affaan-m/ecc

token-budget-advisor

Offer a choice of response depth (25%/50%/75%/100%) with token estimates before answering, then answer at that level.

Quelltext ansehen

Verwendung

  1. Installationsbefehl kopieren und das Quellpaket vor der Installation in der eigenen Agentenumgebung prüfen.
  2. Benötigte Werkzeuge, Zugangsdaten und Hosts im Original prüfen.
  3. Eingabe und gewünschtes Ergebnis beschreiben und die Ausgabe mit den Quellen abgleichen.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill token-budget-advisor

Vor dem Start

  • Die Installation umfasst weder Modellabo noch API-Kontingent oder Dateizugriffsrechte.
  • Sterne und Installationen zeigen Aktivität, keine unabhängige Qualitäts- oder Sicherheitsprüfung.
Originales Skill-Dokument

Aus dem Quell-Repository gerendert; Überschriften, Beispiele, Code, Tabellen, Links und Bilder bleiben erhalten.

Token Budget Advisor (TBA)

Intercept the response flow to offer the user a choice about response depth before Claude answers.

When to Use

  • User wants to control how long or detailed a response is
  • User mentions tokens, budget, depth, or response length
  • User says "short version", "tldr", "brief", "al 25%", "exhaustive", etc.
  • Any time the user wants to choose depth/detail level upfront

Do not trigger when: user already set a level this session (maintain it silently), or the answer is trivially one line.

How It Works

Step 1 — Estimate input tokens

Use the repository's canonical context-budget heuristics to estimate the prompt's token count mentally.

Use the same calibration guidance as context-budget:

  • prose: words × 1.3
  • code-heavy or mixed/code blocks: chars / 4

For mixed content, use the dominant content type and keep the estimate heuristic.

Step 2 — Estimate response size by complexity

Classify the prompt, then apply the multiplier range to get the full response window:

ComplexityMultiplier rangeExample prompts
Simple3× – 8×"What is X?", yes/no, single fact
Medium8× – 20×"How does X work?"
Medium-High10× – 25×Code request with context
Complex15× – 40×Multi-part analysis, comparisons, architecture
Creative10× – 30×Stories, essays, narrative writing

Response window = input_tokens × mult_min to input_tokens × mult_max (but don’t exceed your model’s configured output-token limit).

Step 3 — Present depth options

Present this block before answering, using the actual estimated numbers:

Analyzing your prompt...

Input: ~[N] tokens  |  Type: [type]  |  Complexity: [level]  |  Language: [lang]

Choose your depth level:

[1] Essential   (25%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Direct answer only, no preamble
[2] Moderate    (50%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Answer + context + 1 example
[3] Detailed    (75%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Full answer with alternatives
[4] Exhaustive (100%)  ->  ~[tokens]   Everything, no limits

Which level? (1-4 or say "25% depth", "50% depth", "75% depth", "100% depth")

Precision: heuristic estimate ~85-90% accuracy (±15%).

Level token estimates (within the response window):

  • 25% → min + (max - min) × 0.25
  • 50% → min + (max - min) × 0.50
  • 75% → min + (max - min) × 0.75
  • 100% → max

Step 4 — Respond at the chosen level

LevelTarget lengthIncludeOmit
25% Essential2-4 sentences maxDirect answer, key conclusionContext, examples, nuance, alternatives
50% Moderate1-3 paragraphsAnswer + necessary context + 1 exampleDeep analysis, edge cases, references
75% DetailedStructured responseMultiple examples, pros/cons, alternativesExtreme edge cases, exhaustive references
100% ExhaustiveNo restrictionEverything — full analysis, all code, all perspectivesNothing

Shortcuts — skip the question

If the user already signals a level, respond at that level immediately without asking:

What they sayLevel
"1" / "25% depth" / "short version" / "brief answer" / "tldr"25%
"2" / "50% depth" / "moderate depth" / "balanced answer"50%
"3" / "75% depth" / "detailed answer" / "thorough answer"75%
"4" / "100% depth" / "exhaustive answer" / "full deep dive"100%

If the user set a level earlier in the session, maintain it silently for subsequent responses unless they change it.

Precision note

This skill uses heuristic estimation — no real tokenizer. Accuracy ~85-90%, variance ±15%. Always show the disclaimer.

Examples

Triggers

  • "Give me the short version first."
  • "How many tokens will your answer use?"
  • "Respond at 50% depth."
  • "I want the exhaustive answer, not the summary."
  • "Dame la version corta y luego la detallada."

Does Not Trigger

  • "What is a JWT token?"
  • "The checkout flow uses a payment token."
  • "Is this normal?"
  • "Complete the refactor."
  • Follow-up questions after the user already chose a depth for the session

Source

Standalone skill from TBA — Token Budget Advisor for Claude Code. Original project also ships a Python estimator script, but this repository keeps the skill self-contained and heuristic-only.

Verwandte Aufgaben

aus demselben Repository

Weitere Skills

Alle Skills
affaan-m
Community

agent-self-evaluation

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

Installationen
3
GitHub Stars
287.340
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
affaan-m
Community

configure-ecc

Run the conversational ECC setup wizard inside the current harness: inventory the install, collect scope (user/project/local) and hook mode (off/minimal/standard/strict) in Claude Code, use Codex's native plugin lifecycle, or install the project surface under ./.kimi-code, then preview, apply, and verify. Use when installing, updating, reconfiguring, or repairing an ECC installation, changing hook profiles, or moving ECC between install scopes.

Installationen
3
GitHub Stars
287.340
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
affaan-m
Community

contract-first

Coordinate frontend/backend or service-to-service work through one authoritative machine-checkable contract (OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, Protocol Buffers, or JSON Schema), with generated consumer types and contract-verified integration. Use when parallel consumer and provider work must evolve an API or event schema without field drift, mock/production shape mismatch, or one side silently redefining the interface.

Installationen
3
GitHub Stars
287.340
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.
affaan-m
Community

django-patterns

Django architecture patterns, REST API design with DRF, ORM best practices, caching, signals, middleware, and production-grade Django apps. Use when building or reviewing Django apps, DRF APIs, ORM queries, or caching.

Installationen
3
GitHub Stars
287.340
Aktualisiert
20. Okt.