按源仓库内容呈现,保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。
Trading Skills Navigator
The interactive on-ramp for this repository. It turns a user's goal into a concrete recommendation: which workflow to run, which skillset (skills-index category) it belongs to, the API requirement, and the setup path for Claude Web App or Claude Code.
A new user faces 74 skills + 11 workflows with no router. This skill is that router. It is deterministic — a Python recommender (scripts/recommend.py) consumes the repo metadata; this SKILL.md narrates the result conversationally.
When to Use
- The user expresses a trading/investing goal and asks where to start or which
skill/workflow to use ("どれを使えばいい", "where do I start").
- The user asks what works without paid API keys.
- The user wants the no-API vs API path separated, or a beginner path.
- The user describes a persona ("part-time swing trader", "dividend investor",
"I want to short", "I want to backtest ideas") and needs routing.
Do not use this skill to execute trades, place orders, or auto-run other skills. It recommends and explains only.
Workflow
Step 1 — Capture the goal and constraints
From the user's message, extract:
- The natural-language goal (verbatim is fine).
- Optional constraints: no-API only? a daily time budget
(15m/30m/60m/90m)? experience level (beginner/intermediate/advanced)?
Ask at most one brief clarifying question only if the goal is empty or has no discernible intent. Otherwise proceed — the recommender degrades gracefully.
Step 2 — Run the recommender
python3 skills/trading-skills-navigator/scripts/recommend.py \
--query "<the user's goal, verbatim>" \
--format json
# optional: --no-api --time-budget 15m|30m|60m|90m|any
# --experience beginner|intermediate|advanced- In Claude Code the script reads the repo-root SSoT
(skills-index.yaml + workflows/*.yaml) automatically.
- In the Claude Web App there is no repo root; the script transparently
falls back to the bundled assets/metadata_snapshot.json. The recommendation is byte-identical in both environments — no behavior change for the user.
Step 3 — Narrate the result conversationally
Parse the JSON and explain, in the user's language:
- Primary workflow —
display_name,cadence,~estimated_minutes,
api_profile. State plainly what it does and when to run it.
- Routing diagnostics — read
routing_diagnostics.status. For
ambiguous, name every candidate_personas entry and explain that the ordered first match was selected. For fallback, state that no persona matched and ask the user to rephrase; never present the beginner fallback as an exact intent match.
- Secondary workflows — if any, how they relate (e.g. "run the regime
check first, then this when it allows risk").
- Skillset — the
skillset.id(skills-index category).
manifest_status: active means a curated skillsets/<id>.yaml bundle ships for this category (market-regime, core-portfolio, swing-opportunity, trade-memory) — mention it as the install bundle for the recommended workflow. manifest_status: deferred means no manifest yet (e.g. honest-gap categories); the recommendation is workflow-based only.
- No-API vs API — read
no_api_path:true→ the entire recommended path
works without paid API keys (state this plainly); false → tell the user which paid key(s) the path needs; null → honest gap, no path. (no_api is the request flag — whether no-API mode was active — not whether the path is free; always narrate no_api_path.) If a workflow was excluded under --no-api, surface the rationale entry naming the paid integration (e.g. "swing-opportunity-daily needs FMP").
- Honest gap — if
honest_gapis true there is no shipped workflow for
this intent. Say so directly, then present suggested_skills from the relevant category and relay the note. Never invent a workflow.
- Operational roles — narrate the
operational_rolesentry for every
skill in the setup bundle or honest-gap suggestion. Explain standalone rationale when present; keep enum values unchanged.
- Always read the
rationalearray and explain why this was recommended.
Step 4 — Explain the setup path
Read references/setup_paths.md and walk the user through installing `setup_bundle` — the recommender's deterministic install union over the primary skillset and every secondary workflow (so nothing is dropped for a multi-workflow recommendation). Enumerate setup_bundle.required → recommended → optional, cite setup_bundle.sources to explain why each skill is needed, and name skillset.manifest.related_workflows for how the bundle is run. Narrate skillset.manifest (when present) as "what the recommended skillset is". On an honest gap install suggested_skills. Do this for whichever environment the user is in (Claude Web App .skill upload, or Claude Code folder copy); call out any paid API keys those skills need.
Step 5 — Point to the learning loop
Close by pointing the user at trader-memory-core and the trade-memory-loop / monthly-performance-review workflows so every recommended path feeds the Plan → Trade → Record → Review → Improve loop.
Output Format
The JSON the recommender emits (stable, idempotent, sort_keys):
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
primary_workflow | Recommended workflow object, or null on an honest gap |
secondary_workflows | Supporting workflows (ordered, time-budget filtered) |
skillset | {id, source: skills-index.category, manifest_status, manifest}. manifest_status is active when skillsets/<id>.yaml ships, else deferred. manifest is the 5-key view {display_name, required_skills, recommended_skills, optional_skills, related_workflows} when active, else null. Describes the primary skillset only — not the install list |
setup_bundle | {required, recommended, optional, sources} — the actionable install union over the primary skillset and every secondary workflow (deterministic, tier-deduped). This is what to install. All-empty on an honest gap (use suggested_skills) |
suggested_skills | Skills to use when no workflow shipped (honest gap); else [] |
operational_roles | Skill id → {type, rationale?} for every setup-bundle skill, or every suggested_skills item on an honest gap |
no_api | Request-side: was no-API constraint mode active (flag or persona) |
no_api_path | Path-side: does the whole recommendation (primary + every secondary) work without paid API keys? true/false; null on an honest gap. This is the DoD's API-vs-no-API separation — narrate it explicitly |
honest_gap | true when no workflow exists for the intent |
note | Plain-language explanation for gaps / unmapped input |
rationale | Ordered list of why-this-was-recommended strings |
routing_diagnostics | {status, selected_persona, candidate_personas, explanation}. status is exact, ambiguous, or fallback; candidates are all pre-constraint persona matches in deterministic order |
setup_path_ref | Pointer to the setup-path reference |
Resources
scripts/recommend.py— the deterministic recommender (single source of
truth for routing).
scripts/build_snapshot.py— regeneratesassets/metadata_snapshot.json
from the SSoT; --check guards drift (pre-commit + CI).
scripts/intent_benchmark.py— validates the fail-closed bilingual routing
corpus, persona shadowing contracts, and metamorphic invariants.
references/intent_routing.md— the persona table, the 10-question contract,
the --no-api credential rule, and scoring tie-breaks.
references/setup_paths.md— Claude Web App vs Claude Code setup steps.assets/metadata_snapshot.json— generated SSoT digest for the Web App
fallback. Never edit by hand; run build_snapshot.py.
assets/intent_benchmark_v1.json— 211 explicitly labeled EN/JA routing
cases with 1.0 precision/recall and per-persona/workflow coverage gates.

