使用方法
- 复制安装命令，在自己的智能体环境安装前先检查源码包。
- 从原始文档核对所需工具、凭据和支持的宿主。
- 说明输入材料与期望交付物，并对照来源检查输出。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill aggregate-ranking开始前需了解
- 安装不包含模型订阅、API 额度或访问文件的权限。
- 仓库星数和安装量反映活跃情况，不等于独立质量或安全测试。
仓库原始内容
按源仓库内容呈现，保留标题、案例、代码、表格、链接以及原文引用的演示图片。
aggregate-ranking
Purpose
Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.
Input contract
yaml
required: [candidate_set, criterion_results, aggregation_rule]
optional: [tie_break_rule, missing_value_policy, uncertainty_annotations]
constraints: [criterion directions and scales must be declared; no silent imputation]Procedure
- Align candidate identifiers, criterion directions, units, and validity flags.
- Apply the supplied aggregation rule without changing weights or directions.
- Propagate missingness and uncertainty; apply the declared tie-break only after aggregation.
- Return ordered candidates with component contributions and recommendation status.
Output contract
yaml
produces: [ordered_recommendation, aggregate_scores, contribution_table, unresolved_comparisons]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, decisions, uncertainties]Quality gates
- Every ranked candidate has a traceable value for each required criterion or an explicit unresolved marker.
- Aggregation reproduces the supplied rule and preserves criterion direction.
- Ties and sensitivity to tie-breaks are reported.
Parameterization
Caller supplies candidate schema, criterion scales/directions, weights or aggregation formula, tie-break rule, and missing/uncertainty policy.
Failure and counterexamples
Reject mixed units without normalization; reject a recommendation when a hard criterion is unresolved.
Provenance map
- resolved: priority-synthesis
- resolved: scoring-synthesis
Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | criterion |
|---|---|
| priority-synthesis | All scoring dimensions are present for every gap. |
| priority-synthesis | Weight vector sums to 1.0 within +/-0.001. |
| priority-synthesis | Priority list is sorted descending; ties use feasibility sub-score. |
| priority-synthesis | Top N is N=min(3,total gaps) and includes attack-path suggestions. |
| scoring-synthesis | Final recommendation includes recommended alternative, confidence, key assumptions, and risk warnings. |
