channel saw something incompatible with the UI: you have the bug. unknown means Reticle drove it and could not tell, which is a different investigation from "it failed".

Read the act result before you call anything else. Its summary block already carries the whole causal window of that one click: net {total, errors, headline}, consoleErrors, stateDiffs [{path, from, to}], storageDiffs [{key, from, to}], route, signals, layoutShift, longTasks: real before→after diffs, not counts. The console, network, storage and state calls below are for going DEEPER into something the summary already pointed at. Calling all three straight after an act pays three model round trips (and, in an approval-gated client, three human clicks) for evidence you were already holding.

summary.stateUnwatched: true means the state channel is dark: no subscribable store is registered, so an empty stateDiffs means unwatched, not unchanged, and no state-based conclusion is available until someone registers the store. It is the one field here that is about your instrumentation rather than about the app.

When the summary does point somewhere, read that channel scoped to what you just did: pass since from the act result, or you are reading a buffer that predates the click:

reticle_observe({ action: "console", sessionId, since })
reticle_observe({ action: "network", sessionId, since })
reticle_look({ action: "state", sessionId, store })

The diagnosis table

What you seeWhat it isNext
No request fired at allthe handler is not bound, or a client cache served a stale valuereticle_look { action: "element" } the element for its file:line; check the cache if it is TanStack Query
Request fired, 4xx/5xxa real backend failure the UI swallowedthe response body is in the network entry
2xx but nothing changedthe app never read the response: verdict says outcome_unreadusually a real bug in the success path
Request fine, DOM fine, store staleUI-vs-state desync, invisible to any screenshotreticle_look { action: "state" } is the only witness; this is the highest-value read here
Click did nothing, no errorthe control is dead, occluded, or disabledreticle_look { action: "element" } returns occluded, box (0×0), styles.cursor, opacity
Element "not found" that you can seevirtualised list has not mounted itreticle_scroll_to. A query that misses is not evidence of absence
Looks logged in, behaves logged outthe token never persistedreticle_storage
Console error that predates your clicka pre-existing fault, not your bugcall it out before continuing

Get the file, not a theory

reticle_look({ action: "element", sessionId, ref })

Returns the component and source: { file, line } for the element you are looking at, plus whether it is occluded, sized, disabled or off-theme. That is the pointer to open. End the investigation with a location, not a hypothesis.

When the flow is long

Do not ping-pong act → snapshot → act → snapshot to find the failing step. Drive the journey with reticle_act { steps: [...] } and assert once; the first step whose consequence fails is the one to look at, and you paid a fraction of the calls to find it.

Before you say it is fixed

Re-run the reproduction as a verdict (reticle_act_and_wait with the consequence named up front) rather than eyeballing the page. A fix confirmed by looking at it is the failure mode that created this ticket.

And never weaken the check to make it pass.


Troubleshooting Reticle itself (as opposed to the app): curl https://docs.reticle.sh/troubleshooting.md. Everything else: curl https://docs.reticle.sh/llms.txt. If Reticle could not see something you needed, reticle_session { action: "feedback" } with kind: "gap".

来自同一仓库

更多 Skills

全部 Skills
reticlehq
社区

agentic-tdd

Test-driven development for behaviour a unit test cannot reach, by writing the expectation against the running app before writing the code. Declare the consequence first, watch it fail, implement, watch it pass. Use when building a user-facing feature, when the user asks for TDD on UI or full-stack work, when a unit test cannot express the outcome that matters, or when you want a red-green loop that runs against the real app instead of mocks.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
732
最近更新
9月19日
reticlehq
社区

audit-my-app

Sweep a whole running web app for what is broken, without writing a script or knowing the codebase. Clicks every reachable control and reports dead buttons, console errors, failed requests, and places where the API and the screen disagree. Use on an unfamiliar codebase, before a release, after a big merge or dependency bump, when the user asks for a smoke test or a health check, or when someone says "just check everything still works".

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
732
最近更新
9月19日
reticlehq
社区

design-system-compliance

Check that the UI you actually rendered uses the design system, by reading computed styles in the running app against the project's design tokens. Catches hardcoded hex colors, off-palette backgrounds, invisible or unusable controls, and animations that never ran. Use after building or restyling a component, when a design review is wanted, when a UI looks slightly off but nobody can say why, or when a design system exists and nothing checks whether the code follows it.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
732
最近更新
9月19日
reticlehq
社区

drive-desktop-app

Drive and verify an Electron or Tauri desktop app from the inside, including the main-process and Rust IPC calls a browser tool cannot see. Use when a desktop app needs testing, when a feature works in the browser but not in the packaged app, when an IPC or invoke call needs proving, when a desktop screenshot or visual diff is wanted, or when you need a headless run of a desktop UI in CI.

安装量
2
GitHub Stars
732
最近更新
9月19日